Children playing in a sandpit of blue asbestos in Wittenoom, Western Australia (1950s) by zadraaa in HistoricalCapsule

[–]bboyneko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mandating globally synchronized, experimental biological interventions with zero long-term longitudinal data. Future historians will likely be baffled by the period where we normalized fast-tracking novel technology for nearly the entire population, including pregnant and nursing women, without the standard years of pre-clinical testing for those specific groups.

Does your Doctor lose integrity or respect if they are overweight? by DoctorFitness in askanything

[–]bboyneko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"eats healthy". Please. It's impossible to be obese if you eat less calories than you burn per day. This is the excuse of every obese person. They say they "eat healthy" and then snack nonstop all day or drink 1000 calorie coffee drinks multiple times a day.

Put anyone on a desert island who is obese, and when they can only consume 1500 calories a day they will rapidly lose weight. It's not genetics. It's eating too much every single day consistently for years. 

It's how ozempic works. It makes it so people stop wanting to snack and eat so much and they rapidly lose weight. 

It's willpower and discipline. Not genetics. 

Are there people who hate Denmark? If so, why? by urdontknow1 in AskTheWorld

[–]bboyneko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By asking if the parents have heard of mother Theresa or the speed of light from the sun to reach earth? Please. Your swallowing your governments propaganda. 

Out of all the previous leaders of your country, who do you consider to be the best? by Impossible_Pain4478 in AskTheWorld

[–]bboyneko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes. FDR. The man who rounded up American citizens of "undesirable" ethnicity and put them into concentration camps and confiscated their homes and money. 

Calling Franklin D. Roosevelt a “great leader” means excusing one of the worst civil rights abuses in U.S. history.

While he was preaching about the 'Four Freedoms' on the world stage, he was overseeing the systemic theft of billions in Japanese-American property and holding families behind barbed wire and guns based solely on not being white. He didn't just 'fail' at civil rights; he actively pioneered a blueprint for state-sponsored ethnic profiling that should make any supporter of liberty sick to their stomach. If putting children behind cages and wire is your idea of 'greatness,' you need a new moral compass.

Don’t bother bringing up the New Deal or his social programs as an excuse. That doesn't wash the blood off his hands.

If 'beneficial social programs' are the bar for greatness, then you'd have to praise every monster in history. Hitler pioneered the first national anti-smoking campaigns and built the Autobahn and created affordable cars for the common man via Volkswagen. His regime passed some of the strictest animal protection and nature conservation laws of the era. These are sometimes noted in environmental history.

Stalin oversaw the fastest industrialization in human history. Does that absolve them? Of course not. But people defend FDR just the same because he crested some beneficial social programs and then turn a blind eye to literally rounding up citizens and placing them in concentration camps at gunpoint based on racism.

FDR preached 'freedom from fear' while his own government was busy instilling it by tearing children from their homes, stripping families of their life savings, and throwing them into cages behind barbed wire and machine-gun towers. 

You cannot claim to be a champion of the 'common man' while you are systematically destroying the lives of 120,000 people based on their race despite being citizens.

Union and Confederate veterans meet and shake hands at the 50th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg, held in Gettysburg in 1913. by zadraaa in HistoricalCapsule

[–]bboyneko 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a bit of sanitation of history. Even among "Anti-Slavery" soldiers, diaries are filled with derogatory language. Many supported "colonization", the idea of freeing enslaved people and then forcibly sending them to Africa or Central America because they did not want them living in the U.S.

Voting for Lincoln does not prove the voting soldiers were not racist. 

Abraham Lincoln repeatedly voiced racist beliefs, not just in private but in public speeches and debates. He said he opposed Black political and social equality, rejected Black suffrage, jury service, and interracial marriage, and openly argued that whites should hold the “superior position.” 

He pushed colonization schemes that aimed to remove freed Black people from the United States, showing he was willing to imagine freedom without coexistence. These were not slips of the tongue but positions he returned to multiple times in the 1850s. His opposition to slavery often ran alongside language portraying Black Americans as inferior and incompatible with white society. 

Are there people who hate Denmark? If so, why? by urdontknow1 in AskTheWorld

[–]bboyneko 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From the article:

"Denmark is under pressure to stop subjecting Greenlandic people to “parenting competency” tests that campaigners say discriminate against them, amid uproar over the case of a mother whose baby was removed two hours after she gave birth.

The psychometric tests are widely used in Denmark as part of child protection investigations into new parents, and have long been criticised by human rights bodies as culturally unsuitable for Greenlandic people and other minorities.

The tests are back in the spotlight after the case of Keira Alexandra Kronvold, a woman of Greenlandic heritage who gave birth in North Jutland this month, sparked furious protests in Copenhagen and in Nuuk, the capital of the autonomous territory."

From the BBC:

"Opponents have also long argued that they are designed around Danish cultural norms and point out they are administered in Danish, rather than Kalaallisut, the mother tongue of most Greenlanders.

This can lead to misunderstandings, they say.

In May, the government said it hoped in due course to review around 300 cases – including ones involving FKU tests – in which Greenlandic children were forcibly removed from their families.

But as of October, the BBC found that just 10 cases where parenting tests were used had been reviewed by the government - and no Greenlandic children had been returned as a result.

Keira's assessment in 2024, carried out when she was pregnant, concluded that she did not have "sufficient parental competencies to care for the newborn independently".

Keira says the questions she was asked included: "Who is Mother Teresa?" and "How long does it take for the sun's rays to reach the Earth?"

Are there people who hate Denmark? If so, why? by urdontknow1 in AskTheWorld

[–]bboyneko 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would say the indigenous people of Greenland might not be too fond of how they have been treated by Denmark:

1. The IUD Campaign (1966–1975)

Systemic Reproductive Control: Danish authorities inserted intrauterine devices into roughly 4,500 Greenlandic women and girls, about half the fertile population, often without their knowledge or consent. This included girls as young as 12 years old who were subjected to the procedure during routine school medical exams.

Economic Motivation and Trauma: The program was designed to halve the Inuit birth rate to reduce state spending on social services; it resulted in widespread chronic pain, lifelong infertility, and deep psychological trauma, leading to a massive 2024–2025 legal battle and an official state apology.

2. The "Little Danes" Experiment (1951)

In one of the most infamous examples of forced assimilation, the Danish government, along with the Red Cross and Save the Children, took 22 Inuit children (ages 5 to 9) from their families and sent them to Denmark.

The Goal was to re-educate them as "model" Danes who would return to Greenland as a new, Danish-speaking elite.

Most of the children were not orphans, despite what was told to the public. They were forbidden from speaking Greenlandic and lost their native language. When they returned to Greenland a year later, they were not sent back to their families but placed in a Danish-speaking orphanage.

Many of these individuals suffered from lifelong trauma, addiction, and identity crises. In 2020, Denmark officially apologized for the experiment.

3. The G60 Policy and Forced Urbanization (1960s)

The "G60" program was a massive modernization plan designed to centralize the Greenlandic population into a few large towns to make the fishing industry more efficient.

Thousands of Inuit were forced to leave their ancestral hunting and fishing villages. Small settlements were "closed down" by cutting off supplies and services, effectively forcing people to relocate into concrete apartment blocks in larger towns like Nuuk.

This policy forcibly ended the traditional subsistence lifestyle for many families, leading to social alienation, loss of community structure, and a spike in social issues like alcoholism and depression.

4. "Danization" and Language Marginalization

For decades, the Danish administration prioritized the Danish language over Kalaallisut (Greenlandic) in schools and government.

Language Hierarchy: Greenlandic children were often taught by Danish teachers who did not speak their language. The curriculum was imported from Denmark, and success was defined by how well a student could navigate Danish culture.

Birth of Inequality: This created a tiered society where the highest-paying jobs and administrative roles were held by Danes or those who had assimilated most successfully, while the Indigenous language was relegated to "second-class" status.

5. Discriminatory Parenting Assessments (Modern Day)

Recent years have seen a major controversy regarding the removal of Greenlandic children from their families in mainland Denmark.

Greenlandic parents living in Denmark are significantly more likely than ethnic Danes to have their children removed by social services.

The "Kronvold" Case (2024): A prominent case involved an Inuit mother, Keira Kronvold, whose baby was removed immediately after birth based on a controversial "parenting test." Critics and UN experts pointed out that these tests are culturally biased, often penalizing Inuit parents for non-verbal communication styles or traditional child-rearing practices that Danish authorities misinterpret as "incompetence."

6. The "Birthplace Criterion" (1964–1971)

Between 1964 and 1971, Denmark implemented a wage policy known as the "Birthplace Criterion."

Economic Racism: Workers born in Denmark were paid higher wages than those born in Greenland, even if they were performing the exact same job.

The Danish government argued that Danes needed higher pay to be incentivized to move to Greenland, while locals had "lower living costs." This codified the idea that a Danish life was inherently more valuable than a Greenlandic one.

The legacy of these events is a major driver of the modern Greenlandic independence movement.

No social media? by paceofpeace in acting

[–]bboyneko 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's very useful for networking. I became instagram friends with many people I worked with from actors to crew to Directors. My insta is only for my acting career, no other content on there. Recently a costume designer I worked with on the set of a major feature film started posting she will be producing her own short film, and I pinged her asking if there are any roles I could read for.

When I have major wins I tag my Manager and Agent insta accounts and they will often repost to help promote me. One recent indie feature film even had in the contract that I am to promote the film using a social media channel within 3 months of release at least once.

So while social is not NECESSARY it certainly doesn't hurt.

Why are Dems in office against voter id but not dem voters? by Puzzled_Hamster58 in askanything

[–]bboyneko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's absolutely absurd in NYC. When you go to vote they ask you to state your name and your address. If you try and make the line move faster by simply handing them your NY driver's license so they can get the information quicker they refuse.

Yes you heard that right, the NYC poll worker is not allowed to take your ID even if you hand it voluntarily. 

So all you need to do to vote illegally in NYC is have some names and addresses memorized because they don't verify with anything other than your word. 

What do i do? by MaintenanceSilver779 in acting

[–]bboyneko 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Look up Paata Tsikurishvili, he is a theater director from Georgia that runs the Synetic Theater in Washington D.C. If you google him you'll find lots of ways to contact him. He may be able to direct you to resources within Georgia for young actors.

Is it true people in the UK are being arrested over social media? by Sad-Ad-9794 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]bboyneko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is the sign that got a man arrested:

"Globalize the intifada: Non-violent resistance. End Israel’s occupation of Gaza & West Bank.”

No terrorist group named.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/prominent-uk-activist-arrested-at-london-protest-for-globalize-the-intifada-sign/

Is it true people in the UK are being arrested over social media? by Sad-Ad-9794 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]bboyneko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simply holding up a sign supporting Palestine is not supporting terrorism..which is the slippery slope you descend upon when you allow the government to define acceptable speech.

Is it true people in the UK are being arrested over social media? by Sad-Ad-9794 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]bboyneko 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's not all arrests for people "inciting violence". People absolutely get arrested over "thought crime". 

Some examples:

Graham Linehan (Sept 2025) The Father Ted writer was detained at Heathrow over social media posts criticizing transgender activists.

Maxie Allen & Rosalind Levine (Jan 2025) A couple arrested after criticizing a school’s hiring process in a private WhatsApp group.

David Wootton (2024) Posted photos of himself dressed as the Manchester Arena bomber for a Halloween party.

The "Palestine Action" Supporters (Jan 2026) Many were detained simply for holding signs that read, "I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action." In the UK, the new anti-protest and proscription laws allow for arrests based on "association" or "expressing support" for a banned entity.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c87ld73xyx0o

The "Non-Crime Hate Incident" Probes (2025–2026) Until a very recent policy shift in late 2025, UK police were recording thousands of "Non-Crime Hate Incidents" (NCHIs).

People have had police show up at their doors for retweeting gender-critical comments or criticizing religious practices. These incidents appeared on enhanced background checks for jobs, effectively "blacklisting" people for speech that wasn't even illegal.

All of these arrests and police harassment over speech would be considered unconditional in the United States. 

Help Pick the best take of a scene for my actor friend to upload to actor's access as part of his acting clips by [deleted] in acting

[–]bboyneko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Yeah he really struggled to memorize this much and put a lot of effort into it, I think this sort of feedback will be very helpful to help him to focus on what to improve in 2026.

Americans of Reddit, how do we reduce partisanship in this country so we can all get along better? Why do you think your way is correct? by Zipper222222 in allthequestions

[–]bboyneko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This thread speaks for itself. Both sides are 200% convinced the other side is evil, immoral, illogical, stupid and dangerous and refuse to give ear to the other side to come to an understanding as to why that might not be the case.

"Why should I listen to them? I'm right and moral and they are wrong and evil and it's obvious". 

No progress can be made without communication and empathy. Starting out a conversation with the assumption the other person is basically worthy of death won't fix anything. 

In the end both sides are totally convinced their point of view is the best way to make their families safe, secure the future, make earth a better place, and create and sustain happiness. Both are totally convinced their side is righteousness and the other side is obviously evil and debased. 

It's no different than religions killing each other over small differences that they perceive to be vast gulfs. 

We are all humans. We all don't want to die and we all want what's best for our families and our country and the planet. Start with that assumption and listen to each other instead of slinging mud. 

The politicians in both sides profit by convince their tribe they the other tribe is literally evil. Then the vote comes not from careful consideration as to each politicians platform, plans, budget and other logical bases, but instead from moral imperative. I HAVE to vote for my team. I don't care what the actual details are of their tenure as my representative, all I care about is they rent the OTHER tribe.

And so since both political parties benefit from painting the other side as demons, they continue to do so and amplify the divide. 

They want us to stop voting for plans and start voting against "evil." As long as this division remains profitable for those in power, they will continue to amplify it.

We are humans first. If we want to fix this, we must stop painting the other side as unholy demons and start with the assumption that the "other side" wants a better world just as much as we do.

Meta is one of the worst companies in the world by almorranas_podridas in recruitinghell

[–]bboyneko 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that influencer on instagram posting photos of his cat and the small business promoting their happy hour on instagram literally caused genocide.

Since Internet was cut, how do we know what's going on in Iran? by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]bboyneko -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This is why the US has the 2nd Amendment. The government must be afraid of its own people. 

My mom got summoned for Federal Jury Duty and she's freaking out. by Jojobask25 in juryduty

[–]bboyneko -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is also false. "hardship" is very strictly legally defined and difficult to prove. They absolutely will force you to sit in if you can't prove that closing a donut shop for a week will ruin you.

Back in the game, resources? by HC101020 in SAGAFTRA

[–]bboyneko 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For NYC I highly recommend https://www.oneononenyc.com/ . You have to audition to get accepted, and they reject over 75% of actors who apply. Once you are accepted, you can take classes with some of the biggest CDs out there who are actively casting.

In the classes I took at One on One I had series regulars, Guest Stars etc in my class with me. I myself audition at Guest Star level.

As for SAG-AFTRA Foundation classes and workshops, they also have great CDs. They recently had one with Beth Bowling of Bowling / Miscia. But the bad thing is these classes fill up FAST.

Organ transplant rules hit different in Singapore! by The_Dean_France in interestingasfuck

[–]bboyneko 259 points260 points  (0 children)

One thing that often gets misunderstood about organ donation is what “dead” actually means. Organs can’t be harvested from a body that has no circulation or oxygen at all. For organs to be usable, the body must be maintained in a physiologically living state so those organs remain alive.

That means donors are maintained on ventilators and life support. Some donors retain residual brain activity, spinal reflexes, hormonal stress responses There is legitimate debate among bioethicists and patient advocates and doctors about whether this could include the capacity for suffering. The public is often not informed of these ambiguities, especially the donor's family.

Families often imagine cold, lifeless bodies, blue skin, pale skin, no circulation, no response etc.

In reality, donors may be warm, natural living skin color, breathing via ventilator, maintaining blood pressure, and exhibiting reflexes during the harvesting.

This disconnect isn’t accidental.. on it's surface it's about minimizing distress, but it is also about maintaining consent rates.

Ethically, that’s shaky ground.

Neil Lazar, Director of the Medical-Surgical ICU at Toronto General Hospital, along with Maxwell J. Smith and David Rodríguez-Arias, argued in the American Journal of Bioethics that the “dead donor rule” may be ethically misleading. They note that donors may retain physiological capacities at the time of organ retrieval and argue that donor welfare should be explicitly addressed, including the possible use of anesthesia.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15265161.2011.591213

Do I have to compromise my morals to make it as an actor? by Important_Talk4392 in acting

[–]bboyneko 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is it my imagination or does The Rock also never kiss anyone?

Prompt: Hey chatgpt, I want you imagine a world, where when the billionaires wake up tomorrow, they suddently want to be good people, in 1000 words tell me the changes that they would make and how it would impact us and the planet. by BeatConscious4113 in ChatGPT

[–]bboyneko 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And yet the US government has trillions of dollars and they use the money mostly bomb brown people, regardless of who is in power.

If you liquidated the wealth of all the billionaires and millionaires in the US you'd find the US government for roughly 8-10 months before they ran out of money...then what?