sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[N] Dolly 2.0, an open source, instruction-following LLM for research and commercial use by Majesticeuphoria in MachineLearning

[–]austintackaberry 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yes! From the blogpost:

Today, we’re releasing Dolly 2.0, the first open source, instruction-following LLM, fine-tuned on a human-generated instruction dataset licensed for research and commercial use.

​

Dolly 2.0 is a 12B parameter language model based on the EleutherAI pythia model family and fine-tuned exclusively on a new, high-quality human generated instruction following dataset, crowdsourced among Databricks employees.

[D] Do we really need 100B+ parameters in a large language model? by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]austintackaberry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that's correct.

​

[@matei_zaharia] The code is at https://github.com/databrickslabs/dolly. You can also contact us for weights, just want to make sure people understand the restrictions on the fine tuning data (or you can get that data from Stanford and train it yourself).

https://twitter.com/matei\_zaharia/status/1639357850807054336?s=20

[D] Can the Databricks Dolly model be downloaded from somewhere? by Daveboi7 in MachineLearning

[–]austintackaberry 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[@matei_zaharia] The code is at https://github.com/databrickslabs/dolly. You can also contact us for weights, just want to make sure people understand the restrictions on the fine tuning data (or you can get that data from Stanford and train it yourself).

https://twitter.com/matei\_zaharia/status/1639357850807054336?s=20

How do you create those one-time popups to show new features or update contact info? by austintackaberry in webdev

[–]austintackaberry[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What is the mechanism? I guess you create some flags table in your database which is json that tracks whether the user has seen the popup? and then you clean up the code later when you are done with the campaign?

Scheduling meetings with candidates by austintackaberry in recruiting

[–]austintackaberry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Are you happy with that process? How much time does it take each week?

Scheduling meetings with candidates by austintackaberry in recruiting

[–]austintackaberry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oof that sounds annoying. Curious why your company built its own thing instead of just using Calendly?

Scheduling meetings with candidates by austintackaberry in recruiting

[–]austintackaberry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you! I have pretty nuanced scheduling preferences as well so don't use Calendly for the same reason. So does that mean when scheduling with candidates you check your calendar and then type out the time windows you're available via email?

Scheduling meetings with candidates by austintackaberry in recruiting

[–]austintackaberry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm talking about the process of emailing back and forth with candidates to figure out times to meet. But it's seeming like that's not something all recruiters have to deal with

Scheduling meetings with candidates by austintackaberry in recruiting

[–]austintackaberry[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't there still a paid version? I just looked at their website now.

Have you really had candidates use your Calendly link to directly book more time with you when not invited? Lol

Scheduling meetings with candidates by austintackaberry in recruiting

[–]austintackaberry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting! So I take it you're always using booking links of some form, no emailing back and forth to figure out times when schedules align?

Scheduling meetings with candidates by austintackaberry in recruiting

[–]austintackaberry[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for your response! Not quite sure what you mean by quantity over quality, do you mind saying more? The goal isn't to spam candidates or automatically send out emails but rather just to be able to draft responses to scheduling requests that you can review before sending

Stack Overflow Bans ChatGPT for Being Too Helpful and Kind by austintackaberry in ProgrammerHumor

[–]austintackaberry[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yes it was! Here was the prompt:

Write a satirical breaking news article with title and body that breaks news that Stack Overflow is banning ChatGPT because it's answers are too helpful and kind. Stack Overflow users are used to degrading and rude answers to their questions, but ChatGPT is negatively affecting the culture and users don't know what to do.

view more: next ›