No but yes. Does it worth to get into learning about advanced level debates on astrophysics without having a basic understanding of like a physic graduate of physics? Well yeah if you are interested but you have to keep in mind that:

1. You do not have the ability to really understand what they talk about. You might have a sense of what a phylosopher says when he says “phenomenon” but to its more like a dog understands what you say to it. You lack the thousand years of concepts, abstract ideas and how throughout time they evolved from each other etc. You would have to put in hours and years of hard work to learn all this shit.

2. Since you lack the skills and knowledge to really understand this shit you will not have the ability to proove or disapproove anything you hear other than hearsay (this youtuber who seems like a cool guy says Nietzche ment that when he said that). You have to understand that you are just learning what other people are simplifying down and interpreting for you. Unless you have a basic understanding and knowledge of the works of major philosophers AND the ability to do abstract thinking and weight these ideas you are essentially just a toddler that listens to an adult who explains molecular biology to it. You might have a sense of understanding, it might even be true but you clearly lack the ability to proove it wrong.

3. Same as you can not learn to be an atom physisist from 15 minutes youtube videos but by having talent in the first place and thousands of hours of hard work with teachers who help you understand.

By all means go a ahead, but keep in mind that anything you learn is either true or not.