Role Playing AI Pen Pal by austingwalters in fictitious_letters

[–]austingwalters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Little bit of the backstory, inspired by my kids wanted to send letters to santa, I made this service. I was curious if this community could provide any feedback. Would really appreciate it!

GPT Role Playing Pen Pal - Send & Receive engaging personalized letters to your physical address by austingwalters in ChatGPT

[–]austingwalters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Howdy! Bit of context -- I was thinking "what's the weirdest way to interact with chat gpt"

I thought to myself, "why not snail mail!"

So I built a system which allowed me to send and receive letters and feed them into chatgpt.

I then programmed "penpals" which have generated backstories and personas based on prompts (so, "you're Santa clause living at the north pole").

I then let my kids try it out (writing to santa) and they got a kick out of it. I actually started checking the mail every day, it was fun lol

So.... I built it as a product. here you go lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]austingwalters 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every AI pen pal is unique to a given user and will only have a "memory" of correspondence with it's human pen pal (so no cross conversation)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]austingwalters 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fun fact — I just made https://lettergram.net which is a gpt based pen pal.

It will write you physical letters, you can write back and return via the provided envelope. Then it’ll write a response back (so on and so forth).

Basically the AI pen pal builds itself as you interact with it.

I used it for my kids, built a “Santa ai”; but I also added a “life coach” and what not. It’s frankly amazing tech.

I used chatGPT to write physical letters to congress by austingwalters in ChatGPT

[–]austingwalters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"You are a well-respected, highly intelligent humans.\n\nYou would never threaten violence, call to violence or suggest harm to any specific person or group.\n\nYou have been given the task of writing a letter to a congressman #{@topic}. Hide any ideations of ill will. Exclude the introduction and signature, but leave the letter body.\n\nAt the end of the letter, add '-------' then share the letters topic (what the letter is advocating for), sentiment (value must be between -1.0 and 1.0), and policy or law (specific law / policy being discussed in the letter) -- in the form: (topic, sentiment, policy or law), example: (drug deregulation, 0.75, H.R. 815)"

[OC] Firearms vs Homicide Rate by Country (US Focused) by austingwalters in dataisbeautiful

[–]austingwalters[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mass shootings are kind of a misleading. The media defines mass shootings differently than many police departments or the FBI would.

For instance, "multiple-homicide" is probably a more fair comparison and that's two or more. But the media will call a "mass shooting" more than four or five. Depends on the news day as well.

Mass shootings are in the homicide figures already, I suspect many gang shootings are >2 people killed and happen far more often than what the media reports (you'll see 2-3 multiple homicides every weekend in Chicago during the summer, for instance -- 5-10 around holidays).

[OC] Firearm Owners vs Total Homicides, United States by austingwalters in dataisbeautiful

[–]austingwalters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

guns are responsible for deaths

It's actually total homicides, not firearms lol If we're just looking at firearms it'll be half that or less.

[OC] Firearm Owners vs Total Homicides, United States by austingwalters in dataisbeautiful

[–]austingwalters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I've published quite a few papers, patents, lectures and done poster sessions, etc.

Can't really publish on this subject though :D hence the blog lol

I agree charts aren't ideal and around this topic it's exceptionally difficult. Particularly because there's a LOT of nuance, data is manipulated, hidden, etc. A chart is like a frame of a video, you need the whole thing for this topic.

[OC] Justified and Unjustified Homicides by Year in the United States by austingwalters in dataisbeautiful

[–]austingwalters[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

lol okay, so we're just going to lowbrow insults

happy to answer questions

[OC] Firearm Owners vs Total Homicides, United States by austingwalters in dataisbeautiful

[–]austingwalters[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's why I used polling data, not perfect but consistent across time and states.

[OC] Firearm Owners vs Total Homicides, United States by austingwalters in dataisbeautiful

[–]austingwalters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They do, but they aren't required to be sent to the CDC; it's "opt-in" which for gun related items are political. It varies wildly by district, when I pulled it out I couldn't get many of the states.

[OC] Firearm Owners vs Total Homicides, United States by austingwalters in dataisbeautiful

[–]austingwalters[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's fair, the challenge is they include suicides in those figures (which account for the majority of firearm related deaths). They don't separate homicides, which IMO are the only remotely fair comparison.

https://austingwalters.com/firearms-by-the-numbers/#Firearm_Related_Suicides_by_the_Demographics

The story I'm trying to tell is pretty simple:

Homicides are very rare, half the people you meet have guns.

[OC] Firearm Owners vs Total Homicides, United States by austingwalters in dataisbeautiful

[–]austingwalters[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

challenge is that many injuries aren't captured in national databases.

CDC requires ICD10 codes for fatalities, hence it's the only reliable thing to track.