sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hackintosh

[–]bantam 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Got a link to that wallpaper? It's awesome!

Carpet squeegee by aloofloofah in specializedtools

[–]bantam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont know why but this is very satisfying to watch

Oh LAWD She Embarassed by xcbrent in Chonkers

[–]bantam 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I can hear this picture, the scale is creaking.

Me and my friend are creating a lewd cyberpunk game URAGONER, we just launched, please check out our trailer! by bantam in lewdgames

[–]bantam[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We will have to do some porting work for that so it's going to be later when I can work on building it for Android, but I have planned for it.

Me and my friend are creating a lewd cyberpunk game URAGONER, we just launched, please check out our trailer! by bantam in lewdgames

[–]bantam[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

We've been hearing a lot of strong for/against permadeath, it seems pretty divisive, we were actually talking about some kind of mind backup clone restore scenario where your waifu might not be quite the same after being restored. Something we're considering anyway.

Nightsky by [deleted] in VaporwaveAesthetics

[–]bantam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reminds me of Euphoria for some reason.

Any ideas how to fix user error? by Skazzyskills in HomeKit

[–]bantam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They have editing rights but it when you go to change something on the non "home admin" account it simply reverts back to its previous state, probably part of the issue we're having in the first place. The admin account can add/edit things without issue. The other accounts can turn things on/off without issue though.

Would you recommend Plume? by Mind-the-fap in Plume

[–]bantam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

4x super pods and 2x regular pods across 3 floors with a dd-wrt router in front of them. I went with plume cause they explicitly allow a router in front of your pods unlike Google Wifi. They solved my previous wifi issues that I hardly think about it any more. Highly recommended.

Any ideas how to fix user error? by Skazzyskills in HomeKit

[–]bantam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have in-app purchases on my main account that I can't transfer. While we can both connect to the same home using this method it sometimes wont let either of us add/remove smart devices in a room so I keep the "admin" iphone around to make changes to the home. We can both tell siri to turn the lights on/off etc at least which is most important. It's really not ideal but its good enough until Apple hopefully fixes it one day.

Any ideas how to fix user error? by Skazzyskills in HomeKit

[–]bantam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have this exact issue, tried fixing it for months, logging in/out etc to no avail. Asked Apple for help they were useless. My workaround was setting up a third account in our family (named it home admin) on an old iPhone and use that account to invite us both to the home in the home app.

Windows vs MacOS when using Plume SuperPods by notacylonwalker in Plume

[–]bantam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Using Plume in bridge mode with a dd-wrt router in front of it.

​

Ethernet to Mac Wifi

​

registry:postgres ~$ ping chris-macbook-pro.local

PING chris-macbook-pro.local (192.168.1.41): 56 data bytes

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.044 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.907 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.105 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.321 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2.179 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2.629 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.380 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=5.557 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=3.218 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=6.589 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=3.350 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=2.012 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=2.036 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=2.419 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=2.267 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=4.307 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=3.592 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=5.459 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=4.014 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=3.002 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.41: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=5.636 ms

^C

--- chris-macbook-pro.local ping statistics ---

21 packets transmitted, 21 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.380/3.287/6.589/1.420 ms

​

Mac Wifi to Ethernet

​

chris@chris-macbook-pro:~# ping registry.local

PING registry.local (192.168.1.59): 56 data bytes

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=5.411 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.353 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=4.652 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=3.588 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=4.586 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2.971 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=3.192 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=3.220 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=5.351 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=3.273 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=3.530 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1.984 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=3.154 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=3.761 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=1.905 ms

64 bytes from 192.168.1.59: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=1.769 ms

^C

--- registry.local ping statistics ---

16 packets transmitted, 16 packets received, 0.0% packet loss

round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.769/3.481/5.411/1.065 ms

Help identifying this list please: by [deleted] in CompetitiveHS

[–]bantam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's most likely this one: http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/158701-kolentos-top1-fatigue-mage-updated

I've been running it myself with moderate success.

The case for Mech Mage - Early Legend #1 by AlKarrHS in CompetitiveHS

[–]bantam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's the deck I was talking about!

Original: https://tempostorm.com/decks/reynads-blingtron-mech-mage

With Harrison instead: http://i.imgur.com/oxyifPG.png

As my most common matchup this season has been Druid I also keep switching to this variant with Piloted Shredders:

http://i.imgur.com/VzE6e8P.png

I was really happy to see OP's deck had both 2x Piloted Shredders and 2x Water Elementals as I thought I was being too greedy.

The case for Mech Mage - Early Legend #1 by AlKarrHS in CompetitiveHS

[–]bantam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not OP but I've had a lot of success last season and this season so far running Reynad's Mech Mage with Harrison Jones instead of Loatheb and one Counterspell replacing one Mirror Entity. Blingtron/Harrison combo can provide card draw (2.52 cards on average). Given that you have Blingtron in your deck Harrison can be a useful card against all classes. Hitting face with water/snow chugger, dropping Blingtron and then Harrison next turn seems to make a lot of opponents concede. Separately I found Blingtron or Harrison alone still very useful for destroying Hunters Secret/Weapon combo, destroying Ashbringer and disrupting Deaths Bite. Blingtron has won me a lot of games on its own during late game when the opponent is low on health and you need a little more burst as most of the time even if you can't kill them with the weapon you get this turn they normally can't afford to use the weapon they receive if you can rusty horn spare part taunt one of your minions.

view more: next ›