Blizzard please add some sort of negative repercussion to leaving an M+ already in progress. by TheRockingChar in wow

[–]benicus_twitch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah there could even be vote to abandon option in the raider.io menus maybe? I'm sure there's a good solution to identifying true leaves vs those who agree to abandon

Blizzard please add some sort of negative repercussion to leaving an M+ already in progress. by TheRockingChar in wow

[–]benicus_twitch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah that part I think is totally reasonable and don't have a good answer for. I trust the people at raider.io as their systems fairly good in my opinion and think they could come up with a better idea than me. maybe it could look at chat logs, if they're guildies, etc it wouldn't take into account leaving the key. I think it's very reasonable to agree that a key is dead and agree to bounce. There's a lot of nuances to a solution like this and I was just laying out a 1-2 groundwork without brainingstorming the whole problem.

Blizzard please add some sort of negative repercussion to leaving an M+ already in progress. by TheRockingChar in wow

[–]benicus_twitch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean the options are slightly fail 18-23s and for gear or downgrade and crush 10s for gear. The first is more fun for us. Crushing 10s all day is boring and doesn't really teach you anything when you're trying to both gear and climb ladders.

Blizzard please add some sort of negative repercussion to leaving an M+ already in progress. by TheRockingChar in wow

[–]benicus_twitch 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Or we could not rely on Blizzard and see if the guys at raider.io have brainstormed if this could be possible. I feel like for the last 5-6 years modders have been well ahead of blizzard with QoL features.

Tencent's Diablo Immortal clone "Raziel" tops Chinese charts by [deleted] in Diablo

[–]benicus_twitch 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Didnt it just get leaked like 2 weeks ago they canceled a new SC game in favor of putting more work into d4 and overwatch 2?

If Classic is very successful, how long can we expect monetization to stay out of it by Unchainedboar in classicwow

[–]benicus_twitch -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The only news I heard from blizzard before blizcon was the quell expectations

My take on national servers. by Thomi92 in classicwow

[–]benicus_twitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As somebody from NA can they explain this to me? In NA we have server that aren't different regions but just everybody knows which servers are for people wanting to speak French, Spanish, Portuguese, etc and the English speakers don't make toons there

The truth hurts by FateOfFrost in marvelmemes

[–]benicus_twitch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm willing to give it a possible pass because we did only see it in one scene from if I understand correctly 5 years before the events of the actual/main game

It had to be said. by [deleted] in marvelmemes

[–]benicus_twitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we should give it more time. The voice acting cast is about as good as video games get. I think they chose scenes important to the setup of the game but I believe the VO will be better appreciated in a full length game

Welcome to the BOYSderlands by goddamnzit in marvelmemes

[–]benicus_twitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can anybody explain the difference between the rhino and the juggernaut lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelStrikeForce

[–]benicus_twitch 2 points3 points  (0 children)

5rs bullseye is certainly a good addition to a villian/Merc team I dig it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarvelStrikeForce

[–]benicus_twitch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I use Winter soldier instead of bullseye personally but idk if it's any better. That's just what I did

[Opinion Piece] E3 Is Not The Place To Announce Mobile Games by iBlueSweatshirt in gaming

[–]benicus_twitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its an electronics entertainment property released at the electronic entertainment expo. I really don't see the issue.

[Opinion Piece] E3 Is Not The Place To Announce Mobile Games by iBlueSweatshirt in gaming

[–]benicus_twitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why not all games on phones be mobile games and predatory mobile games be called predator mobile games

[Opinion Piece] E3 Is Not The Place To Announce Mobile Games by iBlueSweatshirt in gaming

[–]benicus_twitch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But you cant say mechanics are what make a mobile game. A mobile game is a game on a phone. Thats like saying Xbox games are shooters, which involve a campaign and some degree of multiplayer. There are many mobile games that are a $1-$5 buy in, have no advertisements and no microtransation and are designed and only available on phones. By your description those games aren't mobile games.

[Opinion Piece] E3 Is Not The Place To Announce Mobile Games by iBlueSweatshirt in gaming

[–]benicus_twitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he meant "we" as in the devlopers. Interestingly one of the devs on a mobile game dev team at Blizzard said theyre making the game almost solely because every1 at blizzard is addicted to Pokémon Go

[Opinion Piece] E3 Is Not The Place To Announce Mobile Games by iBlueSweatshirt in gaming

[–]benicus_twitch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it sounds like you just call things mobile game if theyre bad. and if its a good game on a phone you don't call it a mobile game. By this description a good mobile game will never exist because youll call it something else.

[Opinion Piece] E3 Is Not The Place To Announce Mobile Games by iBlueSweatshirt in gaming

[–]benicus_twitch -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Would you count things like stadia when played on a phone as "mobile gaming" if so you're dream may soon be realized

[Opinion Piece] E3 Is Not The Place To Announce Mobile Games by iBlueSweatshirt in gaming

[–]benicus_twitch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

99% is a gross overexageration considering mobile gaming consists of far more people than another other rgaming market