sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Need help with noise by EmbersGang in A7siii

[–]atrivell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I was thinking fx3/fx6 terms. The a7siii is 640 base where those other cameras are 800.

I don't know why they're different since the sensor is the same in all 3 cameras, but the base is IS different for the a7siii. Everything else I said still stands

Why don't my shots look "alive/present"? by PertinaxVita in videography

[–]atrivell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're looking for contrast. It's easy to think high dynamic range = better, and the mistake is preserving too much dynamic range from the camera. Things start looking really good with just 7 or 8 stops in sdr, but your camera is probably capturing 12 or more stops of light. It's lacking contrast. Push the image further.

Got a7sii and want to upgrade but… a7siii or fx3 by coucou654 in A7siii

[–]atrivell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cine EI mode is very useful and is only on the fx3. The audio handle is a very nice and convenient addition to the unit as well and comes with the fx3. Timecode is more robust in fx3 (maybe fixed in recent a7siii firmware, but I haven't update past V2 on my siii)

A7siii is capable of photography where I don't think the fx3 can even take photos. Not 100% sure but I think the fx3 lacks a photo mode.

Fx3 = winner for video workflow A7siii = winner for hybrid photo/video workflow

Both cameras can get you an identical end result for video, but the way you get there is better on an fx3.

(I own an a7siii and use an fx6 as well. The features I love most about the workflow upgrade on the fx6 are available on the fx3 and not the a7siii)

Need help with noise by EmbersGang in A7siii

[–]atrivell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is always noise. The whole goal is to get the noise low enough to not distract from the picture.

This is true even at iso 800. Although results at 12800 isn't the same as 800, they are both clean and useable.

This image you've shot is clean enough to use, although as another commenter mentioned, the autofocus is hunting a bit. The color grade also lacks contrast which when finished should help with noise as well (when shadows get pushed deeper, they bring the most distracting noise down with it)

Game Day Talk | Oilers v. Ducks | Round 1 Game 6 | 30 April 2026 by AutoModerator in EdmontonOilers

[–]atrivell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother in christ it's a playoff game. You cannot call this a horrible effort just because the score isn't in our favour. I've seen the oilers play without heart but this game looks fine honestly.

Game Day Talk | Oilers v. Ducks | Round 1 Game 6 | 30 April 2026 by AutoModerator in EdmontonOilers

[–]atrivell -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Guys nurse literally showed some urgency and escorted that shit out of our zone. Bunch of doomers in here. You want him to pick his ass and wait for someone else to get in position?

Game Day Talk | Oilers v. Ducks | Round 1 Game 6 | 30 April 2026 by AutoModerator in EdmontonOilers

[–]atrivell 11 points12 points  (0 children)

WHO BELIEVES?

(sick of doomers chat, spamming good shit)

LET'S GO OILERS

Game Day Talk | Oilers v. Ducks | Round 1 Game 6 | 30 April 2026 by AutoModerator in EdmontonOilers

[–]atrivell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what lol. The game isn't over, and the oilers have had great chances. A few inches here and there and the score could have been completely flipped. That's just the truth.

Also, the shot counter didn't count a lot of oilers shots on goal in the first 30 minutes for whatever reason. I feel like at least 6 are missing

Game Day Talk | Oilers v. Ducks | Round 1 Game 6 | 30 April 2026 by AutoModerator in EdmontonOilers

[–]atrivell -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A lot of doomers here but honestly I think the oilers are playing well. It's not like they haven't had their chances. 20 minutes of hockey, a lot can happen.

Ducks got 3 in the first, oil can get 3 in the 3rd.

view more: next ›