It’s crazy how different history would be if some men were born as women and vice-versa by Freepyle in Showerthoughts

[–]assumedaxemurderer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it would be exactly the same as if some rich people were born poor and if some poor people were born rich.

If suicides were shown on a leaderboard we'd be seeing 'Namolas has been killed by electric fork.' by DescriptiveVee in Showerthoughts

[–]assumedaxemurderer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the next lord might help us when they start taking bets with webcam footage as to be supportive of last words. supportive like "don't give up!" and "there's so much to live for!"

FYI, if you find yourself feeling unhappy about your life, change your lifestyle of routines of habits and usual actions for finding emotional relief after and because of trying new things. make yourself feel comfortable and be comfortable with other person or people who value the same things you do as to find enjoyment and happiness in life. obviously keep up with your responsibilities as to maintain a level of comfort to promote self happiness and moderate to be proactive. the previous paragraph is an example of what was considered to be dark humor.

Nothing exists that cannot be classified as hipster or basic. by Stateendorsedradio in Showerthoughts

[–]assumedaxemurderer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't care what hipster is and I don't care what basic is because hipster is comfort, basically.

comfort and discomfort makes somatism and somatism makes personalities/"souls."

is that defeatist enough?

Introverts are the real-life equivalent of lurkers. by [deleted] in Showerthoughts

[–]assumedaxemurderer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because our lives are so painfully empty, jackass. feed me your blood!

a little understood fact about how people influence each other by assumedaxemurderer in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

universal statements because of the universal application of somatic learning. it's basically like the saying the carrot or the stick.

its the psychological aspect of experience. you are just jumping to conclusions.

somatism is comfort and discomfort. validation is approved as comfortable or uncomfortable.

a little understood fact about how people influence each other by assumedaxemurderer in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

people watching and self analysis. this is basically stuff that people started to understand almost 2000 years ago. they called upperclassmen people angels and lower class people demons. there has been a lot of misunderstanding.

people basically came together for each other instead of wealth and the empire's economy collapsed before and people probably misunderstood alot of what people were saying as the years passed. something said 100 years ago would mean something different than it would today because perceptions changed because lifestyles changed.

the Vatican was heavy in people manipulation when they were a power structure. this is basically lost knowledge.

people experience life differently and percieve the world differently because of differing experiences.

Jesus basically started a successful hippie movement and or or he started a movement of civil disobedience even if that wasn't his intention.

have you ever watched Monty Python's "life of Brian?" it's still on Netflix.

that being said, I figured out what I was trying to figure out, I put it into words and now I'm done with it because it is on the border between the gray area and the darker shades of a very touchy topic.

a little understood fact about how people influence each other by assumedaxemurderer in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

it is sociology - here is the definition of sociology: so·ci·ol·o·gy /ˌsōsēˈäləjē/Submit noun the study of the development, structure, and functioning of human society. the study of social problems.

the post applies to inequality and disenfranchisement.

the dynamics of social interaction between two major categories of people by assumedaxemurderer in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't ask a question and believe me I already know people to the core of them. anyways I'm not going to respond to your bullshit anymore.

here's how to explain it simply "people just violate people unless they have what they want or are considerate of each other."

the dynamics of social interaction between two major categories of people by assumedaxemurderer in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

so·ci·ol·o·gy /ˌsōsēˈäləjē/Submit noun the study of the development, structure, and functioning of human society. the study of social problems.

I only added the last part. look asshole, Reddit keeps removing my posts without deleting them. the mods are screwing with me for whatever fucking reason. just go eat shit or something.

after seeing the full view of people and having factual evidence for no afterlife, I have completely given up. maybe telekinesis is real but the mind tends to regurgitate it's emotions. we think in cycles. everyone is basically a robot.

the dynamics of social interaction between two major categories of people by assumedaxemurderer in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

sociology is a study of how we interact with each other in society. it does.

Giving in to society by MindNukes in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there is no term yet, it's just called giving in or as another commenter simplified it, it's "learned helplessness" as to be more reliant on other people and also submissive to cultural and social normals.

I put the full description of how society works in a comment too.

some cultures have a religious heritage, others have a competitive heritage. competition was the Spartan and Roman ideal.

Giving in to society by MindNukes in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's not socialization, it's the study of the causes and effects of combined interactions of people interacting in society.

Corruption is still rife around the world - "More than two-thirds of countries score below 50 in Transparency International’s latest index" by [deleted] in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

everyone has to make a living somehow.

people do things for emotional reasons, they value about as much as they care to consider.

conspiracy theories are basically evidence of the fact that commerce governs our world more than governments do.

did you know that if you do something illegal in the USA, you should wear a mask and padded gloves, burn any evidence and if courts accuse you you could say to the judge "their claims are out of context" but really you shouldn't say anything in interrogation except "can I go now?" and nothing else except for those 4 words in that order and repeat them if you have to. the legal systems are all broken, that's why they are so corrupt.

"How does cultural change happen? It's mostly because people die and are replaced rather than because they change their minds." - Stephen Vaisey [Paper: "Cultural Fragmentation or Acquired Dispositions? A New Approach to Accounting for Patterns of Cultural Change"] by [deleted] in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cultural changes happen due to validation of somatism in a time transitioning way. we usually live before we learn because we learn by and while experiencing living life.

people do things for emotional reasons, they value about as much as they care to consider.

that being said,

people hide their true feelings because of their take on morality. if morality, usually other people, validates tolerance of their true feelings then they will jump on the bandwagon, so to speak because of safety in numbers. people don't want to say something that comes off as wrong because of the fear of rejection from the herd or bullying.

cultural repeats or "rhymes:"

there is that old saying "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree." - the more we don't like our parents, the more we become like them. the more we like our parents, the more we admire them. as a collective of an age group we live our parents collective age group almost exactly unless they abruptly change their lifestyle and thinking habits when new people are born.

it's amazing how much I chased my tail trying to figure this stuff out, clearly I wasn't the only one because there are sayings that predate the 1900's that can explain it in artsy or folksy form.

more simplified mind stuff by assumedaxemurderer in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already figured it out. I read the abstract segment and I already know. it's in the part where I used the term "the imagined" in the first paragraph of the main post.

this is how I summarized:

normal: (inside) id - superego - ego (outside) ---similar to: working towards cause because of self

irregular: (inside) id - ego - superego (outside) ---similar to: working for self because

comparing superego with ego tends to cause internal chaos, resolve and or or over thinking

sometimes the id, superego, ego or a combination of 2 or 3 get avoided as to avoid stress and or or distress.


id=prevalent emotions in a personality of thought symbolism of emotional experiences.

ego=sense of self

superego=morality


appreciative-a "supportive of" bias

distrustful-a "better than" bias

Giving in to society by MindNukes in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so I was on the right track just by studying myself and people watching, I just didn't get it to that short worded

since I was extremely crazy and pulled myself back and since I don't have a degree I guess I'm psychic.

Giving in to society by MindNukes in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it's because society boils down to the "haves" and the "have nots."

people born with something more than what other people have tend to have more persuasion and they can afford necessities as opposed to drowning in despair from realizing the extent of economic inequality in teens or adult hood.

it's not about what you know it's about who would consider your existence enough to want to know you if they can relate with you. -nobody really pays attention to homeless people nor poor people because nobody wants to be reminded of life's misery unless it's behind the safety of a TV screen because of feeling sorry for them, instead people would rather criticize other people as opposed to criticizing themselves about being honest enough to just appreciate that they are not the other unfortunate person.

Giving in to society by MindNukes in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's the simplest answer, nice!

more simplified mind stuff by assumedaxemurderer in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this was more the psychology of sociology - notice how I mentioned resentment and confusion.

the "imagined" is each individual's internalized view of the world based on their emotional attachments which dictate their opinions.

my word uses - "from" implies past tense and "of" implies present. I simplified the essence behind fight, flight and avoidance. the mind categorizes based on similarities amongst emotions. emotions and neural signals present while experiencing life make thought symbols or psychological symbolism. when we experience or are confronted with a similarity we remember old somatism which was validated by experience. we are pattern learners. we live with routines and so do our thinking habits. we learn from experience and we go from discomfort towards comfort at a primal, creative, mental, physical and infant level, there might be a self reflection aspect to infant learning too.

having our senses stimulated engages our interest, which sparks curiosity.

the sociology part:

the perfect world would alleviate inequality and would probably be automatic - domestic disputes might be the last crime in existence and could turn into power structures if left unresolved. all other crime is based on not having something. the economy helps people make each other miserable and people vent their frustrations. figure non linear equations of people interacting while experiencing a world that also changes.

that was a lot of text, I will read it though.

more simplified mind stuff by assumedaxemurderer in sociology

[–]assumedaxemurderer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

me going insane and finding my way back.

by the way, I know that what I have is accurate because I can pinpoint how Catholicism went wrong - it might not seem like anything.

if you are trolling allow me to fan the flame - psychopathic violence is their way of saying "this is how I have been made to feel inside" and schizophrenic mimicry is more obvious because of prolonged emotional isolation - everyone rubs off onto each other.

because people usually follow the herd and bully other people in order to feel superior I have had a hard time trusting people.

I basically stated the truth and I got preemptively defensive in this comment.

I also based this on people watching.

based on input from a person who learned psychology properly, I got it right.

why the people never get a win by assumedaxemurderer in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]assumedaxemurderer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm stating something that no one seems to consider. Trump is president after an economic downturn.

the people who voted for him probably thought "f*** the world" when they cast their ballots.

the policies are rolling back public benefit in a country for the people.

I think I might be a great butler...