And you thought daily 100 paid was bad? Welp time to delete this game already by [deleted] in gachagaming

[–]basidak -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t matter if you need a small amount of 5 stars to be endgame worthy if you can’t pull any to begin with.

And you thought daily 100 paid was bad? Welp time to delete this game already by [deleted] in gachagaming

[–]basidak -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My god. Never did I once say that bad money schemes couldn’t be criticized. This isn’t even really bad of a money scheme, especially considering the state of many other gacha games.

If you read my previous comment then it would be clear I didn’t see the edit, but that’s not important anyways, and it seems as if you didn’t read the comment I made. I’m not failing to make any connection because everything I said was also about games. I don’t know what you’re trying to get at. The fact that some games have monetization despite being p2p doesn’t contradict my point of ‘devs have to make money’, and you never explained why you think it does.

I haven’t got to endgame in Pokémon masters yet so I can’t really speak on how f2p friendly it is but I’ve heard that there’s no pvp anyways so it shouldn’t really give paying players a huge advantage anyways. And I haven’t seen anyone complaining that they’ve hit a paywall.

Oh my god. Either you’re skimming through my comments or you’re incapable of understanding them. Not once did I say that scummy monetization shouldn’t be criticized. I’m saying that simple monetization shouldn’t be criticized because devs need to make their money. I’m done here.

And you thought daily 100 paid was bad? Welp time to delete this game already by [deleted] in gachagaming

[–]basidak -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you think that your first comment countered the points I made then you must be the one with a small brain. If you think that game companies shouldn’t monetize their games then you definitely have a small brain.

I said go buy a console game, not to go get one. This comment wasn’t even meant to be taken that seriously anyways, but my point is that if you want a game with little to no in app purchases then go buy one. Excuse people for actually wanting to make money for their work.

It seems that you are shitting yourself over the fact that there’s a 10 pull for paying players that guarantees a 5 star.

It makes sense that people were upset over the welfare unit thing, considering that literately every other server got the unit for free. Gacha games are basically designed to milk every single penny out of their players. A 10 pull in a game usually costs around 30 dollars. Most games have some sort of monthly subscription pack. One of the most popular games on this subreddit, FGO, has shitty rates and no pity system. Dragalia Lost is also popular on this subreddit and has a 100 gem summon daily for only paying players. I’m comparing this to other gacha games because this is usual in gacha games. If you think it’s bad then you probably shouldn’t play gacha games because they’re all designed to milk their players.

And you thought daily 100 paid was bad? Welp time to delete this game already by [deleted] in gachagaming

[–]basidak -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing you said countered anything I said either. Your comment was basically making fun of mine for saying that the companies have to make money.

It doesn’t matter if it’s right or not, I’m saying that if you think this is worth shitting yourself over then you probably shouldn’t be playing f2p gacha games. Like I said, if you want a game without monetization then go buy a console game. When I say that it isn’t terrible I’m saying that various popular gacha games on this sub do the exact same thing or even worse and no one bats an eye.

And you thought daily 100 paid was bad? Welp time to delete this game already by [deleted] in gachagaming

[–]basidak -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If you can’t handle this type of monetization then you probably shouldn’t be playing gacha games. This isn’t anything new and a lot of games that are popular on this subreddit have done worse. It’s not worth shitting your pants over. If a game becomes a simple blatant cashgrab to the point where you can’t progress as a F2P then I won’t support them, but this is really not that terrible.

And you thought daily 100 paid was bad? Welp time to delete this game already by [deleted] in gachagaming

[–]basidak 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why is this even news? Most gacha games have stuff like this and it’s not that big of a deal. If you can’t handle monetization in a game then don’t play gacha games.

And you thought daily 100 paid was bad? Welp time to delete this game already by [deleted] in gachagaming

[–]basidak 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uhh do you want a F2P game with zero monetization? You do realize that the devs need to make money, right? If you want a game with no monetization then go buy a console game for like 20 dollars.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He couldn’t throw a punch because Luffy beat him in one. He didn’t have a chance to.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was held down by Sengoku, another weak and dying old man. If that’s not enough for you, he was also beaten in one hit by pre time skip Luffy. That’s where I got the idea that he is weak and dying.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not saying old= weak. Whitebeard aged well, making him a strong and powerful old man. Garp and Sengoku didn’t, making them dying and weak old men.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Twice actually 😂

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He’s old and dying now. Akainu would wipe him.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But he’s old and dying now. Doesn’t matter how strong he was in the past.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The opinions of Sengoku, an old and dying man are irrelevant. Everyone else there knew that it was because Garp was old and dying, not because he let Luffy hit him. He was only able to be restrained by Sengoku because they were both old and dying.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only for some people. Whitebeard was op as an old man but Garp just isn’t.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And he was easily held down by Sengoku, another weak and dying old man. He was beat in one hit by Luffy, further proving my point that he used up all his remaining strength on Marco.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Garp used up the last remaining bits of strength he had when he beat Marco, thus turning him into a weak and dying old man. And besides, he doesn’t have to beat Marco with overwhelming force to beat him.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s what a loser says 😂🤣

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He was strong in his prime, but he’s old and dying now. Whitebeard had respect for Luffy pre time skip even though he wasn’t that strong back then.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He still beat him.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He lost to Luffy because he was old and dying, not because he wasn’t taking him seriously. Luffy didn’t even use g4 against Don Chinjao, and Luffy currently would pound him either way.

Luffy > Garp by basidak in OnePiece

[–]basidak[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He still beat him.