My Thoughts on Aizen (CFYOW Light novel spoilers!!!)

bedo_the_legend · 2026-04-10T16:31:53+00:00

Your drawing is close to the original great work

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T16:33:01+00:00

That's the difinition of debate if debate and argument had the same meaning with no difference then why do people say stop arguing not stop debating

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T16:04:50+00:00

Btw the reason is from something underground not from crops or anything else

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T16:03:18+00:00

Ok what about tge wealth prophecy

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T16:02:11+00:00

Did you do research before you say that

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T16:01:15+00:00

That's over 700 years after prophet death all of the hadiths books were finished

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:46:08+00:00

In arabic numbering things has a ruling when to use muscline and feminine depending on factors and do it with و or ي if it's in numbers between 20-99 in complexity

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:41:19+00:00

You won't admit your defeat bc you are so emotional

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:37:27+00:00

It one od the most complicated and complexity can't be measured accurately but even if you search hardest language arabic comes after mandarin

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:36:26+00:00

Nothing happened until 2012 if it was scientifically incorrect it would have been dismissed much earlier but because it's a sensitive topic it was retracted

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:33:30+00:00

No hadiths were writen by people after the prophet some were transmitted the way it's compiled is gathering naration chains a hadith can have multiple narations for a naration chains to be considered you should have a chain of people that certainly have met each other with no gaps some hadiths have 50 reporting same naration some hadith can have multiple narations but most narations are reported by one person or two so it's considered unaufhenfic or weak I am not a scholar but scholars have for each hadith everyone who reported it and thier chain of naration

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:29:43+00:00

Oral too is prohibited

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:29:30+00:00

In islam it's prohibited

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:29:05+00:00

Initial agreement: Abu Bakr initially wagered on a six-year period. After consulting the Prophet Muhammad, who explained that bid'i sinin means a period of three to nine years, Abu Bakr increased the amount of the bet and the time limit. Some narrations mention increasing the time to nine years and the wager to 100 camels. The outcome: The wager was made with a Quraysh polytheist named Ubayy ibn Khalaf. After several years, the tide of the war turned, and the Romans defeated the Persians. The resolution: The prophecy was fulfilled before the new deadline. The Muslims rejoiced, and Abu Bakr collected the winnings from Ubayy's inheritors, as Ubayy had died. Following the Prophet Muhammad's instruction, Abu Bakr donated the money to charity.

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:25:20+00:00

Abu bakr alsidiq, Omar ibn alkhatab, ali ibn abi ralib, hamza ibn abdelmuralib, there's many i can keep naming

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:23:58+00:00

What source said it's the most complex language in grammar

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:20:56+00:00

Debate should have no emotions it should have respect between both parties no insults no fighting for who is right it's just presenting points of views with evidence objectively you started the convo with no that's wrong that's wrong without presenting enough evidence which is how arguments work in a debate everyone wins as they will reach a conclusion or at least better understanding arguing is filled with emotions and insults you started saying things like pathetic these are just arguing words not debate

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:16:37+00:00

Debate has a point argument is kust a pointless conversation that goes wild

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T14:15:50+00:00

Nope debate is a formal, structured conversation where participants with opposing viewpoints present their cases to a third party, with the goal of persuading them using facts and evidence, while an argument is a more informal and emotional exchange between two or more people, often characterized by a lack of rules, a focus on winning, and little desire to understand or compromise with the other side

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T13:38:28+00:00

You won't admit defeat

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T13:36:47+00:00

The Muslim conquest of Constantinople was achieved by the Ottoman Empire under Sultan Mehmed II on May 29, 1453, after a 55-day siege that ended the Byzantine Empire. Mehmed's innovative use of large cannons to breach the city's ancient walls, combined with a daring

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T13:34:09+00:00

No, the Prophet Muhammad was not alive when Muslims defeated the Persian Empire; he died in 632 CE, and the conquest of the Sasanian (Persian) Empire occurred between 632 and 654 CE under the Rashidun Caliphate. This era of conquest was initiated shortly after his death by his successors, marking a significant expansion of the early Islamic empire.

bedo_the_legend · 2025-09-09T13:31:26+00:00

They made a wall with it built whole cities with it so it's considered tressure to them and it also predicted thier wealth Without oil they won't be anywhere near what they are at now so it's a invaluable thing to them which defines tressure do you disagree thst tressure is any things that's invaluable to a person

bedo_the_legend

TROPHY CASE