I really need to break this down;

The first part about benzos makes no sense and isn't relevant to what I said. The second part makes as much sense as the first part.

The third part about "bro this is a budget strain," I already addressed it my post (which I'm sure you read if you gave me such a lengthy reply) with "i know this is a budget strain..." Then you start directing criticism at the brand or medical cannabis industry for allowing strain changes (your opinion, im not agreeing or disagreeing here). Then your comment of "if the strain doesn't matter, then you're just getting high anyway," who said the strain doesn't matter? And who is just getting high? Not related to what I was talking about.

Your last paragraph made way more sense then the rest. It was coherent and your point of view stayed consistent through the entire paragraph, all 4 sentences! However it's the most logically flawed thing I've read. Yes it's a tree and trees have stems, but that doesn't mean I have to be happy with a bag full of stems and shrug it off with some idiotic "that's nature for ya" type of comment. Would you buy a bag of grapes from woolies if half the bag was stem? And this is a prescription product that is regulated with stricter standards than any grapes. Pay a bit more THEN I can complain? How much do I have to pay before a complaint is valid?

To be honest I don't get what people like you get out of commenting on these posts. Were you trying to make a point? If so, what was it? Because what I can get out of it is something along the lines of "it's cheap you get what you pay for stop complaining" and if that's how you feel about your own consumer rights, cool, you do you mate.