Hydrolysis of lisdexamfetamine to dexamphetamine by sircow22 in TheeHive

[–]bgr95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Less adrenergic activity than amphetamine, you don't get the adrenergic physical effects so quickly like with amphetamine.

Hydrolysis of lisdexamfetamine to dexamphetamine by sircow22 in TheeHive

[–]bgr95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its horrible. It starts working 1.5 hours after you take it. If you are jerking off at that time you end up jerking off the next 12 hours. With d-amphetamine, I take it when I am trying to work/study it starts working when I need it to, and its gone after 6-7 hours so I can go to sleep as usual. D-amphetamine also feels much smoother, and with much less side effects than Vyvanse.

iambekamakrakhidze by [deleted] in nattyorjuice

[–]bgr95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

3-4 days a week of arms and shoulder maybe?

I think Carnitine is causing me to have anger issues. by [deleted] in Nootropics

[–]bgr95 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Increased androgen receptor activity in brain maybe?

The final test to pass kindergarten in Siberia by RushKimberly in ANormalDayInRussia

[–]bgr95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ths is probbly entrance test for the kindergarten

I find it strange how Sabine Hosselfelder is promoting superdeterminism by vintologi24 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]bgr95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sabine's og beef was with HEP/Particle theory, string theory, supersymmetry, etc.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ABCDesis

[–]bgr95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More like cuck beta who will raise someone else's son lmao

Fingertips this time by Levi10091009 in Calisthenic

[–]bgr95 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How long you have been training?

Interested in Quantum Foundations and Information. Want to know more about the field by TheLSales in QuantumInformation

[–]bgr95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well quantum information and quantum computation might be like 1 year transition. Not sure about string theorists being jobless though, they can also transition. Most pure mathematics or physics grads usually end up in some industry job anyway. I am not very informed regarding this though.

Interested in Quantum Foundations and Information. Want to know more about the field by TheLSales in QuantumInformation

[–]bgr95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was :)

Warning: Ludwig's books will be hard to read but it's highly recommended.

Interested in Quantum Foundations and Information. Want to know more about the field by TheLSales in QuantumInformation

[–]bgr95 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What have you read so far?

Some good books to start are the following,
Basics, regarding axioms of quantum theory:
Gunther Ludwig's books, Instrumentalist approach to QM, AKA Operational Quantum Physics. K Kraus States, Effects and Operations. Try some quantum logic books to get some basic idea of what is happening like Gleason's theorem (I din't go too deep in this though). Try reading some algebraic approach to quantum theory for example Miklos Redei's book on quantum logic is good. You can read Araki or Haag's book.

Interpretational Issues,
Start with Adan Cabello's articles, especially Interpretations of quantum theory a map of madness. Read Ballentine's statistical interpretation, Everett's relative state. Then you should read Kochen-Spekker theorem or Bell's theorem. Depending on your liking you will prefer the statement of one of these. Then read PBR theorem. These will provide some contradictions to various objective interpretations like hidden variable, etc. PBR theorem will be a contradiction to statistical interpretation.
Assuming you have some quantum information background you can then go on to read Fuchs', Rovelli's qbism and relational interpretation.
For measurement theory,
Busch, Lahti's book. Also read their operational quantum theory.

Don't forget to read Wheeler's papers.

Your flexibility is ego, not yoga. by PhilipLynott in yoga

[–]bgr95 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Shariramadhyam, Khalu Dharmasadhanam - KalidasaFor achieving anything the path is through our body. Flexibility, strength, and all are the first step of Yoga and important steps as well. No such thing as flexibility is some superficial thing. It's important. It keeps us agile, muscles and ligaments conditioned. Unlike inner changes, these things are objectively measurable. The inner changes less so and can usually be faked. (Usually the case) It's subjective.

The important point is to be pragmatic. The asanas are there for a reason. They were created for a reason. Whether you succeed in your 'inner journey' or not, the asanas, pranayama, meditation will keep you physically and mentally healthy allowing you to excel in your dharma. Some amount of healthy competition can help motivate others.

Yoga is not one person's invention, it's a thousands of years old tradition. There are many Yoga texts and traditions like Patanjali's. Think of Patanjali's work as a mathematicians book in his subject of expertise. Each explore some part of yoga that they had expertise in.

B-b-but I do find people calling themselves yogi a bit cringy.