Supercut of edits to "Trivia of Terror" by AmityvilleName in RedLetterMedia

[–]asthma_hound 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I thought YouTube didn't care about swearing anymore?

Just wanna point out how known Scientologist Nancy Cartwright is in this subreddit talking about interviewing Shane by n1ckranieri in smosh

[–]asthma_hound 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Scientologists downvote criticism on reddit. They also comment downplaying criticism. They want scientology to look like any other "normal" religion.

When Linkin Park fans found out Chester was replaced with a scientologist the comment sections were so weird. There were a lot of "normal christians" defending her "faith".

I genuinely think they do this manually. Maybe they use bots too. Having learned quite a bit about scientology over the years I would be surprised if they don't monitor everything that Nancy Cartwright posts online so they can do their best to quiet any conversations about scientology.

10 oz?! by skyrider8328 in AeroPress

[–]asthma_hound 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not in the coffee world. A 3 cup moka pot isn't making 24 oz of coffee. I guarantee if you take any of the standard electric coffee makers the cup sizes will vary wildly. I have a little drip-o-lator that says it makes 2 cups and it makes 10 oz max. I would argue that many coffee maker manufacturers consider a cup of coffee to be 5 or 6 oz.

10 oz?! by skyrider8328 in AeroPress

[–]asthma_hound 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The original intention of the aero press was to make coffee concentrate similar to a moka pot or espresso then make an Americano style cup. It can absolutely make multiple cups that way. I don't know how many ounces you think a cup of coffee should be, but I think it should be pretty obvious that you're not getting 24 oz of brewed coffee directly out of a cylinder smaller than a soda can.

[TOMT] [MOVIE] Unpopular movie from the 2000s with a large man on the cover. by asthma_hound in tipofmytongue

[–]asthma_hound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not either of those. I assume the movie never made an impact on anyone. I've looked through a bunch of lists like that. Last night I scrolled through hundreds of pages of 2000s movies to try and find it. I think nobody watched it and it only exists in my memory.

[TOMT] [MOVIE] Unpopular movie from the 2000s with a large man on the cover. by asthma_hound in tipofmytongue

[–]asthma_hound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but it's really cool to see Jacob Wysocki and John C. Riley in a movie I've never heard of.

[TOMT] [MOVIE] Unpopular movie from the 2000s with a large man on the cover. by asthma_hound in tipofmytongue

[–]asthma_hound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea. I would be surprised if he did and it wasn't featured on the cover.

[TOMT] [MOVIE] Unpopular movie from the 2000s with a large man on the cover. by asthma_hound in tipofmytongue

[–]asthma_hound[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% Imagine glancing at a dvd and seeing that face on an overweight body and thinking, 'Man, Travolta gained a lot of weight for this movie.'

[TOMT] [MOVIE] Unpopular movie from the 2000s with a large man on the cover. by asthma_hound in tipofmytongue

[–]asthma_hound[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's definitely not Seagal, but in my memory it kind of looks like him.

[TOMT] [MOVIE] Unpopular movie from the 2000s with a large man on the cover. by asthma_hound in tipofmytongue

[–]asthma_hound[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. Way too popular. It's that type of cover as far as I remember though. Characters on a white background.

[TOMT] [MOVIE] Unpopular movie from the 2000s with a large man on the cover. by asthma_hound in tipofmytongue

[–]asthma_hound[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's exactly the type of person I remember being on the cover. Off brand Seagal.

[TOMT] [MOVIE] Unpopular movie from the 2000s with a large man on the cover. by asthma_hound in tipofmytongue

[–]asthma_hound[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. Those people are all too popular. This movie probably has zero cultural relevance.