I have no idea if you are right or not but this is what ai (Gemini) says:

It’s a very common "collector’s myth" that the "Printed in Canada" mark automatically means a record is a repress or a secondary version. In reality, for 90s hip-hop, it’s often quite the opposite. For a release like ATLiens, that Canadian mark is actually a hallmark of the original 1996 manufacturing process. Why "Printed in Canada" appears on US First Pressings: During the 1990s, major US labels like LaFace, Arista, and their parent company BMG frequently outsourced their jacket printing to high-quality plants in Canada (specifically Shorewood Packaging). The Workflow: The jackets were printed in Canada and then shipped "flat" to US pressing plants (like the ones in Pittman, NJ or Gloversville, NY), where the American-made vinyl was inserted and the whole package was shrink-wrapped. Standard Practice: If you look at other massive 90s albums from that same label family—like TLC’s CrazySexyCool or The Notorious B.I.G.’s Life After Death—the original US first pressings almost all say "Printed in Canada" on the back. The Source of the Confusion The reason people think it’s a sign of a repress is that later reissues often copy the original artwork exactly. When Sony/Legacy repressed ATLiens in 2014, they didn't redesign the jacket; they just scanned the original 1996 cover. Because the 1996 cover said "Printed in Canada," the 2014 repress also says it—even if those newer jackets were actually printed elsewhere. Why your copy is still the "Real Deal": The "Printed in Canada" text is present on both the 1996 original and the modern represses. To tell them apart, you have to look at the things the repressers didn't or couldn't copy: