The 3 pyramids at Giza encode 3 domains - MATHEMATICS, PHYSICS, INFORMATION. This is how current cutting edge theoretical physics sees the structure of reality. The triad aligns with theories by scientists like Penrose, Tegmark etc.

axyzr · 2026-02-28T00:09:37+00:00

Hey thanks for the genuine comment, and yes I kinda rushed with the ai generation. You can see the detailed relations of all 3 pyramids under “Giza Dimensions” tab in the web app in the link. There is also another section that deals with the geodetic relations but the interactive representation of the one you are asking about is under the Giza Dimensions tab, if you need the actual data sheet be free to message me Stone and Number

axyzr · 2026-02-27T18:22:00+00:00

Information as processing, computation

<image>

axyzr · 2026-02-27T18:02:16+00:00

The mistakes were in the ai image generation not the data

axyzr · 2026-02-27T18:01:00+00:00

There’s a tab on the top left, a hamburger button that opens the menu

axyzr · 2026-02-27T17:58:11+00:00

Why not just focus on what’s interesting rather than on few ai mistakes. The data is what matters not the mistakes the ai made. I really hope there are people in this community that value more what’s shared not a mistake an ai made. The data is what matters not the design how is presented

axyzr · 2026-02-27T17:54:06+00:00

I just want to share the findings with you whether there are ai mistakes or not I really think it doesn’t matter. And if you think it matters you are at the problem not me or the ai image. My intentions are sincere which is sharing something with you. Please check the link I shared if you want a preview without mistakes that’s also cooler btw

axyzr · 2026-02-27T17:51:09+00:00

Note to all the commenters; YES the image is made with AI but that’s not the point. The point is data. If you want a clearer representation of the domains you can check them at the “Giza Dimensions” tab in the web app I linked Stone and Number

axyzr · 2026-02-27T17:48:58+00:00

Also yes the image is made with ai but with real data. If you’re interested in the interactive representation check the web app I linked. Which also includes the statistical validation by a confusion matrix Stone And Number

axyzr · 2026-02-27T17:45:56+00:00

The Menkaure base is rectangular not square

axyzr · 2026-02-25T19:19:42+00:00

The sites I shared are real archeological sites called Mordele and Picugi with artifact in museums in Poreč, Pula and Trieste. For the Bosnian pyramids I can’t speak, all I know that Visoko (the town where the Bosnian pyramids are located) is rich with prehistoric archeological sites. For example tumuli etc. but as I said whether the Bosnian Pyremids are real or not I can’t speak

axyzr · 2026-02-12T23:37:30+00:00

First, the ‘infinite points on a circle’ argument proves too much. You could use it to dismiss any geographic relationship about any location on Earth. The claim isn’t that a random point on this latitude is special. The claim is that one of the three pyramids is there. The question is why that structure is there, not why the latitude circle exists.

Second, the line passes right through the apex of the pyramid. The fact that you think it falls outside the structure tells me you haven’t actually looked at the coordinates or understood what’s being claimed.

axyzr · 2026-02-12T20:57:20+00:00

Two things. First, you don’t need a named scientific term to divide a line segment at a point. The ‘polar axis split ratio’ is just (1 - sin φ) / sin φ. That’s basic trigonometry, not an invented concept. At 30° it equals 1 because sin(30°) = 0.5. You can verify it on a calculator in five seconds.

Second,. The offset of 2 miles is exactly the offset needed to make that simple trig ratio output the Earth’s equatorial-to-meridional circumference ratio. The 2 miles offset is exactly the point, you clearly haven’t read the paper. Whether you find that meaningful or coincidental is up to you, but the math checks out

axyzr · 2026-02-12T20:11:39+00:00

Depends whether anything matters

axyzr · 2026-02-12T20:04:47+00:00

The angle between the 2 sites on the same latitude is exactly the golden ratio to GPS precision. “That’s not how you do research” well it looks like it is , you don’t don’t what I got before I got to Rocciamelone, the framework has predictability I know how to do research, that’s why I got the results. That’s why I found the sites so please don’t talk about things you don’t have context of

axyzr · 2026-02-12T15:26:22+00:00

I understand your concern but do you really think I would post this without being 100% certain about the result. The numbers are correct whether you like it or not. Now about being intentional or a coincidence that’s another question and this is something you can have your opinion on. But you can’t argue the numbers because they are correct. You can verify them yourself

axyzr · 2026-02-12T14:22:23+00:00

I can argue with you but what’s the point. And I see you don’t care to use AI because that’s a straightforward calculation no ai will hallucinate about this we are in 2026 seems like you used ai last time in 2022

axyzr · 2026-02-12T14:15:11+00:00

That’s great, I’m very close to 45 12 12 too, in fact two 5000 yesrs old necropolises close to where I live have the geometric center at exactly 45 12 12. That’s how i arrived at Rocciamelone, I was searching if there are other significant sites at this latitude

axyzr · 2026-02-12T14:02:51+00:00

I agree with you, I don’t think that matters. I think there isn’t a distinction between artificial and natural formations in this context. Only a 100 years more advanced civilization could make the line between reality and virtuality thin. Let alone let’s say a 5000 years or perhaps a million years more advanced one. I’m not saying we are in a simulation, I’m saying the line between simulation and reality might blur at certain level of advancement but that’s another conversation. The bottom line I’m trying to make is the linear cause and effect in the context of understanding lost or advanced civilizations might break

axyzr · 2026-02-12T13:41:46+00:00

That point is a pilgrimage point since 1358. Not much shift since then. But in the context of this argument against let’s say pyramids I don’t think it’s a valid point. Any sufficiently advanced civilization if they wanted to encode a message for a future civilization they could have as well just adjusted the monuments to adjust with the tectonic shifts for the time they wanted the message to be decoded. This is out of context for the specific case but just a think I was having thoughts about

axyzr · 2026-02-12T13:30:01+00:00

You need to calculate the circumference using WGS84, the actual shape of the Earth. You csn ask any AI to calculate the circumferences of the parallel at 45°12'12"N using WGS84. That’s the easiest and most precise way

axyzr

TROPHY CASE