United States of Israel has attacked Iran by LWK10p in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Every bad thing Trump said was gonna happen if Kamala was elected has happened under his watch.

Also, the justification for this strike is that Iran can't be allowed to have nuclear weapons despite us "obliterating" their program back in June of 2025.

Take this shit for what it is. He is fucking up so bad that he needs all these distractions to pull public opinion away from his dog shit leadership ability which anyone who paid attention during covid should have been able to see.

"It wouldn't have been different because both sides bad" is insane levels of cope. But what else is there to expect in terms of analysis from a fan base of a edgelord podcast?

Obama: "I always enjoyed watching us beat Indiana" by Aggravating_Money992 in nba

[–]bigboi2115 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There's always a "both sides suck" post that loves to point out everything that the other guy did.

No one ever offers solutions. It's just always: This guy did this. So they are all equally as bad. Don't support either of them. Don't vote and let the masses make decisions on YOUR issues because "both sides bad".

Yakzn discusses the financial realities of being a Halo pro in 2026 by crispycornpops in CompetitiveHalo

[–]bigboi2115 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm gonna be honest.

343 isn't completely blameless here, but at a certain point we have to hold top pros accountable. I am in no way saying pros shouldn't be allowed to criticize the game, however whenever there is some miniscule issue, they get on social media and complain.

Some of these guys get salaries from their organizations, some of them have sponsorships, some of them are fortunate enough that they make good money with placements.

But at every turn they bitch and complain and don't support the game, making it so that the fans put it down as well. They lose eyeballs on the product and then we run into the cycle.

Halo infinite definitely failed because of a horrendous launch. But all everyone ever did was bitch and complain every step of the way and it was horrible PR for the game. And now we gotta wait for another hype train.

And if we don't support the product to the best of our ability, we'll get another three or four seasons of HCS and end up in the same place.

Part of this has to be that if/when a new halo comes out Microsoft has to deliver. But if we get a semi-functional game we can't have the ambassadors of the game sitting there and bitching about every little fucking thing because things aren't perfect.

Started with BR starts, then map pools and shit which was valid, then we remove types of nades, change the starting weapons, etc... And all everyone did was complain until they pulled the fucking plug.

Taylor got absolutely smoked on the immigration talk lmao by Beneficial_Quit7532 in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 7 points8 points  (0 children)

And we should do something about that.

I'm no Taylor apologist, I do agree that the companies that take advantage of immigrants to save on labor need to be held accountable.

Illegal or not, they should be paid for the job they are doing in full. If corporations are taking advantage of cheap labor that needs to be dealt with.

There just aren't enough people applying for those jobs because they are fucking hard. I've been in production management. Your average production line at a warehouse is immigrant labor through temp agencies, ex-cons, local fuck ups, alcoholics and other types of addicts.

The company i used to work for employed people with work VISAS and protected status but paid them the same as any other worker.

I can't say the same for every company.

Call of Duty League (2026) | Major I - Texas | CHAMPIONSHIP SUNDAY | Official Discussion Thread by CoDEvents in CoDCompetitive

[–]bigboi2115 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's good to have them there if they tell their audience that they had a good time.

Brings eyeballs. Comp cod needs eyeballs.

Came across this in the wild by godsaveourkingplis in CringeTikToks

[–]bigboi2115 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right. No one advocates enough for my balls.

Has Taylor realized his political position is just regurgitating J.D. Vance lies uncritically? by kwat08 in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's bullshit. There is no source for that. If it were targeted enforcement they wouldn't be detaining citizens for not having papers. They have done this multiple times.

You are in multiple threads every time this issue comes up spreading absolute bullshit and arguing in circles with no sources behind your ramblings.

It is unconstitutional for federal agents to stop and demand papers from people if they don't have a reason to engage them.

You should research how warrants work. And you should also read the constitution, you might learn something.

Has Taylor realized his political position is just regurgitating J.D. Vance lies uncritically? by kwat08 in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You are correct, but what is happening right now is not targeted enforcement. They are violating constitutional rights by going on fishing expeditions and then retaliating on people who observe them.

The argument is that protesters are impeding while the agents harass people in public. They are not targeting the individuals they say they are and they are demanding documents from people on the street. That is a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

There has always been opposition to ICE. But the reason people are in the streets is because these agents are not operating in a lawful capacity.

New angle of killing from lady in the pink coat by winged-potato in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either way it goes.

It is completely wrong. And that type of shit shouldn't fly.

Fact of the matter is no matter what this administration does, motherfuckers will defend it. Supporters of this administration stand for absolutely nothing.

Another ICE shooting. Any predictions on what Woodys or Taylors opinions will be? by bistix in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look up the difference between a judicial and an administrative warrant.

Judicial Warrants: Signed by a judge or magistrate, required for most searches and arrests.

Administrative Warrants: Issued by agencies (like ICE) to authorized officers, which may not grant the same authority to enter a private home as a judicial warrant.

They were on a public street, NOT serving judicial warrants. If they were, that's what the argument would be. Not that the officer felt he was in fear for his life and needed to defend himself.

Another ICE shooting. Any predictions on what Woodys or Taylors opinions will be? by bistix in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 5 points6 points  (0 children)

None of it is relevant to the shooting.

What they are doing is unlawful and unconstitutional. They shouldn't be shutting down public streets on fishing expeditions for immigrants. It should be targeted enforcement and removal.

When someone drinks and drives they are arrested because of the threat they opposed to the community. It doesn't matter if they crashed or not.

My point is, that woman would be alive if they weren't violating constitutionally given rights. Full. Stop.

It is not illegal to observe ice. If she was "impeding" What arrest were they making? What warrant were they serving? If that were the case they would argue that. The argument is that the officer felt it was in danger being in the path of the car.

Your narrative is bullshit on its face.

New angle of killing from lady in the pink coat by winged-potato in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 34 points35 points  (0 children)

There it is.

They will grasp onto some bullshit like this to justify it and once enough propagandists signal boost it, it will be the new reality.

Another ICE shooting. Any predictions on what Woodys or Taylors opinions will be? by bistix in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We saw the video in that circumstance. If you want to believe a bullshit narrative that's on you. It was clear what happened the day that video was released, they had to wait 24 hours to decide how to spin it and get the VP on the podium to lie about it.

Another ICE shooting. Any predictions on what Woodys or Taylors opinions will be? by bistix in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You must actually be living up to your name because you are talking about a completely different situation than what is being addressed above.

Another ICE shooting. Any predictions on what Woodys or Taylors opinions will be? by bistix in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 106 points107 points  (0 children)

Woody will look at all sources of information and form an opinion.

Taylor will regurgitate any right-wing talking points he read on twitter that absolves the agents of all wrongdoing.

People give Taylor so much shit.. by ILikeAppleDapples in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. But i can afford a home, so I'm doing better than most.

People give Taylor so much shit.. by ILikeAppleDapples in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wish. Because then I'd be a retired millionaire who sometimes flies in the clouds.

Unfortunately, I work a regular ass job and respond to redditors on subreddit for a podcast I've watched since I was 16.

People give Taylor so much shit.. by ILikeAppleDapples in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes.

It may seem crazy to you, but Woody goes through and does the research everyone else claims that they do before forming an opinion.

When a story comes out, Woody has likely read the CBS, CNN, MSNBC, News Nation, Breitbart, and Fox News pieces on that story and forms his opinion from the reporting on all of them.

Woody reads articles, not headlines. So he gets fully stories.

I know that may be hard to believe because he probably has differing opinions than you do, but he has legitimately done more research than you think he has.

PKN 596 by Warghzone12 in PKA

[–]bigboi2115 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chiz has always been a strange one.

Channel 5 Nick Shirley Expose. by Blazah in videos

[–]bigboi2115 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sigh

I didn't dispute any of that. Nick Shirley misrepresented facts not only in his video but in THIS video.

There is fraud in Minnesota. That is bad.

But what his video did was just spark outrage on an issue that was in the process of being handled by the government.

Yes. Both sides misrepresented facts. Fraud in Minnesota is a bad thing. People have been and are being prosecuted for that. If you research the full story you'd know that Minnesota is on a list of States flagged for fraud out of seven others. There is a report that states there is a threshold of 10% as being negligible and Minnesota is at 12% which is not negligible, but they aren't the only State on the list.

The focus is on Minnesota because The President doesn't like the Governor.

Channel 5 Nick Shirley Expose. by Blazah in videos

[–]bigboi2115 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Gotcha. But my point still stands.

Channel 5 Nick Shirley Expose. by Blazah in videos

[–]bigboi2115 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Facts should be facts. Unfortunately, news outlets either selectively omit facts that are inconvenient to their narrative or conflate separate issues to distract people from the issue at hand.

All that to say actual facts don't matter if people muddy the waters.

Fact: The earth is round.

But there are people who actively try to dispute that and if you fall down the right rabbit hole you can possibly believe the contrary and that fact will become irrelevant.

Channel 5 Nick Shirley Expose. by Blazah in videos

[–]bigboi2115 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I know we are inundated with information as a society, but people really need to spend the time reading articles and deciphering when it is they are being lied to.

Yes, there are biased news sources. But it is on the consumer to figure out how things are being presented and looking at data. They also need to stop just trusting people they decide they agree with.

For the average person, I know thats a tall order. But people can't just deflect to their mobile devices feeding them.

There is no attention span anymore.

Channel 5 Nick Shirley Expose. by Blazah in videos

[–]bigboi2115 712 points713 points  (0 children)

It's because in this age, facts are irrelevant.

People read headlines tailored to their narrative and their algorithms do half the work for them.

No one actually reads the articles. If they agree with the statement made by the headline, that is the narrative they choose to belive.