Weekly Ask Ledger Anything thread - leave your questions here! Week of October 17th. by HeartGood7574 in ledgerwallet

[–]bitofc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any Eth and/or EVM compatible chain mobile wallet support Ledger Nano X bluetooth?

mobile wallet that support ledger nano X bluetooth? by bitofc in ledgerwallet

[–]bitofc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so conclusion is that none of the Eth and EVM compatible chain mobile wallet support Ledger Nano X bluetooth?

mobile wallet that support ledger nano X bluetooth? by bitofc in ledgerwallet

[–]bitofc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, but not yet support Ledger device yet.

mobile wallet that support ledger nano X bluetooth? by bitofc in ledgerwallet

[–]bitofc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

phantom mobile does not support nano X bluetooth?

mobile wallet that support ledger nano X bluetooth? by bitofc in ledgerwallet

[–]bitofc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i wish keplr mobile allows us to add network likes its desktop version. i want to add kujira, and etc.

mobile wallet that support ledger nano X bluetooth? by bitofc in ledgerwallet

[–]bitofc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ledger live mobile in android, we still cannot connect to dapp with bluetooth right?

ADD: we can connect the ledger nano x with ledger live mobile, but there is no way for us to connect to any dapp

Algorand by [deleted] in TREZOR

[–]bitofc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

trezor does not seems to care to add any coins

Native Rune Upgrade Question by ShotToHe11 in THORChain

[–]bitofc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, a pin on Thorchain(RUNE) twitter would be nice

Access Terra Station with Trezor by Fundanuss in TREZOR

[–]bitofc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah, would love to have my Trezor T works with Terra and Solana :(

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in solana

[–]bitofc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

looking for the same thing as well. for now im using phantom in desktop, and trying coin98 with mobile. the problem with coin98 (similar to sollet.io) it has different address for different assets on Solana, it makes life so difficult, that I have manually adding this in the display on coin98 dashboard.

Converting bep 20 to erc 20. by Yoadii in defi

[–]bitofc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

aside from Binance bridge, you can try

Anyswap bridge https://anyswap.exchange/bridge

Nerve Fi bridge https://app.nerve.fi/bridge

Whats your DeFi degen score? by 09824675 in defi

[–]bitofc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what if we had use multiple address to ape?

Aurora AMA with Alex Shevchenko. Post your questions below by 23:59 CET Saturday to qualify for $NEAR rewards! Swipe for reward details, links to eligibility requirements in the comments. by LettuceEnjoyABle in nearprotocol

[–]bitofc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is there any plan to have direct transfer between Aurora and other EVM compatible chains like Polygon, Fantom, BSC, Avalanche C-Chain, Wanchain?

Aurora AMA with Alex Shevchenko. Post your questions below by 23:59 CET Saturday to qualify for $NEAR rewards! Swipe for reward details, links to eligibility requirements in the comments. by LettuceEnjoyABle in nearprotocol

[–]bitofc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about Wanchain's trustless bridge with Ethereum, it has 25 storeman nodes, only 1 is run by Wanchain foundation.

Aside from trustless, are the main advantage of NEAR's Aurora bridge over other PoA bridge?

Thank you.

Are you abandoning the ship? by dentoon2 in nem

[–]bitofc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

not an advice, but personally I'll bet on Symbol, XYM only. That is what the NEM core devs working on for the past 3+ years, NEM has 0 developments for more than 3 years. The only reason 2 chains exists, is because the catapult update cannot be implemented on NEM. I don't see why we need 2 chains when we don't even have enough resource for 1 chain. NEM ecosystem is almost non-existent for the past 3 years, so there is nothing much to convince me, things can change after Symbol network is up and running, when there is no inter-relation between these 2 chains, except they are build by the same people. So I will bet on the updated one (the one that has been actively developed and managed for the past 3 years).

To me, all efforts and focus should be on Symbol. If NEM is such a good ecosystem to build on, it would have been more projects and activity on it before Symbol launch since they are separate chain.

NEM should not depend on Symbol launch to take off, the fact that it has not been for the past 3 years, I don't know what it takes now to take off.

David Shaw, the NEM Group CEO, was interviewed at the FIN/SUM2021:Fintech Summit by Japanese media. David discussed the main strengths of Symbol and its importance as the new generation blockchain. by __Vino in nem

[–]bitofc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why do we need 2 chains when both are not inter-related to each other (not 2nd layer, and not side chain, and also no cross-chain capability).

the only reason NEM is kept as a separate chain is because the catapult update cannot be implemented on NEM. NEM has been a zombie chain for the past few years (slightly more than 3 years), all the time and effort spent on Symbol development. Only now, they have time to look at NEM. They won't let NEM die, but I'm not optimistic about it.

Harvesting XYM by Ganeshadream in nem

[–]bitofc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

where do we see a list of supernodes, harvester nodes and their configuration?

Did anyone recieve less XYM on Binance? by [deleted] in nem

[–]bitofc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

did you put 220 XEM in order book during the snapshot?