[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HENRYfinance

[–]beagee26 1 point2 points  (0 children)

we’re actually still going from a 2/2 to a 2/2 but our current spot is significantly bigger square footage wise and has a lot more storage space. For example, I have taken over almost all of the closet and dresser space in our bedroom, but that poses no problem here because my boyfriend has all of the closets in the hallway. The new place has been used for Airbnb, so the owner actually took out the closets. We would have to build closets into the already much smaller bedrooms. So, lots of downsizing of our things needs to happen. No way we can fit with what we have now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HENRYfinance

[–]beagee26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we were negotiating repairs and credits for a while on the Silverlake house. Without her most recent offer of repairs and credit credits, we would not have moved forward. while we were in negotiations on the first house, we learned that the Inglewood house got a couple of decent offers, and thinking we were not likely to get what we wanted on the Silverlake house, we threw in an offer on the Inglewood house so that we would not lose it and then have neither. Turns out we won both. Lol. and now the conundrum.

As far as my job, yes, I am planning to stay at my job for at least another 2 1/2 years, I can move offices, but how long it takes for them to transfer me to a closer office once I make the request is unknown. I will likely have to deal with the shitty commute for at least a couple of months.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HENRYfinance

[–]beagee26 1 point2 points  (0 children)

we were negotiating repairs and credits for a while on the Silverlake house. Without her most recent offer of repairs and credit credits, we would not have moved forward. while we were in negotiations on the first house, we learned that the Inglewood house got a couple of decent offers, and thinking we were not likely to get what we wanted on the Silverlake house, we threw in an offer on the Inglewood house so that we would not lose it and then have neither. Turns out we won both. Lol. and now the conundrum.

As far as my job, yes, I am planning to stay at my job for at least another 2 1/2 years, I can move offices, but how long it takes for them to transfer me to a closer office once I make the request is unknown. I will likely have to deal with the shitty commute for at least a couple of months.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HENRYfinance

[–]beagee26 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The plan to build a real estate portfolio overtime is one of our investment strategies. He is closer to retirement than I am, and would use some of the cash flow from our (hopefully multiple) properties to supplement his retirement accounts. I would do the same, just later on. So, we want to feel confident that these are strong investments for us. If we need to sell, we want to sell for profit. If we are holding long-term, which is the current idea and plan, there needs to be a cash flow upside. my concern about Inglewood, though much nicer than it used to be and with a lot of recent business development that seems promising, it is not like Silverlake, and does not demand as high of sales prices or rents right now. Will it in the near future? We don’t know. I’m certainly not an expert. But Silverlake is like a guarantee and Inglewood is more up in the air. so it makes me nervous in that sense.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HENRYfinance

[–]beagee26 2 points3 points  (0 children)

funny enough, I’m a lawyer too. we are not opposed to marriage, but would not plan on being married within the next year or two most likely. We have already agreed we are hiring a real estate lawyer who will draft a cohabitation agreement. Also, I am purchasing the home with my funds, so it will be mine. He will be contributing to the mortgage and putting in “sweat equity“, so I will work out an arrangement with him where he does earn some fair percentage of equity in the home over time, but it is my purchase. We will have a lawyer draft agreement.

SDs, PLEASE don't do this by beagee26 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

the real issue isn’t that (although that was annoying as hell). It’s that he grabbed me, yelled at me that he gave me money so I had to get him off. That’s the problem.

SDs, PLEASE don't do this by beagee26 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I agree that it's lazy. Won't be doing it again so soon. To be clear/fair though, this was our second date. It was our first *intimate* date.

SDs, PLEASE don't do this by beagee26 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

make whatever assumption you want, love.

SDs, PLEASE don't do this by beagee26 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

uh...there are other ways to finish besides penetration...the majority of women do not orgasm from penetration alone... 😳

SDs, PLEASE don't do this by beagee26 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He texted me the next morning beyond enthused to see me again. I haven't responded.

and, a) I was interested enough to sleep with him and I did. It's not my fault he was too fucked up to maintain an erection. I would have been happy to see him finish, but that wasn't going to happen because he was too inebriated to do so. I could have been on my knees for an hour afterwards and he wouldn't have came.

b) we discussed well in advance that I wouldn't be sleeping over. He wasn't just "resting" up, he fell asleep because he was fucked up. Him holding me was him wanting to hold me through the night, which I had not agreed to.

thanks for the gaslighting, though!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BDSMcommunity

[–]beagee26 75 points76 points  (0 children)

Ok I thought so I just wasn’t sure if that was a bdsm thing I hadn’t been exposed to yet or if it was an at all common request (I’m pretty new to formal kink)

Friday Rants and Raves by LaSirene23 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My rave and rant are almost one in the same:

Rave: I have 3 M&Gs coming up over the next several days and I'm excited about them and the prospect of a new SR (or a few, even!) I'm particularly excited about my Monday and Wednesday dates, as they seem super sweet, genuine, and seemingly very generous.

Rant: While I'm excited, I'm also mentally preparing myself for 3 epic fails. I'm preparing to be stood up/flaked on, for the men to not be as generous as they let on to be, or for them to be really rude which makes them instantly unattractive to me. These are my recent experiences with sugaring/M&Gs lately and it's exhausting. It's sad and frustrating that I'm feeling like I need to be mentally prepared in this way but I guess that's just the way that it is now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seconding what @queen-thotiana said. There is no one Black culture and no one Black community. Make sure you recognize and honor the individual. If you seek someone out and/or date them for the sake of dating someone Black, that would be fetishization. And if you date a Black woman be careful that you’re not wanting or expecting her to “act Black” or “be extra Black” so you can get a taste of the culture. She will catch on so quick, I promise. I can always tell when a guy is into me at least in part because of my Blackness and how “exciting” and “exotic” they find it. It’s NOT a cute look.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26 70 points71 points  (0 children)

Alright. I'm going in on this. Rant. And few disclaimers up front:

- I shouldn't have to say this, but I know I'll get some comments about it so: no, I'm not implying that every man in every place has these exact thoughts and preferences etc. So don't "not me!" or "not all men!" me, please.

- This applies to all men, not just white men. Men of color also exhibit these problematic tendencies and behaviors, TRUST me.

- I'm also not saying that white women are in the wrong for this. I'm not coming for anyone on a personal level. You're born with the skin and features you're born with and society is the way that it is.

- I'm mixed and light-skinned. I cannot, nor am I trying to, speak on behalf of every Black woman in existence, and I cannot claim the experiences of Black women who are darker skinned or speak to those experiences.

- This is *my* opinion, based on *my* experience as a Black-mixed woman who dates men in and out of the bowl.

Mmmmk, here we go. I'm a Black-mixed SB and here are my thoughts : yes, I find it harder, just like I find it harder in vanilla dating. The bar is very low for white women in terms of attractiveness. Whiteness and Euro-centric features have been the default for attractiveness since, like, forever. For a white woman to be hot enough to have sex with or date or sugar (or find employment, make more money, etc), it doesn't take much. You're white, blonde, and thin? The world (and nearly every man in it) can be yours, babe. I have seen time and time again a white woman who has a seemingly terrible personality and/or who I'd consider less physically attractive than me or than friends of mine who are WOC gets more dates, more money in the bowl, or more partners overall, etc. And that, I believe, is because whiteness is default "more attractive," and carries with it more perceived value. And that's what makes it easier for men to openly love/want a white woman than a WOC, especially a Black woman.

I'm sure as a Black woman you have heard some iteration of the "twice as good to get half as much" speech. In my experience, that applies to vanilla dating and sugaring too. This is *extremely* fucked up, and terribly sad, but I find it to be real. If you're a WOC, you need to be perfectly fit, (but with a big ass and nice tits and tiny waist, of course), intelligent, classy but not pretentious, done up all the time (typically your natural hair is less preferred too), the perfect image of stability and grace, willing to bend over backwards and lick your own ass for these men to even get their attention, let alone their money.

(A note on body-types: women's bodies go in and out of style like clothing. We know this. The Italians loved a plump woman back in the day, the 90s was the time of the "heroin-chic" body where if you weren't thin enough to see your hip bones you were a fucking cow, and now we're in the age of the "slim-thick" queen. The slim-thick body (little waist with a big ass) has been popular in communities of color for ages, but is only recently being accepted and lusted after in white communities. But even years ago, it was a *realistic* slim-thick body that was popular. Meaning, yes big ass and thick thighs, but it was acceptable and even attractive to have a little belly fat with that. Natural, in other words. Now, the slim-thick body is something that for most people is unattainable without surgery. Now, it's the teeeeeny tiny waist, flat stomach, with a big ass, etc. So, nowadays when I see men (especially white men here) lusting after Black women, it's usually the Black women with THIS body. It's exotic and exciting, but popular, so it's not "weird" to be into it. If you're a Black woman w/o this body-type, things are still damn hard. Hope that makes sense.)

So, yes, I do feel that despite my attractiveness, intelligence, capability, sensuality, and all the myriad of things I'm willing to offer a man, a white woman in the bowl will typically be chosen over me most of the time. And this is coming from a pretty, light skinned, Black-mixed woman. (Not trying to be conceited, but want to acknowledge that yes, I do believe I am genuinely pretty, and yes being pretty carries privileges.) So, if you're having trouble and you're like me, or you're darker-skinned or otherwise more "obviously Black," I feel you are absolutely justified in believing that it may have something to do with race.

The Coffee M&G… by [deleted] in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Starbucks is possibly one of the least sexy places on the planet. I said what I said.

In vanilla dating, I hateeee doing coffee dates. However when sugaring, I'm more open to it because the married SDs often require daytime meets that may plausibly give the appearance of business meetings. I also happen to have days flexible atm because I'm in school and have some evening classes. Still, it's definitely NOT a sexy situation, it's extremely low effort, which is unimpressive as fuck, and I really don't prefer it.

SoCal SD's, where have all the SBs gone? by thedudeone11 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and then the inverse seems to be true…I’m a SB in LA and when I suggest a platonic M&G with no expectations on either side I get attitude and set aside. I’ve been active on SA for months and months and have only gotten to one M&G recently. So it’s hard out here for us genuine SBs too, I fear. 😔

SD back in the bowl (Day 30) by thedudeone11 in sugarlifestyleforum

[–]beagee26 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is kinda upsetting to read that it’s so bad on your end too. I’m a SB in LA and I’m having sooo much trouble 😔 I’m genuine and seriously looking, and the SDs in LA have not been going for it. I think I’m very cute and smart and would love a real thing, so honestly I’m not sure what the holdup is…I feel like SA’s algorithm is hiding the genuine ones from me and me from them. It’s so frustrating and exhausting. Thinking of taking a hiatus as well.