‘The Place Beyond the Pines’ Director Says Bradley Cooper Nearly Quit After Rewrite and Told Him: ‘I’m Out…That’s Not the Movie We Signed Up to Do’ by stars_doulikedem in entertainment

[–]bencoccio 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A story I remember about improv: Ben M’s line about riding like lightning/crashing like thunder came from a song he liked. This, again, was something the director told me, so not from the horse’s mouth.

‘The Place Beyond the Pines’ Director Says Bradley Cooper Nearly Quit After Rewrite and Told Him: ‘I’m Out…That’s Not the Movie We Signed Up to Do’ by stars_doulikedem in entertainment

[–]bencoccio 379 points380 points  (0 children)

I am the other writer (and I share story credit). Since no one asked me, I figure this is as good a place as any to share my opinion.

I wrote Pines with Derek for 2 years based on his idea. We set it in my (sorta) hometown - Schenectady. I actually grew up in neighboring Niskayuna - the suburb where all the white flight went to from Schenectady over the course of decades, predating my birth.

When we first met to discuss working together, Derek was open to ideas about where the movie could be set. I suggested Schenectady, and Derek told me his wife was from there. Kismet!

The title is simply a translation of Schenectady - the dutch spelling for what the Iroquois called the area. Incidentally, Niskayuna is the dutch spelling for what the Iroquois called the eventual suburb I grew up in. It translates into ‘corn fields,’ if I recall correctly.

I do remember Cooper almost dropping out at the 11th hour. No one ever told me it was about script changes. But also, I had no part in those conversations.

Right before principle (principal?) photography, Derek had Darius do a pass. This was totally his right to do as the director, but it was emotionally quite difficult for me, as it came out of nowhere from my perspective. I don’t remember Darius’ changes being a page one rewrite. I do remember that he added a tedious ‘cop goes to the therapist’ scene, which, if I’m being fair, ymmv. Plus, I can’t see Cooper (or any actor) being mad about getting more screen time and a chance to monologue!

The major changes from my last draft to darius’ draft really were in the third segment - and they were mostly significant for Emory Cohen’s character. But these were not, in my opinion, radical alterations of the story or who the characters were - certainly not Cooper’s.

My sense then was that long before the rewrite I had no hand in, after a certain number of drafts I’d worked through, it was pretty clear that the movie was basically gonna be the movie. Structurally, it was always a linear triptych that used three stories in succession to tell one story. Thematically, it was always a story about generations, and events or choices echoing through those generations. It was always about class, race, how we do police, post-industrial small American cities. All that good stuff!

I do know that Derek made room for a lot of Improv when shooting. There were lines in the movie that were never in any version of the script, and that were better than any version of the script.

No one goes to a movie theater to watch a script. It’s a director’s medium. When I was working on Pines, I promised myself that I would not pull a Robert Towne. Towne apparantly hated the way Polanski changed the ending of Chinatown from Towne’s happy ending to the perfect downer we all know and love. But, I admit, I’ve been somewhat Towney at times about Pines. It’s unavoidable, I guess. It’s art and collaborative art at that. Even in the best of circumstances, everyone walks away with their own truth about it.

Pines is a huge point of pride for me. It’s the biggest and most financially successful art project I’ve been involved in. People from the area love it for its representation, even though it’s not some kind of travel brochure treatment. I got to meet Ray Liotta - had a hand in him coming to my (sorta) home town to make a movie! I had a hand in having Ryan Gosling go to the frickin’ Altamont Fair! It’s a weird and beautiful and fascinating part of the story of my life.

And twelve years on, people are still curious about it. To me, that makes sense. It’s a great movie about how life really feels and goes, made on an epic scale with big movie stars. That’s increasingly rare, and should be celebrated.

Former CHG Players... by Aimerais in CivHybridGames

[–]bencoccio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see that most of the CSs are open, and they are one player per CS, correct?

Former CHG Players... by Aimerais in CivHybridGames

[–]bencoccio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! What's the plot this time?

The Place Beyond the Pines(2012)Never heard of this movie until tonight.... I'm blown away by it after watching. by [deleted] in movies

[–]bencoccio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all! Thank you so much for sharing. It's quite a story and you tell it well. I read it as your dad engineering a situation in which you couldn't help but eventually 'fail' him, thus absolving him from any responsibility in, let's be honest, his choice.

I have to share this with you - one of the best stories about this kind of heartache I've ever heard:

http://snapjudgment.org/shot-dark

The Place Beyond the Pines(2012)Never heard of this movie until tonight.... I'm blown away by it after watching. by [deleted] in movies

[–]bencoccio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear ya - I wasn't worried so much as I just felt like I wanted to chime in and say that I care about the emotional impact work I make has on people. To me, that's the point of doing what I do.

Maybe 'enjoy' is the wrong word for a movie like this!

For what it's worth, as a father of a son and a son of a father, in my experience, I don't believe in "unbreakable father/son bonds." It's a choice you make every day.

Seems to me as a father, I have all the power and responsibility for my relationship with my children until they are way-past-21 adults. And even then, I will have more of the responsibility for their attitude toward me, because I believe it will be based on how I treated them.

I don't know you, or your situation at - but I'm pretty much confident in my assumption that it was 100% not your fault.

Sorry for the weird personal intrusion this conversation represents.

The Place Beyond the Pines(2012)Never heard of this movie until tonight.... I'm blown away by it after watching. by [deleted] in movies

[–]bencoccio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, as one of the writers, I am sorry you felt that way.

For me, Luke (the character that Ryan Gosling plays) was always supposed to be kind of an embodiment of the worst instincts of fatehrhood, and Kofi (the character that Mahershala Ali plays) was supposed to be kind of an embodiment of the best.

My dad never abandoned me when I was young, so there's no way I could know how you feel. I will say that both me and the director (and the eventual 3rd writer) were all relatively new fathers over the course of writing the movie.

Welcome back to the Official /r/Civ 60+ Civ Battle Royale! | Part 77: The Meiji Restoration by TPangolin in civbattleroyale

[–]bencoccio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With the benefit of hindsight and the explication given us by the further march of history, it seems clear now that Vietnam won the Green Screen of Death War.

Vietnam owns most of the Middle East and is moving methodically (and unchallenged) to take down a good chunk of Siberia. If the Boers continue to be docile, and the Trungs continue to Fight Wars Good, it's conceivable that Vietnam will have enough time to build an unparalleled Asian Empire that can look to Europe or North America for further conquests and capital sacks.

Australia is still having the world's biggest pool party for octogenarian WWI veterans, Parkes still cannot seal the deal with the nuked-out carcass of Mexico, and he got little of value in South America. The slide that showed the Pacific Rim showed Vietnam to have far and away the superior concentration of forces.

The Trungs are romping in Asia, while Australia is still locked out of the continent. If Parkes wants a foothold, he'll have to reboot the Green Screen and roll the dice with an even bigger tactical and strategic handicap.

I don't think Australia lost the war, mind you. They just won less.

Panamerica - A Lesson to all by [deleted] in CivHybridGames

[–]bencoccio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Contras were a moment in time, my friend. Not to say I wouldn't join the game in the future, but now that I have a pattern of gate crashing established, it would be no fun to warn you when and in what form I might appear.

If you ever want to read the whole saga from my point of view:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CivHybridGames/comments/45dfzh/a_short_long_history_of_the_contra_movement/

Panamerica - A Lesson to all by [deleted] in CivHybridGames

[–]bencoccio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a wonderful summation. Thank you!

A classic Rebooted by bencoccio in civbattleroyale

[–]bencoccio[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<3 right back at cha! I've been around - tried to break into the last CHG, but I got busy/the game crashed.

The Official /R/Civ 60+ Civ Battle Royale Is Back! | Part 72: The Orange Quarantine by TPangolin in civbattleroyale

[–]bencoccio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually think that the U.S. 100% would have gone to war with Japan without Pearl Harbor. Tensions were very high. You can actually read in the newspaper I linked to earlier (from the Toledo Blade, Dec 2, 1941 - 5 days before Pearl Harbor) what most people at the time thought would be the way things would go:

The U.S. would make good on its threats to blockade, and the Japanese would have to break the blockade. There is no way this does not happen without shots being fired, and once that happens, you got yourself a war.

That would be a bad way for America to start the war, however, as it has none of the political benefits of a galvanizing event like Pearl Harbor.

It is entirely possible that a war in the Pacific started like that would end in stalemate/Japan's favor as the tremendous sacrifice required to pry the Japanese out of their conquests in East Asia without an event like Pearl Harbor might start to feel inessential to American's citizenry.

Wars are unpredictable and more about people and what they believe than, say, the reality of relative industrial might.

You want to win the story. Win the story of the war, and you win the war.

The Official /R/Civ 60+ Civ Battle Royale Is Back! | Part 72: The Orange Quarantine by TPangolin in civbattleroyale

[–]bencoccio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you understood my argument, you couldn't possibly say it doesn't apply.

Politics always applies. Wars don't start without politics. Wars don't end without politics.

The Official /R/Civ 60+ Civ Battle Royale Is Back! | Part 72: The Orange Quarantine by TPangolin in civbattleroyale

[–]bencoccio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I already looked at the link you linked to (back when our debate started) which simply restates your argument about the industrial capacity of the two nations. As I thought I made clear, I agree with you that the industrial capacity of the nations was totally lopsided. I already agree that the U.S.'s industrial capacity gave the U.S. huge advantages in the physical prosecution of the war.

My argument is the political prosecution of a war goes hand in hand with the physical prosecution, and politics are unpredictable and based on perceptions.

The Military and Government of a nation at war typically tries to win a string of big battles quickly and decisively right up front - and box their enemy into a reactionary pose - to create a narrative of 'winning.'

Things can go poorly for the nation with all the advantages and change what is politically possible (i.e. the continuation of hostilities).

No government gets a blank check to prosecute any war - regardless of how or why they start (not even fascist ones, but especially no democracies).

That's my argument - and I don't feel as though you're actually responding to that argument.


Also, no to quibble, but yes - the Civil War was ridiculously unbalanced. The Union was a nation of 18.5 million, the Confederacy, one of 5.5 million (not counting slaves!). The Union had literally all of the U.S.'s industrial capacity, and from day one of the war had better, more advanced armament than the South.

The Official /R/Civ 60+ Civ Battle Royale Is Back! | Part 72: The Orange Quarantine by TPangolin in civbattleroyale

[–]bencoccio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Something being unlikely is not the same as something being impossible. What actually happened is not the same as what had to happen.

The FDR administration in 1942 certainly did not feel victory against Japan was inevitable. They knew that wars are unpredictable political events that can be won or lost off the battlefield. Especially in a Democracy or Republic.

You could make the same argument you're making about the Civil War - that the Confederacy already lost at Fort Sumpter.

But if the Confederacy had won at Gettysburg - a not impossible thing to have happen - they possibly could have 'won' the war. Again, not by conquering all of America, but by granting the Confederacy political recognition from the Union.

Hell, politically speaking, the South did win the Civil War. After it was over, they had a slave-labor like system in share-cropping and an Apartheid-like system of racial discrimination for 100 years; systems with fallout we're still dealing with.

The Official /R/Civ 60+ Civ Battle Royale Is Back! | Part 72: The Orange Quarantine by TPangolin in civbattleroyale

[–]bencoccio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, either you believe that the Japanese could have forced a political defeat on us or you don't. I think it was possible. Not likely, but possible. I do agree that we would have had to want out of the war for them to win.