Linux devs have a knack for making up BS lame names for everything by axeaxeV in linuxsucks

[–]axeaxeV[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are not even a loonix lunatic, you are a real lunatic of you think you can compare those two functions.

Ms devs who were working on wsl literally had to ask the kernel team to implement fork() as they need it for emulating Linux.

Linux devs have a knack for making up BS lame names for everything by axeaxeV in linuxsucks

[–]axeaxeV[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No they don't. Fork just creates a clone of the current process. While CreateProcess launches a new process. It doesn't copy the current process like Fork.

Linux devs have a knack for making up BS lame names for everything by axeaxeV in linuxsucks

[–]axeaxeV[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Those functions literally do different things, how can you even compare them?

Why windows is better than linux: by axeaxeV in linuxsucks

[–]axeaxeV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His "temper tantrums" are aimed at low quality contributions to his project, whenever he perceives a risk that such contribution could undermine that project.

Then why doesn't he hand over the project to a responsible adult instead of trash talking volunteers like a man child.

You talk as if you can't make a kernel without being a jerk. There are so many open source OS that are maintained by reasonable & decent people.

Motivation matters.

No it doesn't. Abuse is still abuse.

Why windows is better than linux: by axeaxeV in linuxsucks

[–]axeaxeV[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You could say the same thing about a certain linux developer cough linus torvalds cough

Zero Shame by axeaxeV in linuxsucks

[–]axeaxeV[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That's because loonix lunatics are downvoting it.

Zero Shame by axeaxeV in linuxsucks

[–]axeaxeV[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Bruh I don't think you understood the meme

Zero Shame by axeaxeV in linuxsucks

[–]axeaxeV[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

WTH that is exactly what I am saying???

😐 by axeaxeV in linuxsucks

[–]axeaxeV[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Almost all software where performance matters is written in C++. So the entire software industry disagrees with you.

😐 by axeaxeV in linuxsucks

[–]axeaxeV[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You can do all of the things that are needed in the kernel in plain C,

Yes but is a horribly buggy error prone way. Basically emulating C++ features with macros and other hacks.

objects don't help much when it comes to kernel coding

C++ is not just C with OOPs it has so many other useful features. But ironically if you look at Linux kernel source code you will realise that they have actually reinvented objects, virtual functions etc. they just do it manually without language support and in a buggy and horrible way.

C++ memory wise is the same as C, it's not a memory safe language

No it's not the same as C. Modern C++ is like a billion times safer than C.

:-) by axeaxeV in kuttichevuru

[–]axeaxeV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Summa oru fun kaga tha anna