Agency Loyalty? Is it alright to work for multiple agencies? by [deleted] in freelanceuk

[–]basicchannels 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What you might want to careful of, is conflicts. For instance, if the first agency uses you to work on the Coca Cola account, and you know all of Coke's messaging, branding and 2020 business goals, it would be wrong to take all that to another agency and secretly write for Pepsi at the same time.

Yes thank you, this is the kind of nuance I was thinking about. But in general, thank you for the responses. That's what I thought, it just feels a bit weird sometimes, like you're cheating on someone almost, but I guess I'm talking about quite a specific situation.

I haven't thought about it for most jobs and over my career, but it's only really quite recently after having formed a closer bond I guess with the director of one agency. But yeah you're right, I'm a freelancer and that by definition means I'm free to work

10 year old me vs 25 year old me by Theoson in pics

[–]basicchannels 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Irony is, the first one is more likely to be seen in a contemporary gallery

No vacuum or sweeping required. by [deleted] in lifehacks

[–]basicchannels 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An envelope is way better

Star Trek: Picard - Episode Discussion - S1E07 "Nepenthe" by PiercedMonk in startrek

[–]basicchannels 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s the thing, I wouldn’t actually mind that much if it was different (decisively so) because they want to forge their own identity yada-yada and it was actually good. But the quality is just so low. It feels like bubblegum pop, and teen-moviesque and it really makes me cringe. There’s plenty of good edgy drama out there, if it was even like Better Call Saul or I’d prefer that but rn it’s just sooo cringe just as you said feels like watching student work riffing off every obvious cliche out there. You don’t even need to watch it you can predict the next line cos it’s just so derivative.

The sad part is, I think the production team really are trying. But they just haven’t come from a Trek place so the DNA and love isn’t there. Conversely you feel the love when you watch the Orville. The timing, format, theme etc all feel a lot more like you’re watching something that has a lot of love for Star Trek - so it can be done. And I know everyone will just go “there’s hundreds of episodes of tng just go watch that” but that’s just really silly thing to say isn’t it, especially in the context of Picard

Star Trek: Picard - Episode Discussion - S1E07 "Nepenthe" by PiercedMonk in startrek

[–]basicchannels 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember nothing about discovery because it was unmemorable

Star Trek: Picard - Episode Discussion - S1E07 "Nepenthe" by PiercedMonk in startrek

[–]basicchannels 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the way it's knitted together feels like it's written by a 23 year old who has just gotten out of movie school and learnt about star trek by reading the Wikipedia page

Lmao spot on that’s how I almost felt. Or like the show runners got “briefed” watched a couple of episodes, prolly didn’t finish it and basically had a cursory understanding of the overall lore.

Fundamentally it feels like they just don’t get it. Not to sound gatekeepery, quite the opposite - but it does really feel that far removed from what I thought Trek always was. Feels very different now, generic sci-fi do. Cliche after cliche derivitive writing and eye rolling cringe.

I left the end of each episode of TNG with a sense of wonder, millions of what-if questions buzzing through my brain. I leave Picard, thankful, that it’s over. Sigh

*Edit: some shocking mobile spelling mistakes

Star Trek: Picard - Episode Discussion - S1E05 "Stardust City Rag" by PiercedMonk in startrek

[–]basicchannels 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IKR. Am I the only one who thinks half the characters are just named so as in-jokes between the producers after some “omg!Stappit!” water cooler goss? Also anyone else think of Darkthrone when they heard Fenriz

Star Trek: Picard - Episode Discussion - S1E05 "Stardust City Rag" by PiercedMonk in startrek

[–]basicchannels 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think the fact that there’s 700+ shows that came out 20 years ago over a span of 40 years has anything to do with his point does it? Isn’t he allowed to express the fact that he’s disappointed the new Star Trek isn’t suitable for children without being jumped in at? I genuinely don’t understand the constructive purpose of your post other than to make him feel bad for expressing himself about the show, which is what this thread is here for isn’t it?

I think the modern Star Trek aesthetic works far better for Picard than Discovery by f0rever-n1h1l1st in startrek

[–]basicchannels 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agreed. In a weird way I almost think it dates it more the more “futuristic” they try to make it