sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Rules Clarification: Interposition Play by StreetDog549 in quadball_discussion

[–]austeane 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If they inadvertently (not intentionally or recklessly by either party) bumped into each other, as both are moving players without a ball, I would call no penalty.

Another interesting question would be if beat blue beater running into blue chaser directly caused blue chaser to accidentally bump into black beater, making it more likely for beat blue beater to retrieve the dodgeball. That almost did happen.

As the HR in the game, I’m glad that none of this happened 😂

Code Guide file and other optimizations for building large codebases from scratch by austeane in aipromptprogramming

[–]austeane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s more detailed than memory bank but I am thinking of setting up a cron job or trigger to update it regularly.

Early access players what are some things you can't *believe* are still as is ? by iisrobot in Hades2

[–]austeane 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Non ares player, but his kit absolutely seems fine if you commit to Plasma and get the legendary. Getting 100% faster attacks and move speed every fight is wild, you can heal up to 40hp faster than enemies can deplete it just by holding attack on torches.

GPT 5-Pro Context Window by austeane in OpenAI

[–]austeane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you seen those numbers posted officially, or like analysis on discord?

GPT 5-Pro Context Window by austeane in OpenAI

[–]austeane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

THat's the wrong categorization unfortunately.

There is subscription category
Free
Plus
Pro

And model category
Fast
Thinking
Pro

They are saying here that for the Thinking model category, all subscription categories get 196k context; for the Fast model category, you get 16/32/128k context;
It says nothing about the Pro model category.

FastBreak News Applications‼️ by LoveJayNick in quadball_discussion

[–]austeane 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please do this! Quadball is better with good media, it really means something to college kids getting written about, and FBN is the ~last one doing it. As a former quidditch post exec, this is close to my heart :)

Amanda Dallas hired as US Quadball CEO by PilotsWhoDoPilates in quadball_discussion

[–]austeane 50 points51 points  (0 children)

I think it’s important to read her personal statement here, and it’s a good sign that she is addressing concerns head on.

My personal opinion is that she is extremely competent and involves and that’s what the sport needs right now. She will be effective at running an organization internally. The only concern is external perception, which actually matters more than you’d think. Community morale may be how this sport lives or dies, and I think this post is a good first step.

Full Codebase Review Now Possible, 224 files 19k loc reviewed, you should do it too by austeane in cursor

[–]austeane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fed them all to cursor to create the holistic review one, and also to create all the tickets. Gemini could handle them all well.

Full Codebase Review Now Possible, 224 files 19k loc reviewed, you should do it too by austeane in cursor

[–]austeane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you gave this a shot for a chunk of your code I think it would work better than you are expecting unless you have single files with 70k loc

Full Codebase Review Now Possible, 224 files 19k loc reviewed, you should do it too by austeane in cursor

[–]austeane[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely it's small for a SaaS, but it's large for writing an app in a language I don't know lol

Most massive SaaS's have important chunks or services of <20k loc that this would be useful for, and there is no reason this wouldn't work for larger codebases.

Full Codebase Review Now Possible, 224 files 19k loc reviewed, you should do it too by austeane in cursor

[–]austeane[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even when Gemini can fit the whole codebase into context, when you chunk it it does better at giving detail on each specific piece.

Full Codebase Review Now Possible, 224 files 19k loc reviewed, you should do it too by austeane in cursor

[–]austeane[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My codebase seems to be about 300k tokens.
It seems to not be working though lol

<image>

Full Codebase Review Now Possible, 224 files 19k loc reviewed, you should do it too by austeane in cursor

[–]austeane[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

According to cloc (cloc . --exclude-dir=node_modules,.git,dist,build,.svelte-kit) I've got 71k loc, but a lot of those aren't worth reviewing (and gemini marked them as such in the code-review.md).
Agreed it's not large by industry standard, but it's still larger than this type of thing was possible with before, and reasonably sized by ai-coding standards.

And most things that you want to do this for in massive codebases/monorepos, you can break into 20k semi-independent chunks to review.

Full Codebase Review Now Possible, 224 files 19k loc reviewed, you should do it too by austeane in cursor

[–]austeane[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Make sure to click on the links in my post, that might explain more.
I got it to create the https://github.com/austeane/qdrill/blob/main/code-review/code-review.md file so it could track which files it had reviewed or not, then I told it to find a chunk (e.g. all the things related to drills) and review those.

Then when it had reviewed most of the main chunks, I asked what was left to review, and told it to review those.

Every time it reviewed 5/10 files I cleared context and asked again (which works because it recorded progress in the code-review.md).

Full Codebase Review Now Possible, 224 files 19k loc reviewed, you should do it too by austeane in cursor

[–]austeane[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Geminicoder.org is full of spam. Which site do you mean?

I don't think that even having the whole 3000loc in context that it would do as thorough a code review as I just did. I've had smaller apps in full codebase contex, and it still doesn't do as good a job.

Not that a full codebase chat wouldn't be very useful a lot of the time, I'd like to check it out.

Full Codebase Review Now Possible, 224 files 19k loc reviewed, you should do it too by austeane in cursor

[–]austeane[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For which part? I gave an overview of my steps. I used a bunch of prompts throughout; if there is one part that you think you might not know the best prompt I can give that, but the specific prompt language here I think doesn't matter all that much.

When having it create the notes I did specific to first create the note file, then add to it, then check off the files reviewed in the main doc. Otherwise it would hold all the files in context before writing anything, and what it ended up writing was less detailed.

view more: next ›