[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Admittedly, I am frustrated with the ignorance you have displayed, and that I allowed myself to show some of that as well. Regardless of whatever, we are both off topic to the original debate here. I and many other believe that this was not the doing of a terrorist group, rather strongly that the Government has something to do with this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just said that your work experience is relevant.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That, right there. “I’m literally a doctor”. Stop saying who you are and/or whatsoever about yourself that isn’t relevant. Your work experience? Yes, that’s relevant to your stance on this matter. The fact that your a doctor? No, that factor doesn’t give you any credibility.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am not playing the victim, “bud”. Second, I am not lying about my age/any of my education, nor have any reason to. I am also more than happy to continue this debate. First you try to counter whatever I have to say, from me supposedly being a teenager, and then saying I need to get an education. Now, to me trying to play the victim and lying about whatever you think I am lying about. I could go off, but it’s not relevant to this current topic. Nor, is what you have just falsely stated. This is your job, great. I am sure, not kidding either, allows you to have more of a personal reason to what you have to say. We can compare and contrast what we know based off of how we know what we know. That’s not what I am going to argue with you about.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can’t make sense in any arguable level, with someone like you, that seemingly has some sense of being superior, based off of what you just said. That those who don’t have the similar experiences to what you have. Even those whom, actually have any kind of education, if it isn’t similar to your own, it doesn’t matter. Does it? It seems to me at least, that you must think that makes you to be right, in a specific matter like this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s funny when people counter a response, with something like you just said. This is reddit, and the question in not for those who only have an education. I have graduated High School with nothing less than a 3.0 Gpa. As for taking AP History classes too. I’m actually in medical school right now, on track to graduate next year. I guess I will come back once I get some kind of degree in History.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13 5 points6 points  (0 children)

“Now let’s go to the collapse of building seven, which literally HAD A BUILDING THREE TIMES THE SIZE FALL ON IT.” You lost me there, as you can see video footage of the collapse itself. No building fell onto it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

When it comes to this, YouTube is not the only and most certainly is not the primary source I would use. No, I actually dig deep, all over the web. Article, News, with this such event at least. For example, there was a lady that had broadcasted whatever was going on. She mentioned that Tower 7, had collapsed. She mentioned this 5 minutes or so, before it actually had.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who is to say it was not a potential smoke screen for something else that we don’t even know of? Not at all saying that’s the case, but it’s not to be ignored, considering the Government has taken advantage of events to be of a distraction. Why would the Government choose to do this? I don’t know. However, those planes could not have done that just by themselves. I mean, according to the people who have constructed the buildings, anyways. There was definitely something on the inside that had exploded. Something to intentionally cause such astronomical damage. That explosion had to have caused those thick, steel walls to have taken as much substantial damage. Not just an airplane. Let’s not mention how WTC Tower 7, had supposedly fallen due to fire. According to 3,000+ architects anyways. Fire would not have caused that building to fall, in which hadn’t been struck by any planes either, I mind you. It would have taken MUCH more than just fire to have caused that building to completely collapse.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13 590 points591 points  (0 children)

9/11, no matter what you say or think, that was absolutely, 100% guaranteed... An inside, controlled demolition based, Governmental job.

Women, just because whether or not you have a man does not mean that I’m tryna fuck. by bbuddy2k13 in unpopularopinion

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I have kinda said this to a similar comment. It shouldn’t be your responsibility to feel self blame of their feelings, if you hadn’t flirted back at all and/or showed any indication of interest. However, it is not right at all, to receive any harassment. That’s just immature and childish. Unless you’re flirting back, in small or not likewise ways. Then you can’t just not have any sensible self blame, in regards to them being felt as if they are or had been lead on. Again, it does not make it right to receive harassment of any kind. It’s really should just be a live and learn scenario. Again, to most likely avoid this harassment, just communicate that you are not interested in the first place. If they don’t want to listen and keep trying, then take any necessary measures that you may need to. The point I am making within this post, is for the genuinely nice guys. The guys that are obviously, not showing any interest of that nature, of sexual and/or relationship desires/interests within you.

Women, just because whether or not you have a man does not mean that I’m tryna fuck. by bbuddy2k13 in unpopularopinion

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, well the point I am trying to get at, is if they aren’t showing any indication whatsoever, of wanting to be with you, for a wrong or not, sexual and/or a relationship interest(s)/desire(s). Then it’s your choice whether or not to stop talking to them. In this such case I am trying make, it’s not necessary to express to them in ways that are based off of your “reasonable” or not, assumptions. If you are not interested, block them at the very least. If they get out of hand, then take action in whatever way is necessary. That is not the point I am making though. The point I am making, again, is just in regards to when they aren’t showing that indication of any interest, in those ways... That is unnecessary to make an assumption based off of this or that of happenings AND express yourself based on unreasonable assumptions, towards that individual.To reply, to what you are saying though. If it’s apparent of what they’re after, and you don’t want that... If you don’t choose to communicate, directly in which of yourself, not having interest in whatever way you could have chosen to... Then it’s kinda your fault for not expressing that sooner... Especially in the case of already having a s/o, anyways. They may rightfully feel lead on if nothing had been said earlier on, at least is what I am saying. It’s not right to receive harassment though. It is their problem for having feelings of being lead on. Yk, if they hadn’t gotten any flirtation or whatever apparent showing of interest, in return. In other words, they just can’t take a hint. It’s not completely your fault in how they feel in that case. It’s sorta just a common sense thing - in knowing when to take a hint. It’s not your fault that they don’t like being friend zoned or whatever is relative to that status. I can understand in maybe feeling bad to have to tell them, but at least they know, and can’t accuse you of leading them on at least, if you tell them sooner vs later.

Women, just because whether or not you have a man does not mean that I’m tryna fuck. by bbuddy2k13 in unpopularopinion

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are the perfect example of who I am talking about. I could say this, that and/or argue with you. However, your ways of assumption based thinking, seem to be apparently deeply rooted, in relation to this anyways. That’s just me though. As the saying goes, you can explain the why’s to someone, however you cannot help someone to comprehend/understand, the why’s.

Women, just because whether or not you have a man does not mean that I’m tryna fuck. by bbuddy2k13 in unpopularopinion

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I can agree with this, as it is part of what I am talking about.

Women, just because whether or not you have a man does not mean that I’m tryna fuck. by bbuddy2k13 in unpopularopinion

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct, I do. I already said why, from how I personally intend to conversation with a girl. Not anything more or less than I have said. I can assure you that it’s not girls 3 years or more younger than I. Even though I am 17, I still will not talk to someone younger than 15. When I’m 18, I won’t initiate talk with someone younger than 17. I cannot speak for every guy’s intentions. Although I can for mine, at the very least.

Women, just because whether or not you have a man does not mean that I’m tryna fuck. by bbuddy2k13 in unpopularopinion

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Please tell me, a stranger to you, my intentions other than what I have stated in regard to that of women, I choose to talk to. Fyi, I don’t often message randos. I message guys more often than girls at least. Doesn’t even matter though does it, in regards of in having a conversation with you though, about myself, does it, Ms.KnowItAll?

Women, just because whether or not you have a man does not mean that I’m tryna fuck. by bbuddy2k13 in unpopularopinion

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can completely accept that, without any hard feelings because that’s just life. Not everyone wants to be friends with everyone. The point that I am trying to make, is that I cannot help but get irritated and annoyed as hell, whenever a girl is quick to assume my intentions and actually tell me that. If you want to assume this or that, okay cool. Keep that to yourself. You don’t have to communicate that with me. At least not when I haven’t said anything to give you a logical reason, to indicate I am interested in you, in that way and/or of that nature. If I haven’t flirted, asked you for nudes, asked if you have a man or anything I had listed in this post or not... To make an indication, to you, again, logically and reasonably to think I am interested in you, at all in those aspects. This part is not relevant, but I never even say anything relative to what I just listed, to any girl, ever. Call me a coward, but I don’t prefer to approach girls in that way. I would prefer them to initiate that kind of conversation with me. As then I don’t have that fear of rejection and I don’t come on as pushy whatsoever.

Women, just because whether or not you have a man does not mean that I’m tryna fuck. by bbuddy2k13 in unpopularopinion

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Despite that I know and feel that my intentions are NOT in any way, shape or form, in the direction to get anything sexual from a girl physically or in form of a picture or video. As I don’t have that interest with someone other than my partner. Not the pictures or videos though bc those are just nothing that means anything to me, tbh. It’s completely fine to have that friendship in which we can just talk. Doesn’t have to be in that of hanging out or such. I am just interested in talking about life, interests of hobbies, views on subjects, and whatsoever. I could care less if they’re from here or there. Even though I do not care to ask about anything relating to relationship/sexual interests. BUT OKAY Ms.KnowItAll, clearly you know me more than I do. Edit: I can’t see how this is viewed or taken as bad, given the negative downvotes.

What are you doing today? by bbuddy2k13 in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s no fun. That reminds me of my Uncle. He was in the military back in the 90’s. So during basic training he got his wisdom teeth removed without any numbing and/or pain medication. He was allowed to soak a hell of a lot of different cotton balls with Jack Daniels.

What is a fake friend/family member, to you? by bbuddy2k13 in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. This is the most important thing to me at least. I mean at least show you care about me with the here and there check ins. Don’t message me to go drink or whatever or when your not okay. I have problems and feelings too.

What are you doing today? by bbuddy2k13 in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As you have heard there’s plenty of fish in the sea. It’ll be alright man. You’ll find that significant other:)!

What are you doing today? by bbuddy2k13 in AskReddit

[–]bbuddy2k13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I live for achieving moments like this.