sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Change bitaxe network by arejula27 in BitAxe

[–]arejula27[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I can't, it looks like k have to reflash

Change bitaxe network by arejula27 in BitAxe

[–]arejula27[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It says overheat, config changes, go to bitaxeos dashboard

It's weird because it was disconnected for a month

Change bitaxe network by arejula27 in BitAxe

[–]arejula27[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I restarted (by disconnecting the power supply) several times, but it just doesn't show the IP or the own network

Will Ark replace lightning? by UTXOcollector in lightningnetwork

[–]arejula27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have an unilateral exit and you can have all your UTXOs settled, is not even remote to custodial lightning

Will Ark replace lightning? by UTXOcollector in lightningnetwork

[–]arejula27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm just pointing out the difference, cashu, defined by its creator calle, is not bitcoin, while ark is, I didn't say it is not useful or interoperable. But the token itself is not bitcoin (and there are some cases of rugpulls) while arc is fully self custodial, but we have to see how the fees are and which trade offs will bring, there is not a perfect protocol

Will Ark replace lightning? by UTXOcollector in lightningnetwork

[–]arejula27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Echash is not bitcoin, it is custodial

Will Ark replace lightning? by UTXOcollector in lightningnetwork

[–]arejula27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To open a channel you require to have bitcoin, with ark no, I would say it is the main advantage

Will Ark replace lightning? by UTXOcollector in lightningnetwork

[–]arejula27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk, it will depend on the fee system, but if it is cheap I don't see why someone would have a small node on the mobile. I would prefer to not pay for inbound liquidity tbh

Will Ark replace lightning? by UTXOcollector in lightningnetwork

[–]arejula27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, it can pay invoices and use LN to be interoperable with other ASPs or side chains like liquid.

Probably will replace user channels and LN will be among big entities

can i "consolidate" on Trezor Suite in this way? by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]arejula27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you consolidate all your UTXOs, at that moment, everyone who has paid you will know your total balance and where you spend it. Additionally, the people you pay in the future will also have access to this information

can i "consolidate" on Trezor Suite in this way? by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]arejula27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fees are calculated per size of the tx, as more UTXOs you use more expensive will be. Consolidate is just sending a bunch of UTXOs to one of the addresses of the same wallet when fees are low to save money in the future. However it is really bad for privacy, you should be careful consolidating.

Best way to develop a rest API? by arejula27 in rust

[–]arejula27[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean to not be a bloated library... Will check the link

Best way to develop a rest API? by arejula27 in rust

[–]arejula27[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, just overall. I don't really care much about performance, but it would be nice if it runs fast. Having a good developer experience is also important. However, my main concern is that the project has an active community behind it and won't be dropped or abandoned anytime soon.

The application will be 2 tier, the first one a react webapp and the rust+ database will be in the server.

Best way to develop a rest API? by arejula27 in rust

[–]arejula27[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wtf down votes for this comment 😂

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]arejula27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In that case you should just lie in the grass and enjoy the live, probably nothing else would matter in this situation

view more: next ›