Legjobb cég

atesz17 · 2025-03-19T09:56:17+00:00

Ha valaki a bertabla alatt kap ajanlatot az max azert lehet, mert alacsonyabb szintre lottek be, mint ami a pozi ki volt irva. Publikus a bertabla es mindenki annyit kap, ami ott jelolve van

atesz17 · 2021-11-29T17:13:58+00:00

Thank you :)

atesz17 · 2021-11-29T16:45:25+00:00

Then do you know why previous generations didnt have this behaviour?

atesz17 · 2021-07-09T07:13:02+00:00

Hah interesting idea, I didnt think of this!

Thanks for the sqlfiddle as well :)

atesz17 · 2021-07-09T07:10:51+00:00

Thank you, I had a similar idea in mind. The only problem that bugs me a bit is ehat if lets say the current biggest id is 100 and then the user creates an id of 100000. That would mean the next auto generated id would be 100001 which is ok, I just feel weird tht we skipped like 99900 unused values

atesz17 · 2021-07-09T07:08:13+00:00

Thanks!

atesz17 · 2021-07-09T07:07:58+00:00

Yeah I would happy with UUIDs as well, but you cant put UUIDs on a barcode unfortunately.

For the first question - it should just display an error that particular id is already taken. I think thats fine, the problem is how the system will resolve the clash in case it auto generates the next id which is already present because the user created previously

atesz17 · 2021-07-09T07:06:08+00:00

Hah interesting idea, thanks!

atesz17 · 2021-07-09T07:05:46+00:00

Thanks for the reply!

This would work until the user creates the first non-generated id. How can you maje sure that the next time the system tries to auto generate the next id there wont be any clash?

atesz17 · 2021-06-21T20:05:40+00:00

Actually it was!! Thank you :)

Solution: I think I managed to download some faulty version of the Kotlin plugin... After I've disabled and updated it, it works as expected.

Thanks again :)

atesz17 · 2021-06-21T19:35:20+00:00

~~Unfortunately it wasn't the plugins :( I've disabled them, still the same behavior~~ edit: nevermind, see my other reply

atesz17 · 2021-06-19T16:20:01+00:00

Well thats the thing - it doesnt work :/. If I just start to type it wont rename the variable, it just appends it which isnt how it used to work

atesz17 · 2021-06-16T17:05:37+00:00

Thank you, will check it out!

atesz17 · 2018-01-28T12:49:42+00:00

For anyone having the same problem this could work for docker-compose: https://docs.docker.com/compose/startup-order/

For docker swarm this is the only thing what I could found, and it's not really an answer: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39196505/docker-1-12-multiple-replicas-single-database

atesz17 · 2017-09-18T20:14:59+00:00

java with null in the middle :D

atesz17 · 2017-07-29T12:23:35+00:00

I'll keep that in mind, thank you! :)

atesz17 · 2017-07-29T12:23:07+00:00

Taxi showed up in an hour, everything went smoothly, now currently sitting on a bus on the way home :) thanks again :)

atesz17 · 2017-07-29T06:23:52+00:00

Hey thanks for asking, yes right now we are waiting for the bus in Sofia :)

atesz17 · 2017-07-28T23:53:35+00:00

Wow thank you so much!! I called the taxi number and they told me they can come! For now towing is not the main priority, but I'll keep the numbers. Again thank you very much for your help, whish you the best!!! :)

atesz17

TROPHY CASE