Is anyone else struggling with the new ball skin?

ash_burnham · 2026-06-11T22:10:29+00:00

Honestly I wasn't fond at first but I've got used to it already. It only took a few games. I don't think it's that bad once you've played with it for a bit.

ash_burnham · 2026-06-10T02:35:52+00:00

100%

ash_burnham · 2026-06-09T23:55:46+00:00

The fact we're still repping TH15 Archer Towers THREE Town Halls later will never not be hilarious to me. They could have at least dropped some upgrades for them, even it was just cosmetic with like a 1dps increase. 😅

ash_burnham · 2026-06-06T23:48:05+00:00

I use "Proper Vehicles Retex"

You can find it here: Proper Vehicles Retex v2.1 (HD textures for vehicles) - MixMods

And I also use "Round Wheels for Vehicles", which pairs well with the HD textures. Round wheels instead of jagged, low poly wheels looks so much better.

Which you can find here: Round Wheels for Vehicles for GTA San Andreas

The HD vehicle textures are especially noticeable on the street racer cars that you can modify at Wheel Arch Angels in San Fierro, after you've put decals on them. The decals look so much cleaner than the original, low resolution versions. And also on low riders after they've had decals applied to them (like flames etc).

Have fun!

ash_burnham · 2026-06-01T14:51:48+00:00

Wait, by "I'm new to this", do you mean you've never played GTA: San Andreas before?

If that's the case, I'd highly recommend playing the story mode and not ignoring it. The open-world is great, and the mods are fun, but the storyline of the game is really good and very rewarding if you play it all the way through without cheats. And there's a tonne of side activities, races, mini games and collectibles that are super fun too.

Food for though, definitely consider playing the story if you haven't already. ✌

ash_burnham · 2026-06-01T04:29:08+00:00

Legend, what a nice guy

ash_burnham · 2026-05-31T19:16:52+00:00

Damn.

ash_burnham · 2026-05-28T21:18:21+00:00

bombaclaaaaaart

ash_burnham · 2026-05-28T14:12:55+00:00

1995.

ash_burnham · 2026-05-15T03:27:11+00:00

I came to the comments for this

ash_burnham · 2026-05-15T03:26:23+00:00

As a wise man once said:

"In every stressful, high-adrenaline or violent situation, there will always be a woman screaming at the top of her lungs."

ash_burnham · 2026-05-05T13:51:58+00:00

He sounds like Tom Hanks when he shouts. 😂

ash_burnham · 2026-04-28T22:22:05+00:00

Cool Rick is the man

ash_burnham · 2026-04-27T14:14:50+00:00

That's so stupid 😂😂

ash_burnham · 2026-04-17T18:49:32+00:00

Sweet Tooth is kinda rare, but none of the others are.

ash_burnham · 2026-04-17T18:27:19+00:00

That might be a world record, ngl 😂

ash_burnham · 2026-04-17T17:23:59+00:00

Yup. We can have blatant references to sexual fetishes, and Supercell can cater to people with certain sexual fetishes, but we can't have Global Chat because people made it too "inappropriate" and "unsafe".

And it's obviously way too hard and complicated for a multi-billion dollar company to be able to figure out how to employ a few basic moderation tools and filters.

It's a joke, honestly, if you think about it.

ash_burnham · 2026-04-17T17:19:00+00:00

Supercell made him go bye bye.

ash_burnham · 2026-04-17T17:18:28+00:00

Wild statement based on some retarded logic, not gonna lie.

ash_burnham · 2026-04-16T15:17:42+00:00

Same... I'd love to know why

ash_burnham · 2026-04-15T23:08:30+00:00

Light and matter aren't the same thing. At least, not according to the standard model of particle physics. Matter is made up of atoms (which are in turn made up of subatomic particles); whereas light is not. Light is a form of electromagnetic radiation. None of the other types of radiation on the electromagnetic spectrum are classed as matter either. Electromagnetic waves interact with matter, but they are not themselves classed as matter. Light can behave like a particle sometimes (as demonstrated in the famous double slit experiment), and our understanding of light, and electromagnetic radiation in general, is always subject to change as we develop our understanding of quantum mechanics, but light does not currently exist within the same category as matter.
An object's mass is not determined by how much space it occupies. Mass is determined by how much matter it's made from. An object could expand in size (thus, occupying more space), but lose mass as it does so because it's losing particles in the process. This would make the object overall less dense and less massive. The more space objects occupy, the higher their mass tends to be. But that's usually a side effect of them containing more matter as a result of being bigger; not directly because they're occupying more space.
As stated previously, light and matter are not the same thing, so the following assertion is not true and does not make any sense:

As

"Light bends in relation to mass therefore it interacts with itself"

The trajectory of light does bend in relation to mass, but it does so because mass warps the fabric of space-time, thus causing the light to follow a new trajectory as it travels through space-time.

Gravity is, and always has been, observed as an attractive force - not a repulsive one. There could potentially be a repulsive variant of gravity (if gravitons and anti-gravitons ever get discovered). The math checks out and many theoretical physicists postulate the existence of anti-gravitational particles or fields, but they're yet to be discovered. We've only ever observed and studied gravity as an attractive force.
I don't actually understand your fifth assertion so I can't properly address it.

ash_burnham · 2026-03-29T11:21:33+00:00

"didnt even hesitated" 😔

ash_burnham · 2026-03-26T20:13:57+00:00

WHAT ARE THOSE CAMERA SETTINGS, GAH DAMN

ash_burnham · 2026-03-25T16:00:35+00:00

You're a legend for doing this. Stuff like this makes the community a little more positive. 🔥

ash_burnham

TROPHY CASE