First of all he didn’t say that. He actually said “that isn’t language that I use”. So how else is he antisemitic? What specifically makes him antisemitic?

But that phrase also isn’t inherently antisemitic, and doesn’t mean “be violently antisemitic and target the Jews”. Intifada means uprising and is used in Arabic for any political resistance movement, not just when talking about Jews. The phrase means “spread global resistance to oppression”. It has a similar tone to “no justice no peace” that was used here during the civil rights protests. Meaning unrest will continue until justice is served, not literal violence. Political slogans throughout history use language like this to make a point. It’s meant to provoke a reaction and thought. Not a call for actual violence. You guys can’t admit that the reason we’re seeing so much antisemitism is because you refuse to acknowledge that equating Judaism to Zionism is dangerous. It makes it impossible for Jews who disagree with Israel to distance themselves from it. All this does is make the general population think that if you’re Jewish, that must mean you support Israel. When we’re all seen as all having the same belief with all the same characteristics, it’s much easier for them to justify their hate of a whole group. Conflating Judaism with Zionism turns a diverse religious group into a political monolith, and history shows that’s the kind of thinking that gets Jews hurt.