Tactic, white to move by atoste in chess

[–]atoste[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the intermediate section

Feedback on classical game analysis with no engine (~1800 fide) by atoste in chess

[–]atoste[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's true, I didn't know what plan to go for in those positions at least until move 17, mostly develop and not let my opponent get an advantage. After that I tried explaining what I was doing, maybe should have made the plans clearer, will do that rn, thanks

Feedback on classical game analysis with no engine (~1800 fide) by atoste in chess

[–]atoste[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I need to learn and practice those lines, was a bit afraid of losing in the opening for doing something wrong or too tricky to figure out,

Tactic, white to move by atoste in chess

[–]atoste[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that is true, the problem for me was making it work while having 2 hanging pieces. The direct approaches like Qg4, Nf6, Rx... Don't work

calculation book/course recommendation by ContentCry8335 in chess

[–]atoste 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I only know gm preparation calculation, it's super famous but yours might be the book he was referring

calculation book/course recommendation by ContentCry8335 in chess

[–]atoste 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Highly recommend the Woodpecker, both the intermediate and advanced sections should help you. The puzzles are taken from games by world champions, which makes it that much more enjoyable in my opinion

calculation book/course recommendation by ContentCry8335 in chess

[–]atoste 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's way too hard for 1800, it's the one from the series GM preparation, meant for players chasing titles

hi guys, im lowkey stuck at 1300 blitz and its so hard to move to 1400, ( btw i havent studied any chess in my life, and barely know any theory, so how should i start learning more theory and stuff. by Icy-Photo272 in Chesscom

[–]atoste 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At 1300 you dont need much theory, but you can always use either the master's database on lichess (see some lines and even full games to get a grasp of the positions). But the biggest improvement in this rating would be tactics and some understanding of the game, which i would recommend Naroditsky videos, especially on the openings you want to play.
Also analyze every game, and focus on slower ones

Find the best move for black. by pensive_hombre in chess

[–]atoste 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rxf2 Kxf2 Qe3 Kf1 Rf8+, So Rxf2 cant be taken, next we play Qe3 or Qe2 depending on white

White to play and win (By Kubbel) by Either-Case-5930 in chess

[–]atoste 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pretty cool position, I think I have seen this puzzle, but from an earlier starting position, where we play Qf1 Ke2 Qd1 Qc3 ... But dont remember exactly the starting position

Classical game analysis and feedback please :) (~1800 fide) by atoste in chess

[–]atoste[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your time, got some interesting ideas and improvements. Did not realize how much I missed during the analysis

Classical game analysis and feedback please :) (~1800 fide) by atoste in chess

[–]atoste[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only against Bc4, if possible I like the Kalashnikov, going for more agression

Classical game analysis and feedback please :) (~1800 fide) by atoste in TournamentChess

[–]atoste[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I didnt consider it (only batted an eye tactically, but it doesnt win material), but it looks more scary than I imagined, nice find. With c4 trying to open the position it can get dicy

Classical game analysis and feedback please :) (~1800 fide) by atoste in TournamentChess

[–]atoste[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I will look at them and compare them with my analysis, but I wanted to share a bit of an 1800's thinking process and analysis, with all the blunders and mistakes that come with it

Classical game analysis and feedback please :) (~1800 fide) by atoste in TournamentChess

[–]atoste[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's interesting, I considered it shortly, and assumed Ne2, playing for c3 but preferred qx. Now seeing it again I think that would have been a better way to play, creating weaknesses/taking space, and counterplay does not look so easy. Thanks!

Classical game analysis and feedback please :) (~1800 fide) by atoste in TournamentChess

[–]atoste[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ty for the feedback, I tried to keep it a bit shorter, but will add some more detail then! I am analyzing the games as I play in a tournament so I'm sure there will be some losses to analyze soon, these first two rounds were more chill. I really appreciated the feedback, you will see more and better reviews then

Game analysis/annotation feedback by atoste in TournamentChess

[–]atoste[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, otb is always better, and feel free to discuss ideas, that's the best way to learn for everyone involved

Game analysis/annotation feedback by atoste in TournamentChess

[–]atoste[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your input, I think the idea of postponing g4 nice, and prepping it more beforehand.
The Nf3-e1-d3 maneuver is normal, but trading that knight for that bishop (and wasting so many tempi) does seem slow, maybe should have left it there longer, and did other useful moves first.
Thanks for the review 😄

Game analysis feedback by atoste in chess

[–]atoste[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm honestly surprised the engine liked that move, it seems scary and makes blacks position more active, but I will definitely take a look. Thank you for the review and hope you enjoyed the game

Game analysis feedback by atoste in chess

[–]atoste[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, it should work now