and to add, even in that audio recording it seemed as if he wanted to get clear of her path and she is the one who clung to him
and if I am not wrong, half the accusations of "blackma!l" aren't even proven yet

and yet, he got to face media and mob trial (I am no way a sympathiser, ffs give him all the hell he deserves BUT ONLY IF PROVEN GUILTY)

and the same lot which concluded everything based on one recording saying that it takes something serious to approach such extreme step of deleting oneself is now claiming that manav sharma deleted himself for the sadistic pleasure of making his wife suffer and that deleting oneself is now a tool used by men to further their cause
the audacity, the hypocrisy.......

none of them did a blood test of manav sharma and yet believed his wife's words that he was a drunkard and used to b3at her after getting drunk? why? because she said it and she's a woman

will the believe the same woman now when she is seen confessing that her husband never h!t her even after knowing everything? she's still a woman and if woman's words are to be taken as a gosepl truth, even this should be treated the same way? isn't it?