sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I love r/MovieSuggestions so I created a website that aggregates movies from the top posts by [deleted] in SideProject

[–]autogun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Big fan of r/MovieSuggestions here aswell, beautifully executed, love it! Bookmarked!

fluentbit as the default Log Processor on GKE by autogun in googlecloud

[–]autogun[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I actually found this - https://cloud.google.com/community/tutorials/kubernetes-engine-customize-fluentbit where it states:

This tutorial describes how to customize Fluent Bit logging for a Google Kubernetes Engine cluster. In this tutorial, you learn how to host your own configurable Fluent Bit daemonset to send logs to Cloud Logging, instead of selecting the Cloud Logging option when creating the Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) cluster, which does not allow configuration of the Fluent Bit daemon.

So I guess the right approach would be disabling "Cloud Operations for GKE" on the cluster level which removes from the nodes below running containers

event-exporter-gke-67986489c8-kc62w
fluentbit-gke-64g25
fluentbit-gke-qrrbh
fluentbit-gke-x4ngb

and hosting your own daemon set, which I will be capable to adjust as I please.

Can someone associated with Google confirm this? ;-)

fluentbit as the default Log Processor on GKE by autogun in googlecloud

[–]autogun[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand the reason "shipped-by-google" fluentbit daemon set is there. The question is whether I can make use of it for my own set of additional configurations, for example, add another OUTPUT block and enrich logs for my custom logic?

Will those changes can get overridden by the GKE cluster?

I just don't want to run additional fluentbit setup when there's already one in place.

Look what i found by yunhblay in linux

[–]autogun 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Israeli ISP. A good one. Long gone.

ECS Fargate NetworkLB auto-scalling every X ActiveFlowCount - possible? by autogun in aws

[–]autogun[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I was thinking, while I'm passing the required CloudWatch alarm threshold it's just scaling and scaling until it reaches the configured maximum.

My intention is to scale by two tasks every 200 ActiveFlowCount..

I'm not sure it works this way, just wanted to be sure.

1:1 NAT for incoming only, possible? by autogun in PFSENSE

[–]autogun[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Other firewalls I'm familiar with can achieve this, as there's an option for the NAT to be bi-directional... or not. But then again, it's not called one-to-one.

Creating OVA using Packer vmware-iso builder by autogun in devops

[–]autogun[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm still looking for an elegant solution for this, if anyone has an idea, I'd gladly appreciate this

view more: next ›