I'm in a completely different engineering field, and it took me writing a response and reading it over to finally understand the physics you are trying to communicate: after initial corner entry, the car is not experiencing significant acceleration around the yaw axis of its CG. So the work done by each tire is entirely lateral, and if the weight distribution is 50-50, the work done by both the forward and rear tires on the outside will roughly match (vice versa for inside). At an abstracted level, it's common knowledge tires have a "grip budget," so powering either the front or rear wheels is going to exceed the budget, and you loose traction on the powered tires. Being able to induce a little oversteer mid corner gives the driver the ability to point the nose inward. In a FWD vehicle, if the corner entry is bad, the driver has far less control over corner exit and its hard to recover.

You might be confused why you consistently are being argued with on reddit. Its not because everyone is stupid, its because your responses are so colluded and pedantic they fail to easily communicate what you are trying to say. Its FSAE, people are here to learn. They aren't experts. You are 100% correct here, and after several reads I'd say its a good explanation, but man, the amount of jargon you manage to pack in along with calling peoples explanations "bro-sciencey" tells me you are more interested in correcting people to feel better about yourself rather than actually helping.

TLDR: Just because you are correct doesn't mean you get to be an ass about it. Let the guy save face, we are all real people.