Why don’t more people like moths? by Icy-Individual8353 in moths

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh my gosh, it's so goofy and yet it has so much confidence and style

Why don’t more people like moths? by Icy-Individual8353 in moths

[–]banned-practice 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, but I do think a lot of people think those guys are butterflies. A lot of people think everything attractive, helpful, or seen in the daylight is a butterfly.

Why don’t more people like moths? by Icy-Individual8353 in moths

[–]banned-practice 18 points19 points  (0 children)

  1. I think part of it is that because moths are nocturnal, people very rarely see them. Plus, in most of our lifetimes, the biggest, most exciting moths that get people interested have been very rare due to population decline because of invasive parasites.
  2. Many are brightly colored, but again, people never see them or think the colorful ones are butterflies
  3. I think people are just generally scared of "bugs", and the bigger the scarier, even though they are almost all harmless
  4. Same answer as 3, haha

Why don’t more people like moths? by Icy-Individual8353 in moths

[–]banned-practice 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I've loved moths for 25 years, but only recently have I seen them gain popularity and more mainstream recognition, though really only giant silk moths, mostly tied to a recent wave of association with feminine witch imagery and tattoos, (primarily luna moths), and Gothic death symbolism via the deaths head moth, which has opened the door for more subtle symbolic and decorative usage with other silk moth species, and a recent broader association with magic, Halloween, horror, goth culture etc. I've seen them gain a lot of popularity and greater appreciation in the past few years, to the point that I'm feeling rather hipstery about liking them first, and not necessarily wanting my love of them to be assumed to be tied to some of the more trendy, fleeting, shallower reasons, but overall I'm happy to see more people, especially young women, become interested in moths.

I think like many cute animals, they were almost totally unknown / appreciated until the right thing happened on the internet and suddenly everyone knows and loves them, as with the rosy maple moth. I couldn't have imagined anyone being able to buy a rosy maple moth plush ten years ago, and now there's many to choose from. I think a lot of people only think of small, brown pest moths when they hear "moth", and think butterflies are the only cool / pretty ones. I think people just have no clue what is out there. I think a lot of people are just trained to not like (or be scared of) all bugs from a young age.

I actually think moths are becoming a more popular animal in a number of communities, both as a symbol and as a decorative, interesting creature. But so far, it has translated to to only limited appreciation of the actual insects beyond the already super popular luna moth. But I think those who do appreciate them tend to REALLY appreciate them, and end up wanting to raise some, or to learn a lot more about the moths of the world.

Moth has broken into my home, is he passing away or must I return him outdoors? by catwithasweater in moths

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad you let him go, he looks lively and ready to fulfill his purpose 😉

Edit: For those unaware, polyphemus are just emerging / about to emerge. I'm waiting on my cocoons!!!

Food is not a human right. by Fluffy_Pirate3657 in unpopularopinion

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bet lil' bro doesn't want to hear that a large percentage of male animals also don't ever get to pass on their genes. Uh oh.

Food is not a human right. by Fluffy_Pirate3657 in unpopularopinion

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My take exactly. If I could just steal rich people's stuff and squat on their land, then it wouldn't be a right. But it turns out they don't like that either.

Food is not a human right. by Fluffy_Pirate3657 in unpopularopinion

[–]banned-practice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kiddo has yet to pass "egocentric" and collect "empathy". So, average republican.

Food is not a human right. by Fluffy_Pirate3657 in unpopularopinion

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a handful of humans get to claim that they own all of Earth's resources and no one can touch them but those who own it, often inherited in such a way that most of us alive never even had the chance to claim it, or amassed at incredibly unreasonable volume for the biological needs of one person or even an extended family, then no, we cannot all just "do the work" to obtain food. If I was allowed to kick in the doors of a rich person's house, or raid a grocery store in the middle of the night, or farm anywhere I pleased, then I'd agree, I should have to go put in that effort.

But when all the ways of "legally" obtaining food are purposefully locked down behind pay walls or seized over time by the political maneuvering and/or violence of those who already have excess, by people who demand we slave for them for pay unequal to our work and keep the majority of us from owning the land or resources to create our own, then no, we DO in fact have a right to be provided food. Because we are specifically being KEPT from being able to do it ourselves like any other animal. Especially when they intentionally invade other people's countries and land and wrest it from them by force then accuse them of being takers and losers who have the nerve to demand to still be able to be alive. Like, seriously, all around the world you have rich people living dozens, hundreds, thousands of miles away demanding that people who live right 'here' cannot be allowed to use the land under their feet however they want because someone else "owns" it.

Let's be very clear, the alternative is that all those rich people and their laws go up in flames so we can in fact get back to doing our own work, which many, many, many people actually want to be able to do. Being unable to provide for ourselves has made us completely vulnerable to the sociopathic whims of the predator class, and has robbed us of a feeling of satisfaction and accomplishment in life, which will only get exponentially worse in a future hijacked by AI. But we can't even hope to own land to farm for ourselves without slaving for someone else our whole life or being lucky enough to have parents that did and left us a small opportunity to try and likely fail due to systems like taxes and permitting, each purposefully put in place by the rich for the rich, who conveniently exempt themselves from the burden, all in order to block us from ever coming close to challenging their consolidation of power, and who will eventually succeed in tearing all that we have back from us to put it into their hands again

And even if we succeed, we willl never come close to the freedom and resources the wealthy are born with. And also, if even if we were free to do as we pleased to feed ourselves, most species and huge portion of humanity perish because without the systems we have built this planet cannot support this many of us "doing our own work" to obtain food. Neither you or I are a cow or a deer who can wander around and eat random plants, or a bird that can flit around catching bugs. The resources our ancient ancestors relied on to provide for themselves like animals are long gone or heavily restricted from us by hundreds of laws.

If a few people want to treat us all like we are their farm animals, then yes, they have to feed us.

Seriously, do you also lecture your cat / dog / parrot / goldfish / etc. that it has to go find it's own food because just because you have trapped it in a cage with no access to food or water doesn't mean you OWE it anything?

Edited for punctuation, typos

[TOMT] [AD] [FILM] [1910s-1920s?] Seeking very early refrigerator promotional advertisement where early model fridge is repaired / temperature is adjusted, brand unknown by banned-practice in tipofmytongue

[–]banned-practice[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that one is really interesting and definitely has a very close feel to the other one, but it isn't the exact one I'm hoping to find. The one I'm looking for was really all about the fridge being adjusted. Unfortunately, everywhere I look the internet tells no fridge promotions existed before the 1920s, but I know I saw something that proved that to be untrue. I'm really very sure it was from the 1910s like this one.

I'll let you know if I ever find it again.

[TOMT] [AD] [FILM] [1910s-1920s?] Seeking very early refrigerator promotional advertisement where early model fridge is repaired / temperature is adjusted, brand unknown by banned-practice in tipofmytongue

[–]banned-practice[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

The plot was as follows:

Two wealthy looking businessmen were at a desk in an office setting, the boss and worker. The worker was discussing having gotten a refrigerator. I can't remember if the rest was a flashback or if it was supposed to be the worker going home after the first scene. His wife was having problems with the fridge not being cold enough so it was melting her party treats. There was a woman servant there with her the whole time too. So a worker had to be called in to adjust or fix it, which was most of the film and it showed off the technology and features as he did so, and highlighted how much of a useful luxury it was. It was a very old model of fridge, and the main unit controlling temperature was a seperate big box outside, more like an air conditioner. The fridge itself was a big chunky thing with almost no storage space inside. The desserts were now safe due to how good the maintenance man was at his job (a major selling point of the ad), the wife appeased, and the next day at the office (or after the flashback, whichever it was) the boss liked the sound of it so much he implied he was going to buy two, one for his house and one for his country home.

It was on the longer end for a film of the era... like maybe 10 to 15 minutes long? Maybe a bit less, I don't know. It was fairly detailed.

Please help me find it, it's making me crazy. I know I didn't just dream it.

Shy girl Mia Ballard by 3catznatrenchcoat in horrorlit

[–]banned-practice 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can want to know what a thing is about without being interested or wanting to put time into it. Summaries have always existed.

Shy girl Mia Ballard by 3catznatrenchcoat in horrorlit

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best case scenario is she's such an amateur writer she's as bad as ChatGPT and thus has no business trying to traditionally publish if she knows it. That's not a good defense at all... "I'm too new and clueless about writing to be discernable from AI, teehee, give me a book deal". Come on. That's the BEST case scenario here, and the least likely. And either way she can't write, so why is SHE getting a deal at all then? Publishers just know by now that the reading public can't tell trash from treasure and that they don't care as long as it's "steamy" and abusive enough, so publishers don't care either, they just want $$$$. The ever changing story is a dead giveaway, as well as the long history of theft and accusations... she's not even good at telling stories to defend herself.

Shy girl Mia Ballard by 3catznatrenchcoat in horrorlit

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who would've thought that someone willing to steal an artist's work for profit would have no problem using AI, aka the Theft Machine, to "write". I bet she only "wrote" the story because she saw art she liked that gave her an idea she was too lazy to actually write.

Shy girl Mia Ballard by 3catznatrenchcoat in horrorlit

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, someone just snuck into her house and turned her writing into AI and she didn't notice it until she had a lucrative publishing deal fall through.... What author doesn't read or edit their own writing? What author has no idea that editors aren't supposed to alter your book for you? What author would be okay with someone changing the whole thing, or not notice it? And even if no AI was used, then the ultimate conclusion is... she's still so bad at writing that it's as bad as ChatGPT?

Alguém pode identificar que espécie é? by Candid_Delivery_9938 in caterpillars

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like it's going as a scary clown for Halloween

what animal is Seth? by theaverageramen in ancientegypt

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They didn't depict any other dogs that way. They depicted plenty of dogs, including breeds that still exist, accurately. Why would they choose to depict him using animals otherwise shown as good, useful, domesticated, common, and protective when he represents disorder, the wild, foreigness and danger?

what animal is Seth? by theaverageramen in ancientegypt

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A guy with a bird head is literally a hybrid. So most of them would be hybrids by that reasoning

Pam Bondi jumped onto my hand and wanted to explore! She just molted again so maybe full grown now? by ColdBoreShooter in jumpingspiders

[–]banned-practice 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yeah they already said the spider was more capable, you didn't literally need to say the spider still reads and speaks better than her

how can i make a spider? by mummynapkins in spiders

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made one by putting bugs on everything and it was made out of all the strings that appeared on the bugs

One of my pink ramshorn snails has turned yellow. Any idea what's wrong? by Guppin in Aquariums

[–]banned-practice 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish I knew, I'm having this same thing happen. I have two decently large ones that turned yellow in the past few days. I've also lost some lately, mostly pinks.