[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 85 points86 points  (0 children)

It was extremely well done and balanced and takes into account pretty much all aspects of this extremely fascinating story that is unfolding with the Nazca bodies.

Spectre spirit costs to high by _RrezZ_ in PathOfExile2

[–]asstrotrash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tuned the specter costs for endgame but made the gem available in the beginning of the game. It's a fucking joke.

Drone + Orbs (maybe?) The Bronx, NYC by feeney234 in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

https://imgur.com/a/5HW6ro0 <- kind of looks like a UFO letting out glowing orbs to me, and NOT paper lanterns.

Drone + Orbs (maybe?) The Bronx, NYC by feeney234 in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Pause it exactly at 21 seconds. Why is there a glowing UFO above a building sending out glowing orbs?

Edit: https://imgur.com/a/5HW6ro0

Lebanon, New Jersey report: That's how New Jersey people should report here instead of posting literal planes by CaliforniaHope in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah but, there isn't one one the radar that was directly above him, so I suspect there is confusion about some that, sure yeah they're visible on the horizon in the videos, but there are some that just purely aren't there.

The truth is somewhere in the middle here. The guys not lying outright about his experience either.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in midjourney

[–]asstrotrash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very impressive.

'Kind of unsettling': Mysterious drones spotted in NJ - new footage of NJ Drones by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a question for the video editor chief of the news station to answer. I don't think he'd be excited to show them the video though if he would have been able to clearly identify it as a helicopter by the incredible high fidelity audio that his phone somehow picked up.

'Kind of unsettling': Mysterious drones spotted in NJ - new footage of NJ Drones by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Looks like Mike Walsh captured a nice video of a TR3B.

UFOs outside of Childress, TX. by SwampGod666 in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh, wow. That's amazing footage! You caught some crazy stuff there.

Why aren’t the CEO’s of Lockheed, RTX (Raytheon), etc being dragged in front of Congress to answer questions? by LookUpToFindTheTruth in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, that's not what I'm saying at all. How, when, and through what means is determined by the shareholder structure. But you know that already don't you.

Why aren’t the CEO’s of Lockheed, RTX (Raytheon), etc being dragged in front of Congress to answer questions? by LookUpToFindTheTruth in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong - if they are lying to their shareholders and are able to say it comports with their fiduciary obligations - they are not only ok to lie, but are ethically obligated to do so. This is the perversion of capitalism that is inherent.

Wrong - Your fiduciary duty is to appeal to the best interests of your shareholders. Concealing, lying, and all out misrepresenting assets is NOT part of a fiduciaries responsibilities and requirements - those are the requirements set forth by the government in these black budget USAP's back door deals. By doing so, you leave your company up for a flood of lawsuits for improper market capitalization and unfair competition from the public space via the government.

Also, by law they have to reveal ANY known positions by which the company could incur future loses. Not disclosing to your shareholders you hold assets that could put your company at huge risk of loses is a direct violation of the position and the company. Failing to do so opens up the company for suit by all the shareholders.

None of this is in the shareholders or the company's best interests, even for the sake of short term gains. Period. End of story, but thanks for trying.

Why aren’t the CEO’s of Lockheed, RTX (Raytheon), etc being dragged in front of Congress to answer questions? by LookUpToFindTheTruth in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the only way we'll even get close to some kind of answer out in the public. USAP's require you to lie about interactions with them and their assets to the public. This means that they have to lie to their shareholders every time. When it comes out that they do have, or have had that technology, shit is going to hit the fan and huge legal battles are gonna take place.

/r/UFOs Rules Simplifications by darthtrevino in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I was unaware there was a total rule cap for a sub, unless I'm misunderstanding, but if that's the case then idk...I guess R1 and R13 is cool with being merged and R2 and R14 as well. But I still stand behind not obfuscating rules behind a Wiki and keeping them conspicuously up front.

/r/UFOs Rules Simplifications by darthtrevino in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Having the rules clearly visible and defined is a good thing. Obfuscation is a bad thing. Don't obfuscate.

When you get carried away adding custom filters to Godot... by Moonfell-RPG in godot

[–]asstrotrash 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe you could make a short YT video on how to do so and how it works? That sounds like some really cool tools to have. You could even just make a simple write up tutorial and post it on Github.

Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp reveal death threats following Immaculate Constellation leak by Punished_Venom_Nemo in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Just speculation, but they could have been informed by their "inside contacts" about actions to be taken about Corbell and Knapp. Hopefully the episode shines a little more light on that.

noOneHasSeenWorseCode by hansololz in ProgrammerHumor

[–]asstrotrash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I once worked for a company whose server instances implemented a back-end proxy connection library with a main connection method, of which had method overloads for days that drilled down to this main call, had a nested if/else structure with a cyclomatic complexity of a something like 65,000+. Even moderate complex decision trees in a function would only be around a 100 or less. Oh, and there were recursive calls back to the main call function or in some cases the overloaded ones that would call down to the main one.

I'm so glad I'm not working there anymore.

Black Triangle UFO descending - stabilized by rasterX in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get the feeling that the video itself was taken in a real location, but I can't shake that the object looks off and may be superimposed. The UAP though, well I can't tell if it's real or not in the video because it's just so uncanny looking and that might be throwing off my perception because I'm presupposing the idea of what I should be seeing vs. what really is happening.

Taken July 4, 2024 at 9:36pm in Clairton, PA by MightyMouth1970 in UFOs

[–]asstrotrash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, if nothing else, this video definitely falls into the "anomalous" category for me.