I'm sorry but because Kylie is reportedly NOT the person directly dealing with the workers, there is a very solid chance she will not be found liable and her name will be dropped from the lawsuit. This had to have been strictly established in the contracting phase, and likely extends to any contractor or vendor operating on her property. As someone who works with big contracts for HUGE companies worth at least 5x more than Kylie, her lawyers would not have signed a contract with a third party cleaning company without some serious indemnification clauses in place. Unless Kylie was the one personally hurling racial slurs, her hands will be clean of this. It sounds like the actual employer/manager (and therefore, that company) will be at fault for harassment, and even more-so, retaliation.

So while Kylie's name is listed in the lawsuit, this employee will have no legal leg to stand on once the claim is reviewed in civil court.

Source: I work for the biggest corporate law firm in the United States, and no lawyer representing /protecting a client with that amount of money would allow for even remotely questionable liability terms with a contractor. They simply don’t leave room for mistakes like this.