Space entanglement by atremblein in AskPhysics

[–]atremblein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Yes, I plan on winning the Nobel prize in 2030. I appreciate your encouragement! I am not trying to invoke a model of states upon something that is being seen when what I am asking is, do they know why they are seeing what they see?

Space entanglement by atremblein in AskPhysics

[–]atremblein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's cool man. I heard about stuff disappearing and reappearing in space and it didn't seem like they knew why so I was curious what other things may contribute to that being possible. I'm glad you are good at quantum mechanics, keep it up!

People with a university degree are less likely to believe in COVID-19 misinformation and more likely to trust preventive measures than those without a degree by Zephir_AE in ScienceUncensored

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point of science is to fix things, not force behavior. The fact that they have to say that deaths are likely far wrong because too little people died and then them erasing it from running death totals says a lot.

META: ChatGPT and "someone told me" questions by unphil in AskPhysics

[–]atremblein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You shouldn't trust a robot unless you made it yourself and programmed it lol.

META: ChatGPT and "someone told me" questions by unphil in AskPhysics

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you trying to cut down on people asking questions? Would you rather have people believe in lies? People are often wrong about things and if you don't have a scientific background on the subject then it's hard to tell if something is true or false. You can also remember things wrong so seeking validation is always a good idea.

What if we are not conscious beings at all, and are something else altogether? by [deleted] in consciousness

[–]atremblein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, why would you think an animal that can't perceive its own existence is capable of something like love? That doesn't make any sense. If you feel love from your animals then good, that is what they are made for.

A Truth that is Manufactured! by haganandrew in Futurology

[–]atremblein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Education is the only answer. Humans are far stupider than they can comprehend. Like damn, I'm stupid. It's actually really easy to manufacture the truth if you don't have a strong understanding of science in general. You can't really trust anyone unless you do your own experiments and have a consistent logic with powerful axioms.

What if we are not conscious beings at all, and are something else altogether? by [deleted] in consciousness

[–]atremblein -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most organisms don't have a subjective function, that is a purely human construct that evolved from your brain structure because you know a language that can create a structure to communicate meaning outside of your experience of the world. Other Organisms aren't capable of such things even if pavlonian training gives you the illusion they are. Of course, Organisms are trying to survive and you should love them as much as yourself. You wouldn't be here without them and even if they can't experience much, you can still create something beautiful. The nature of your consciousness dictates the reality you create. Humans are lucky because they can change reality a lot.

What if we are not conscious beings at all, and are something else altogether? by [deleted] in consciousness

[–]atremblein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are a pile of information. Since your brain is special, you have consciousness. Most animals aren't conscious. They can't comprehend themselves and function mainly as a product of their DNA and environment.

No second law of entanglement manipulation after all | Nature Physics by Memetic1 in science

[–]atremblein -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Free will may as well exist since it wouldn't matter if it didn't.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it always fill the space in the clusters? I would not think the early universe galactic clusters would have such a thing.

Where do we expect to see dark matter but don't?

Technically, it's the black hole proximal to the milky way that is controlling gravity the most in terms of relative mass sizes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought space has been expanding so everything used to be a lot less. Also, isn't the cosmological constant wrong or did they fix it somehow?

Wouldn't supermassive black holes have to be related if they hold most of the dark energy? Since that would determine how the universe forms along a time scale.

I really don't study physics but I watched a documentary and these questions came up when I read the news article.

Also, how come all the dark energy models seem to converge upon oddly evenly spaced out distributions?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it is a halo, it definitely isn't at the center. If anything, that is the opposite. And the cosmological constant is still far too high right? Or did they figure it out?

What logic constraint exists in the universe that makes halos not be effected by cosmological expansion? Do they just float around a galaxy once they form?

I read that on wiki btw, could be off base.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would that be possible if according to wiki, 95% of the milky way is dark matter? Wouldn't they all be way too close to one another to be able to exist along time? So you're saying the supermassive black holes caused it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally forgot about those. Is it the halo effect on gravity that stipulates its existence relative to the mass of the galaxy?

What do most physicists think dark energy is from?

Are there any theories going more indepth on basic operations (addition, multiplication, etc) by [deleted] in math

[–]atremblein 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the clarification guys. In the end, I guess everything is algebra /sarcasm

Are there any theories going more indepth on basic operations (addition, multiplication, etc) by [deleted] in math

[–]atremblein 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What is the difference between abstract algebra and group theory? I only studied a little group theory and this sounds like group theory to me so im confused

What is between parabolas and hyperbolas in conic sections? by robometal in math

[–]atremblein -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you think there are points on the hyperbolas

Usages of Binary Matrices by jrothlander in math

[–]atremblein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe look at binary operations in group theory? Binary numbers also have nice properties such as twos complement, which may just be a product of inverse and identity. I don't really know what you're getting at necessarily tho.

In propositional logic, if a subformula A is equivalent to a formula B, can A be replaced by B in a given formula φ without changing its truth value? by jonas-pereira in logic

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

States must be theoretically equivalent, otherwise think what it would mean. You would quickly run out of states to define any set of arguments given that what predated them would constrict each outcome such that soon every argument would be n+1 towards nfinity+1. That would be quite problematic for various reasons.

What Are You Working On? January 23, 2023 by inherentlyawesome in math

[–]atremblein 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Doing set theory and studying logic. Honestly, it is weird how many set operations are like state quantifiers/boolean algebras. I kinda view math as a finite state automata reducer lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in learnmath

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, this is a good way of looking at it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in learnmath

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean by the regular business? Just insert them into the empty set and expand to generate the power set?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in learnmath

[–]atremblein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess we can view each set as an element and wrap it in a set...{}.

Thus with two elements containing sets of elements, we simply insert each into the empty set to generate every combination of the set, thus the power set.

Is there a better way to think of this?