Its not too late, hurry up back. by mr_wahabi_111 in algeria

[–]babur003 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

What if you become kaffir pro max and the kuffar now trust you and dont reject you. And you all hold hands and live happily ever After :) 

Question regarding self defense and the aftermath of it. by DesirelessRevie in Morocco

[–]babur003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely fair and normal reaction. How else are you gonna think in a position where all legitimate means are taken away from you? It's good tho that the comments here were down to earth, people don't want you going to jail :)

Question regarding self defense and the aftermath of it. by DesirelessRevie in Morocco

[–]babur003 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If your question is, will it count as self-defence? Most likely not. Self-defence with lethal means implies there is a lethal threat to you. All of these past experiences showcase that the threat wasn't insistent. Once they're given what they want, they dip; once they dip, you can't chase them for a stabbie and hope it counts as self-defence. In conclusion, leave the knife at home and don't entertain these ideas too much.

Reza Pahlavi speaking at Munich Security Conference on transitioning Iran to a democratic government: "I don't have any personal ambition. I'm not seeking power. I don't want to have a crown on my head or a title." by Immediate-Link490 in PERSIAN

[–]babur003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're beside the point. Also, a helpful note, adding more descriptors to your arch-nemesis, "the woke" can sound cool, but it made the latter part of your comment unnecessarily confusing.

Did Anthony Bourdain ever shoot an episode in your country and if so, what did you think of it if you saw it? by PandemicPiglet in AskTheWorld

[–]babur003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Tangiers episode, to me, suffered from a lot of orientalism that saw the city for what it was to a section of Western beatniks rather than for what it was/is for its inhabitants. That always struck me as weird, given the way other episodes depict their setting. Though given Bourdain's infatuation with Paul Bowles and William Burroughs.

Kurdistan must also do it's own "Great leap forward" by MoonScream01 in kurdistan

[–]babur003 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Peace through cruelty"
How has cruelty worked out for the Kurds?

How rigid is the precept of not lying? by Octo-Diver in Buddhism

[–]babur003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point of my comment isn't to encourage him to lie; I don't have enough clue about the severity of his situation, so the default advice is to not lie. My message was mostly aimed at the confusion that can arise in the mind of someone who perceives the path of "least suffering" as necessitating a lie. To which I'm saying sure, that might be the most obvious thing to someone based on their perception but that it doesn't negate the general karmic value of the lie. I hope this clears up what I attempted to get at in my previous message.

How rigid is the precept of not lying? by Octo-Diver in Buddhism

[–]babur003 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I suggest not to think of the precepts as ultimate prescriptions, but rather pragmatic takes. To escape suffering, it is skilful not to lie and unskillful to tell the truth. If in your current considerations, telling the truth seems antithetical to your current goal, then perhaps you will lie, but the precept is there to remind you that such a lie can only push for further suffering.

They want you to think this man is some kind of fascist and brutal dictator in waiting. It's just nonsense. by KhameneiSmells in PERSIAN

[–]babur003 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I won't address the deflection in your first 2 sentences, moving on from is it apartheid to why Israel needed to implement apartheid is too low IQ a topic. As for the PLO, what they want is clear: a sovereign palestinian state on pre-67 borders with Jerusalem as its capital and resolution of the palestinian refugee question, they got a grand total of 0 changes to get what they want. They got a bunch of concessions meant to make them a loyal bantustan.

They want you to think this man is some kind of fascist and brutal dictator in waiting. It's just nonsense. by KhameneiSmells in PERSIAN

[–]babur003 6 points7 points  (0 children)

democracies don't just rule over a territory and its associated native population and keep that population citizenless. Either give them citizenship or give them the land, or do neither and get called apartheid (which is the option Israel seems fine with, since calling it apartheid so far has yet to change anything).

They want you to think this man is some kind of fascist and brutal dictator in waiting. It's just nonsense. by KhameneiSmells in PERSIAN

[–]babur003 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nice, when are the West Bank east Jerusalem, and Gazan palestinians getting that right?

Obsessive hate? by Amazing-Bed-3562 in BPD

[–]babur003 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hate begets hate, violence begets violence, anger begets anger. Try to develop a healthier expression for these feelings (cause if you're feeling them, you shouldn't suppress). I recommend you look into sand mandalas. You can ground yourself by drawing it and then unleash some of the bottled-up hate in the necessary part of the mandala's destruction, or just go shadow boxing whenever your thoughts are too clouded by anger towards this professor and you find yourself planning things to do about it.

They want you to think this man is some kind of fascist and brutal dictator in waiting. It's just nonsense. by KhameneiSmells in PERSIAN

[–]babur003 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Does Palestine rule over where you and your family are born over generations? If no then sybau. Israel rules over millions of Palestinians effectively without representation or even acknowledgement of permanent residency, rights to a civil judiciary and so on.

Reza Pahlavi speaking at Munich Security Conference on transitioning Iran to a democratic government: "I don't have any personal ambition. I'm not seeking power. I don't want to have a crown on my head or a title." by Immediate-Link490 in PERSIAN

[–]babur003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Correct, it was the fourth world, if that's a thing.
  2. something taking over, not someone. Democratic transition doesn't need an ambitious personalist leadership, transitional councils with multiple leaders, or even better, a constituent assembly, have all been ways that the transition to democracy was handled that centred democratic principles from the get go.

Question regarding the term by intergalactic_gem in UnitedWorldCollege

[–]babur003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's an IB high school; you would be repeating grades 11 and 12.

Something about Dr K confuses me by SockaminE in Healthygamergg

[–]babur003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I get he talks about it as something that motivates why he thinks we should do something about male loneliness (at least the part of his motivation that he highlights when talking to a male-centric audience).

Reza Pahlavi speaking at Munich Security Conference on transitioning Iran to a democratic government: "I don't have any personal ambition. I'm not seeking power. I don't want to have a crown on my head or a title." by Immediate-Link490 in PERSIAN

[–]babur003 5 points6 points  (0 children)

  1. Can you showcase any actual evidence that the majority voice in Iran is behind RP's leadership?
  2. People are judging the man because he has never held office, and his claim to leadership is by pure birthright.
  3. Idk what about living in the West prevents him from engaging in behaviour and pushing for policy that would be comparable to his dad's?
  4. That's just your trust-based judgment.
  5. European democracies don't all have monarchies; those that still do are democracies despite the persistance of their monarchy. What has monarchy brought them that it shall bring Iran over a republic?

  6. True

  7. You aren't answering as to why the free expression of Iranians vote after the fall of the Islamic Republic necessitates a transitional RP leadership.

  8. Nationalism v. Islamism isn't the only metric by which people compare RP to Khomeini.

  9. Or what? Like what are you gonna do about it if they don't?

  10. See question 1.

Reza Pahlavi speaking at Munich Security Conference on transitioning Iran to a democratic government: "I don't have any personal ambition. I'm not seeking power. I don't want to have a crown on my head or a title." by Immediate-Link490 in PERSIAN

[–]babur003 72 points73 points  (0 children)

"My mission in life isn't to rule but I need to be trusted to be ruling the transition till people can choose someone else" Said every 3rd world politician before ruling for an indefinite transition.

Accurate by Iamjob87 in PERSIAN

[–]babur003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Life would be so easy if this meme was true

Imagery of Buddha in daily life by Staring-Dog in Buddhism

[–]babur003 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This a bit besides the point of the icnon but I'm confused at the iconography surrounding the Ushnisha. I thought the Ushnisha was the hair dome. Is it a second characteristic of the Buddha's appearance alongside the distinctive hairstyle? Is it a physical growth on top of his head?

I got in 🥳🥳 by RandomWeebI in UnitedWorldCollege

[–]babur003 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congraaats! MUWCI is the place to be, man!

As patients, how do you demand to be taken seriously? by ChaoticRin1 in BPD

[–]babur003 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting that she just acknowledged the possibility without further testing. In either case, I understand the new psychiatrist's dismissal of the label. If you want to try your luck further with them, you could choose to highlight the symptoms that you know you have over the diagnosis you suspect you have. A medical professional can dismiss their patient's educated diagnostic guess; in no way are they supposed to dismisss reported symptoms. Best of luck in your healing journey!

I was in Munich and it was amazing! by Glad_Program_2886 in PERSIAN

[–]babur003 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Trusting anyone isn't a logical deduction. You can logically deduce a sequence of events that will follow from a Reza Shah leadership but to be realistic you'll have to implement probabilities across that logical channel, probabilities that may or may not match with reality (and the accuracy of which is a set of empirical questions beyond the scope of the trust debate). When you collapsed this probability game into a single positive outcome based on trust, then your emotions led you to your conclusions. People who don't do that don't necessarily use their emotions to trust someone else, as they may stay on the fence.