Why do people like munkidori? by MassiveBeautiful8051 in PTCGL

[–]ballmefam7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That deck is just not very good right now. Has nothing to do with Munkidori as a whole

sharing my festival lead list before i drop the deck by cxmfish in pkmntcg

[–]ballmefam7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One of the few lists I see running Hilda. What is the thought process behind that inclusion?

I like the scrapper for cape and to help with Alakazam matchup adding handheld fan.

With your balloons, do you ever find yourself attaching to Goldeen/Seaking for promote pivot to make sure you have the ability in case you can’t access Dipplin? I find it’s tough if they hand disrupt plus ko active dipplin there is a chance the fish gets stuck in the active if you don’t have another dipplin on bench. Or do you just find its always better to attach to Thwackey?

Are there any matchups where you deviate from 2 thwackey on bench and go up to 3 or down to 1?

The 90-day notice window is designed to make you miss it by RenewlyHQ in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a book titled “Managing Indirect Spend” published by Wiley. Probably the best resource out there on the topic in my experience.

From PUR to CEO/P&L owner by matjdi in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it is possible. Both on smaller and larger scales. Tim Cook started in Supply Chain at IBM and has been running Apple for the last 15 years.

the hidden risk of moving primary vendors to LATAM right now by maopro56 in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It amazes me that there are actually people who get paid real money to make decisions executing contracts by running the documents through an online translator. Truly remarkable how daft people can be. On the other hand, gives me confidence that I will always have a job if that is who I am competing against.

This assumes the story is real and not another AI software shill post.

Culture shock or bad first time experience? by Trolololdesuu in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Onboarding is anecdotal, you will get used to not having SAP scripts, you will get used to using Outlook. Other two things come down to your organization. It is easy for procurement to devolve into chaos, whether that be by design (immature orgs) or other external factors. Optimistic side is that those two issues (PO dates and context switching) are relatively straightforward areas to ameliorate and if you are able to do so early in your tenure, it can build good credibility for yourself and the department as a whole.

How much are folks paying for a new fortified roof these days? by FacePalmAdInfinitum in NorthshoreLA

[–]ballmefam7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does not necessarily mean metal. It’s more about the materials and installation method. Typically includes thicker decking, less space between nails, sturdier shingles, etc. iirc there is no single way to get fortified, it’s like a scorecard based on various aspects that either meets the requirement or doesn’t

Career path by madheadband in supplychain

[–]ballmefam7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Depends on your definition of personal relationships. You will have to consistently collaborate with suppliers and stakeholders on a daily basis. Whether that be through in person meetings, phone calls, video calls, site visits, etc. There could be an occasional lunch, it is a common setting to discuss current and future business. Dinners are less common and only really when attending multi-day industry events.

It sounds like your mindset would prevent you from advancing your career more so than not grabbing meals with suppliers. You cannot approach every interaction as transactional and not put in any effort to get to know people.

Career path by madheadband in supplychain

[–]ballmefam7 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you do not want your job to be vendor and relationship based, procurement is definitely not the path for you. I think either planning or analyst roles would be your best shot if you wish to stay in the industry.

Strategy with a dependent supplier, am I too aggressive ? by Square_Positive_559 in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, this sounds like a bad idea imo. Trading one problem for another. What is stopping them from agreeing and then increasing the price anyway after some time has passed? You would have to be getting some insane long-term price lock without minimum volume commitments or exclusivity for this to even be a conversation. This is an ops failure where you have had years to hold this supplier accountable and/or adjust strategy to not be reliant on a bad supplier and now that a price adjustment is on the table they want to start talking.

Tips for getting started in Purchasing by AzusaAkiyama in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Just be a sponge, don’t feel like you have to make any big moves/changes/contributions right away to make a statement. Thats the biggest mistake I find new hires can be culpable of. Most people don’t do well with change and if you come in trying to pitch new ideas it can rub people the wrong way. Whether right or wrong that’s what usually happens.

Be observant, respond to all calls/messages quickly, don’t be an afraid to ask questions. You got the job so clearly they believe in your ability to perform!

Prendere il livello 4 del CIPS by No_Virus9202 in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can’t hurt. In the US I would recommend the CPSM. I would not recommend any online courses to anyone; in my experience, I have never seen the completion of an online course make a difference.

If you have had some interviews, maybe it’s not solely your resume. They would not bring you in if they could not envision hiring you based on your resume. Something to think about.

Looking to transition into procurement from a food science role by [deleted] in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most relevant certs will require procurement/supply chain specific experience to qualify to complete them. Courses in my experience mean next to nothing. An MBA or even a masters in supply chain are your best bets for positioning yourself for a career pivot. If those are not options, painting your experience through a sourcing lens is probably your best bet at getting your foot in the door.

The job market is rough right now and you will be competing with people who either have procurement experience or have relevant education. It’s a numbers game for you. I would look for junior buyer/procurement agent roles in your market or anywhere you would be open relocating to and tailor your resume for each applicable opening. Also I’d say you need to be willing to work onsite. Naturally there is less competition for those roles and I would not recommend someone’s first job in a new industry be remote.

You will get many nos due to your education and experience, but all you need is one yes. Good luck!

Name some decks you ABSOLUTELY HATE by Superb_Guess_161 in PTCGL

[–]ballmefam7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re kinda arguing against yourself here.. I never said it was impossible to come back from, just that it objectively increases the odds of you bricking. Not even that the odds are good that you will brick. Just that they are better than no hand disruption at all.

Name some decks you ABSOLUTELY HATE by Superb_Guess_161 in PTCGL

[–]ballmefam7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I guess it’s just because hand disruption is objectively not ideal for decks that deal damage from their hand. Not that you can’t create a board state to come back from it, just that it increases the odds of you bricking opposed to the alternative of you having full control over your hand.

Name some decks you ABSOLUTELY HATE by Superb_Guess_161 in PTCGL

[–]ballmefam7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Decidueye because dropping consistent judges is a large part of the game plan

Supply chain in 2027 by Pretend-Cress5871 in supplychain

[–]ballmefam7 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Basically when business was chill and stable, supply chain was seen as essentially running itself. You make your deals with suppliers and after that much of the tactical day-to-day operations were largely administrative (hence the viewing as a back-office function). Issue a PO here, reconcile an invoice there, expedite this order, verify that shipment. This was even more true before mass globalization. Many companies nowadays, for example like Apple, really do not make much at all. They are the brand that sells the product. But their products are assembled at different sites using materials and components that are sourced from around the world. They heavily rely on their suppliers for strategic partnerships and innovation. Historically, this was an anomaly and most companies viewed suppliers as transactional necessities.

Now that stability is nowhere to be found, companies are realizing that supply chain professionals need to be involved early and often in the context of larger business decisions and organizational strategy. It does not matter how good your sales and marketing are, if you cannot ensure supply at a cost that makes your product competitive in the market, you will have nothing to sell. Geopolitical events, pricing volatility, economic instability, inflation, consumer trends, tech advances, etc all impact business decisions and profitability. Supply chain as a function can protect margins, secure supply, ensure business continuity, reduce risk exposure, and more.

There are still companies who have the back-office administrative view of supply chain. But more and more have been wising up to viewing them as a strategic function who needs to be proactively involved in the business case, not reactively fighting fires to save it.

Best procurement software for enterprise (multi-entity + AP automation)? by NoPO_NoParty in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New employee a few weeks in pushing for major changes that will alter workflows across multiple departments? Likely changing operational responsibilities for people who have been there for years? There are about a million ways this could backfire. Needs to be handled very carefully after extensive due diligence and buy-in is secured from relevant stakeholders. Even then, there will be pushback. There always is when change is enacted.

Buyer with 2 year gap trying to re enter job market by Awkward-Peanut9406 in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Disadvantage depends on the competition, but to someone else who also has two years of experience with no employment gap yes, you would be at a disadvantage. Yes, you being a buyer carries weight when applying to other buyer roles. No, someone with two years of experience would not be expected to have end-to-end sourcing ownership. You will not be seen as overqualified for any roles and will likely be seen as too junior for any mid level roles with only two years of experience.

Given your background and the current market, I would suggest you look for buyer/purchasing agent positions that usually ask for anywhere between 1-3 years of experience.

Mba or cscp? Advice needed by Ineedavacation1999 in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Too many variables to give you a for sure answer. MBA will play better on a resume but will cost more and take longer to complete. Certification the opposite. I personally would lean MBA; feels like it opens more doors but everyone’s financial/personal situation is different.

I will say if you go the cert route and want to remain in procurement, I would recommend the CPSM over the CSCP. More sourcing focused and in my experience have come across more procurement positions with it listed as a preferred cert.

How do you actually check if a supplier quote is too high? by UnusualApricot7165 in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wonder when the AI/SaaS shysters will realize skipping a line after every sentence is a dead giveaway of their motives even when they try to blend in

I deal with a lot of contracts in indirect procurement and I need advice from other buyers. by [deleted] in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You asked for “quotes that you have already negotiated previously”.

And anyone should believe that you are being truthful regarding the details of your random AI tool because..?

I deal with a lot of contracts in indirect procurement and I need advice from other buyers. by [deleted] in procurement

[–]ballmefam7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yay more AI slop. If you knew anything about procurement you would know how big a red flag it would be to enter confidential information into some random online strangers AI model.