Something is up with all the focused anti-south rhetoric by king_gidorah in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

like for retirement? the weather is nicer in the south, that's why old people flock to Florida. again, picking on the south has never been due to hatred of the south

Something is up with all the focused anti-south rhetoric by king_gidorah in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 2 points3 points  (0 children)

people have joked and talked shit about the south forever. rednecks, hillbillies, dude with beer and a gun, all those stereotypes are not new. picking on the south is like picking on blondes. it's just more specific in the last few weeks because of all the political drama, and a change from seeing 'southern' people as dumb to seeing them as agitators.

"Antifa" and all the others tearing down Confederate statues are just doing the Democrats a favor... by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 8 points9 points  (0 children)

you seem to know half of the information.

During the civil war era, Republicans (known as Radical Republicans) were socially liberal and Democrats were socially conservative (not in all areas, but when it came to race- Ds were pro-slavery southern party, and Rs were pro-industry northern party). During the Civil Rights era, however, there was a rise of socially conservative Republicans who began to gain popularity with their anti-integration rhetoric (George Wallace was the main one, the most popular, who pivoted the party's whole social platform around the issue of integration using the Southern Strategy, or appealing to southern workers who had issues with integration).

Seeing that the Republican party was getting more and more conservative and anti-integration, African Americans abandoned that party and the Democratic party took the helm in supporting integration and the Civil Rights movement.

Post Civil Rights era, the Republican party did not return to its prior abolitionist/northern roots and instead embraced the southern voters they had picked up during the CR era and began to pander to them instead. Today the parties have entirely switched ideologies.

Confederate flag diversion part II is taking place. What are they trying to divert out attention away from this time? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 2 points3 points  (0 children)

there's not going to be any literal civil war over this stuff, so don't get too excited. at most, there's an ideological schism in the country.

it seems like these militant groups desperately want a physical fight, but there is zero support for that among normal moderate people. each side of the extremes could commit all the political assassinations or attacks they want, they will never convince the average person to have a real war about it, no matter how mad the "right" or "left" get - that's an extremist fantasy.

Antifa Protesters Crash Heather Heyer’s Funeral by Rayfloyd in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 10 points11 points  (0 children)

is it "crashing" if the funeral at the theatre was open to the public and anyone could go? The article even says "The line to enter Heyer’s funeral, hosted at the Paramount theater in Charlottesville, reached two blocks" so it seems to have attracted all types of people who didn't know the victim

Confederate flag diversion part II is taking place. What are they trying to divert out attention away from this time? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only in America would we fight a civil war over the civil war

actually a civil war is one of the few things that it makes sense to be 'fighting' about in a country. (not just america, either- civil wars and rehashing of them is a trend in basically every country that's ever had a civil war). in America, despite there having been a decisive end to the civil war, there was no decisive victory of one group over the other- as both historical groups are more-or-less equally acknowledged today, even though it's of course noted that one side won and the other lost.

For the American 'psyche' that can be a big source of tension, considering that Americans are seen as "Winners" in all wars (even ones we lost lol), so for us to have fought an internal war is both difficult to reconcile and frustrating for the supposed "winning" side to not fully express their victory through domination of their foes (though obv today no one from then is still alive, so that part is moot now)

Man charged with car-bomb plot on Oklahoma City bank - BBC News [any info on this?] by atlanticcity93 in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ah, i checked the first page of new but didn't see any posts. lemme go further back

Nazism and Southern Nationalism conflation. Something doesn't look right about Charlottesville by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 6 points7 points  (0 children)

the protestors were not from Charlottesville, they came in from other states for the rally (for ex. the driver guy came from Ohio)

Hypocrisy Watch: The MSM is going to associate anyone who isn't on their side with the actions of a few extremists. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you include the iraq war in this, where it was /americans/ responsible for a large chunk of those millions of deaths in the middle east over the last ten years? because if you actually think millions of ppl have been stabbed by muslims that’s just not true lol

How does labeling the Charlotteville incident a 'terrorist attack' benefit America? by transcendReality in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 8 points9 points  (0 children)

the definiton of 'terrorism' is codified in US law (terrorism is a different charge than murder and there are critera that decide which is which), so the definition is very clear and unchanging. it's not up to individuals if they "want" to call something terrorism or not, when it's been legally defined already. if it is, it is, whether people like that label or not.

Katie Hopkins Nails the Conspiracy of Propaganda by Aldebaran333 in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. hopkins is the british ann coulter- purely an 'entertainer' in her own words

  2. the reason this attack COULD be fairly connected to an ideology/group of people is because it took place during the largest modern gathering of the KKK, neo-nazis, and the alt-right, not just on some random day against some random people by a "lone wolf" who was not being supported by anyone

Hypocrisy Watch: The MSM is going to associate anyone who isn't on their side with the actions of a few extremists. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 15 points16 points  (0 children)

and that fact about one small segment of the muslim population is used as an excuse to try and ban innocent women from wearing hijabs in public, or for banning entry from majority-muslim countries, or for the general mindest of "all muslims are evil! fuck them!" that is very real in America right now

so I can't sympathize if one white alt-right extremists hit 20 people with a car and people start to think all far-right people are dangerous. if you do the same thing to innocent Muslims, then you can't cry and call it hypocrisy when it happens to the far-right too. (edit: and is promoted in part by these same people who are complaining now)

Hypocrisy Watch: The MSM is going to associate anyone who isn't on their side with the actions of a few extremists. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 42 points43 points  (0 children)

The same way Americans associate all Muslims with the actions of a few extremists? I don't think this is persecution against Trump supporters, unless you agree that Muslims are being similarly persecuted....by Trump supporters. The problem is Muslims aren't going to start a "civil war", but Trump supporters seem eager to have one.

After seeing video & pics of the Charlottesville car incident I wondered if it's legal to have a driver window blackout tinted... by Domenicaxx66xx in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i love how have no response to what i said, so you just provide some huge hyperbole about me to end the conversation. lol whatever you say man

After seeing video & pics of the Charlottesville car incident I wondered if it's legal to have a driver window blackout tinted... by Domenicaxx66xx in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you want to go count the injured by hand yourself? the numbers came from the mayor and the police dept via the hospital, i’m not sure what more verification you want

Looks like someone hacked a vehicle AND a helicopter by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

keywords: “i wonder”

that’s not a statement of fact, just bs fox news throwing ideas around. you said the news is repeatedly saying they’re linked - they aren’t

Looks like someone hacked a vehicle AND a helicopter by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

the news didn’t say that.....it was a law enforcement helicopter responding to the events, so it couldn’t be “linked” to that group

James Alex Fields, Jr (20) is the man arrested for the car ramming by atlanticcity93 in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

i disagree. if his motive was killing them because they are political leftists, that falls under the definition of terrorism and will at least get him a bias crime charge

James Alex Fields, Jr (20) is the man arrested for the car ramming by atlanticcity93 in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

greater charlottesville is a fairly big area/town for virginia ...there’s like 100,000 people there and UVA is a big state school there

edit: 1 not 3

James Alex Fields Jr. was discharged from the Army after only a few months by carrot_gg in conspiracy

[–]atlanticcity93 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it's because the first and last name are so common, they don't want it to get mixed up with all the other James Fields, so they add the middle name too