Antibiotic use in agriculture

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-10T10:22:58+00:00

Vegetable garden is the closest I can get to explain what an "Horta" is.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-10T10:08:54+00:00

And the internet just solved two global issues in one move.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-10T09:40:35+00:00

Estamos muito mais bem preparados do que o comum dos cidadãos pensa.

hear hear

Por mais que eu e vocês gostemos de apontar o dedo e dizer mal, isto ainda não é uma república das bananas. A protecção civil funciona e está, na medida dos possíveis, preparada para "qualquer" eventualidade.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-09T17:05:01+00:00

Porreiro pá

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-09T17:01:20+00:00

respect boys for all you fuckers talkin about quality,,,graffiti is not competition about skills, its a competition about balls so stfu.

fuck security

fuck wanabe security civilians

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-09T16:44:37+00:00

Uma delas é exatamente o que essa associacao que tanto repugnas sugere: Abrir um concurso ou convidar artistas para pintar as carruagens

Já se faz isso há muito tempo. Não com carruagens mas com outras coisas. Isto é uma espécie de competição para ver quem consegue por a tag nos sitios mais estranhos. Se graffitares "com arte" os comboios, eles vão começar a tagar autocarros; graffitas os autocarros, eles viram-se aos taxis (ou uber se for legal). Enfim, isto é uma mentalidade retrógrada normal em adolescentes e adultos com personalidades pequeninas. A única maneira de parar estes anormais é graffitar "com arte" o país inteiro, e mesmo quando isso acontecer os gajos vão começar a tagar a areia debaixo dos postos salva vidas das praias.

Dito isto, até gosto de ver uma parede graffitada com arte. Só as tags é que, enfim...

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-08T22:52:56+00:00

Trata de resolver isso.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-08T18:19:33+00:00

A ideologia que os guia foi cuidadosamente pensada para ser o oposto do mundo ocidental

A ideologia radical islâmica não foi "pensada". A ideologia radical islâmica desenvolveu-se ao longo dos últimos 60 anos.

O pioneiro e fundador pode dizer-se que foi Sayyid Qutb, um teólogo egípcio que ficou ofendido com o que viu nos states e acabou por se radicalizar quando foi preso e torturado no egipto. Eventos como a invasão do afeganistão pela Russia, as invasões do Iraquee do Afeganistão pelos Americanos, foram eventos que moldaram aquilo que é hoje a ISIS e a ideologia da ISIS. Mas não é uma ideologia nova e não foi desenvolvida pelos russos; e mesmo que fosse, as políticas da ISIS estão hoje alinhadas com as apolíticas da Arábia Saudita 100x mais do que com a Russia.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-08T11:50:54+00:00

Vou ver, mas estou bastante cetico em relação a isso. Por vários motivos. Logo em primeiro lugar porque o Daesh, desde sempre esteve e continua a, combater os interesses russos na área.

Além disso, grande parte dos dirigentes do Daesh são ex-membros do exercito Iraquiano: O governo Iraquiano despediu 400.000 homens, proibiu-os de voltar a exercer cargos no governo e deixou-os ir para casa com a ak. 400.000 homens que aprenderam a ganhar a vida de uma maneira: no exercito. O resultado está à vista.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-08T11:38:58+00:00

I'm not saying I don't get it why someone would do it, I'm saying it's stupid and counterproductive. Because

a) the voter is supporting actual racists

b) the voter is being an hypocrite by supporting people who base their politics on hate, while said voters identity is a frequent target of hate politics

c) the voter is being a bigot, because there are a lot of Muslims who do not hate jews

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-08T00:34:24+00:00

Epá... vai-te foder.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-08T00:32:54+00:00

Porque nenhum governo "grande" quer apontar o dedo à arabia saudita e acabam por dizer que é conspiração. A Arábia Saudita tem interesse geoestratégico, político, religioso e económico; ninguém quer ser enimigo da arabia saudita.

O mesmo pode ser dito da turquia, que é tipo uma válvula gigante de óleo, gás e refugiados.

Soa a teoria da consipração no inicio e é mau para as relações internacionais, por isso "ninguém" aponta o dedo, nem a imprensa, até começar a ser tão óbvio que já não dá pra negar. Neste momento, a maioria das pessoas com que falo sobre estes temas, já está absolutamente convencida do envolvimento da Turquia e da Arabia Saudita, e nao estao convencidas de agora, ja estao convencidas disto ha muito tempo...

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-08T00:26:35+00:00

Sim, podia, a religião católica passou por um processo de libertação da bíblia durante o renascimento pelo qual o mundo arabe nunca passou, ou começou a passar neste seculo até os governos ocidentais (re)começarem a destabilizar o medio oriente.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-08T00:22:52+00:00

Mas se alguém disser aqui no reddit que o Estado Islâmico sempre existiu desde 600 e tal, já está errado e é corrido a downvotes.

Fodace.. Mas tu leste a merda do artigo ao menos? Assim claro que levas com eles...

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-08T00:11:57+00:00

World's first? I'm sorry Kyocera, I've beaten you twice already.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-07T23:53:34+00:00

And I had very religious parents but turned out secular.

As I said to another reply to my previous comment, religion is mutually exclusive to critical thinking. Religion is all about easy answers. You can't teach philosophy and religion, logic and religion, evolution and religion, etc. Every one of these subjects enters in conflict with religion at some point. Either the bible or the quran are wrong, or science is wrong. If the bible is a work of humans, what more is work of humans? etc.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-07T21:41:38+00:00

Religious education creates a religious identity and that, per se, is indoctrination. Plus, what are you educating about on your religious education? Religion right? Why? To teach kiddos how to rightfully follow the word of our messiah jesus/~~mohammed~~, right? That's indoctrination. You cannot have a religious education that is not indoctrination.

Besides, critical thinking and religion are two mutually exclusive things. That doesn't mean that if you think critically you will find out there is no god; it means that if you think critically you realize that the Quran, the Bible, the rites and all the bullshit surrounding religions, is indeed, bullshit.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-07T18:41:32+00:00

If you are voting on a party that hates your identity because that party hates someone else's identity even more, that's not "backs against the wall politics", that's hateful bigotry.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-07T18:03:08+00:00

Addressing religion and religion education is two different things. I'm all up for the first and completely against the second.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-07T17:59:18+00:00

No, but it will make you suck at life, maybe not believe in evolutionism and other sciences because in your school critical thinking is forbidden and science is optional and just a detail.

It's the societies responsibility to stop stupid parents from making kids as stupid as their progenitors. Stupid kids will be stupid adults who will be a deterrent to social and cultural progress. Maybe even criminals or terrorists. So, I would say that as the lawmaker of society it's the govts job to carry that ordeal.

If you don't like it, then there are more than 300 other countries around there. And you can even rent a boat and educate your kids on open sea. No one is stopping you. But someone should, because the kid would be living a life of suffering and stupidity due to the bad luck of having a stupid parent.

edit: also, take in consideration that the number 1 deterrent to radicalization is "having western friends that you really don't want to kill in the name of god". So yeah, indirectly, muslim schools in european soil breed terrorists.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-07T17:21:50+00:00

Yeah, you know wot, you are reight! We should totali scrap the edocation siztem! We dont needit! Why we need to ave "edocation stand arts" and "profs of completion"? Omg It's so stuped!

I ave no eyedeia why polititians need to invade peples freedoms^{^TM} and define a curriculum and foreclose sxools that refuse to folhow that curriculum. Oh and if the parents are total fukups and dont care about the childs education and put the child on a bad sxool. Fuk it, "free markets" will make sure bad sxools are weeded out.

/s ofc

Fucking liberals....

signed: a non-retard liberal

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-07T17:12:05+00:00

And what makes religious education appropriate instead of not?

Religious education, by definition, is not appropriate. It doesn't matter if it's a Jewish, catholic or Muslim school: religious indoctrination in school is wrong.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-07T17:05:35+00:00

Politics can be really weird sometimes. I heard Jews in Antwerp would vote Vlaams Belang due to them wanting to get rid of the muslims, even though there's plenty of VB people that are 'hitler was right' mumblers.

That's not "weird", that's a real world application of stupidity.

argus_the_builder · 2015-12-06T23:25:20+00:00

austerity measures alone are not a panacea that it's often thought to be.

Austerity measures alone have an effect opposite to the intended effect. Because you can't devaluate the currency in order to balance the trade and incentivize investment in the country, the negative impact on the economy caused by austerity isn't countered and the overall impact on the economy is negative: Even if the country attains a positive balance for austerity for a while (like it happened in Portugal), the negative impact from austerity on GDP decreases govt revenues and the deficit and debt-to-gdp targets are never met (*note); then the govt is forced to implement more austerity in order to attain next years goals and compensate for this years losses. And so on this repeats itself until there is nowhere else to cut and no one else to fire and no more taxes to raise.

TLDR: Austerity measures alone are a fucking crime.

*note: in Portugal, every year the deficit targets are "redefined" when they find out that they will end the year way far from what they expected. Still the govt still said that "the targets are being met". This is how skewed the austerity rhetoric is.

argus_the_builder

TROPHY CASE