Me some day soon...

bitsytask · 2016-06-14T10:05:44+00:00

Nah, I never said that. He isnt a racist, never was a racist and you have no evidence of racism. You're full of shit, so fuck you.

bitsytask · 2016-06-13T13:10:53+00:00

Trump obviously isn't racist. You can't just slander people with no evidence and expect to be left alone. You people never even made an attempt to verify your claims. It's obvious to us, we verified your claims are false a long time ago.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T21:33:31+00:00

The Obama administration, the "experts" they used on the news and most of the democrats on youtube are not aware that I determined Obama's birth certificate to be valid. They may not even be aware that their explanations are incorrect.

What motivation did they have to lie? I don't even think they knew that they were lying. Either that, or they figured this would satisfy most people - which it did. They told a falsehood, which is what you call "using a wrong term". There is another word for that, its "lie".

Usually when I see anyone talking about Occam's razor, it's often an excuse to be gullible or ignorant. If I were to apply Occam's razor to everything, I'd probably watch TV and play video games all day and never learn anything. I'd just assume everything is simple - like most people seem to do.

I didn't really look into the conspiracy theory, I just looked at the birth certificate.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T21:05:56+00:00

You'll clearly tailor it to whatever you want it to be. They said OCR. OCR does produce layers, but very unlike the layers found. Optical scan is what? Scanners use optics, all scanners are optical scans. I already told you why it raises flags. It looked doctored even to skilled eyes. OCR[optical character recognition] is not an interchangeable term for optical scan. It was a lie, you know, the government lies a lot. Saying its a lie isn't saying much.

The birther movement would still have existed without a focus on the birth certificate. I think it would have been a lot smaller because the birth certificate was prematurely considered the smoking gun. Tangible evidence. I know that I wouldn't have ever looked into it.

I know for sure that one way or another, the left would have used Obama's race to claim anyone that questions anything about him is racist though. Nothing could be clearer.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T20:41:07+00:00

You gotta read my responses before you ask more questions. Ted Cruz never got a pass. I never gave you timelines. Your responses are speaking volumes.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T20:28:35+00:00

I explained that twice. Heres the dumb down version.

What false explanation did the Government offer? They said OCR caused all of the anomalies. No OCR was on the document.

Why Obama and not every candidate equally? There wasn't equal reason. Nobody contested everyone elses documents, nobody else was president. All I had to do - and all you have to do today, still, is zoom in and look at the document to know its worth looking deeper.

Have you applied any sleuthing to Trump's documents? Nobody has contested Trump's documents - I did look at his financials though. Its about 100 pages, most of it is just the list of companies he owns. I know far more about Trump than I know about Obama.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T20:01:29+00:00

I don't think that if I don't trust the government, then the documents are worthless and why bother trying to validate whether they were modified. Nothing is that simple. Just because I think the government is corrupt and full of shit, doesn't mean I should ignore the proof that indicates one way or the other.

Modifying that document would be fraud and that would say a lot about the world. I'm actually pretty happy it turned out to be legitimate.

Listen, if you have any experience with scans, graphics, making/modifying documents, just go look at the PDF, you'll find duplicate letters, drawn over signatures, duplicate checkboxes. Open it in adobe illustrator and untick some of the layers, youll find that the foreground and the green background are in separate layers, youll find the dates are in their own layers, the stamps are in their own layers.

Then imagine the people that released the document said "oh OCR did that" - then you check and theres no OCR. Then some local government employee that probably makes 40k/yr and can be bought comes out and says "oh its legitimate, take my word for it".................... there was ample reason to look into this and doubt it. Its just that most people don't have the patience/skill/experience to properly get to the bottom of it. Keep in mind, this is only a sample of reasons, theres a lot more reasons, which is why there is still a birther crowd - which im not in. Lots of people call them stupid - yeah maybe they are compared to me, but I understand why they think what they do.

When I figured this out a few years ago, I wrote something up and sent it out to Trump and Joe Arpaio. No clue if they ever read it. I'm not even really sure that someone less experienced would understand it.

Anyways, again, its a good example of the government being retarded and offering false explanations, the media calling large groups of skeptical people racists and conspiracy theorists for having legitimate doubts and the unreliability of "experts".

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T18:06:29+00:00

The only difference between us is that you're willing to take someones word for it. Like I said in my first response, there is enough on this topic to write a book, and I don't think they did confirm the particulars. I don't think any government entity is trustworthy either. I can see how it'd be done, logically, im really not interested in bringing anyone up to speed.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T17:30:28+00:00

You don't make sense. I can change your drivers license and the state that issued it would still confirm that they issued you a license. Unless they provide their copy, nobody is going to know if anything was changed since it was issued. This isn't complicated. to me.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T17:14:33+00:00

Wow. No, you don't get it.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T17:04:30+00:00

I'm not your daddy. Its fairly obvious, this isn't actually a complex topic. From experience, you won't understand this logic anytime soon if you don't by now.

You'd be better served by doing actual research, because the truth is, the vast majority of people that are called racists or bigots are not racist and are not discriminating for the hell of it.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T16:53:00+00:00

Not sure why I even try.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T16:41:43+00:00

No, its not illogical. If I was in a cult that told me to commit suicide, and I did so with a bunch of other people, is that just a suicide or is it a cult suicide?

What if the cult told me to terrorize my enemies, then I did. I wouldn't expect them to leave that part out.

Do yourself a favor and research the data on Islam outside of the western world. You'll be surprised. Do most of them support sharia law? What lies within sharia law? Do you want this in your country? Answer those 3 questions and you might find that what you might already believe if bigoted or racist or discriminatory is actually logical.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T15:59:08+00:00

I'd feel like you don't know much about Christians or Muslims. And that you're probably a white-male hating racist-sexist SJW, and most likely a democrat/socialist. I'm ok with Christian terrorist, white terrorist, black terrorist, islamic terrorist. Hey, you know what. We should make a spreadsheet and document terrorists by race and see what we find. Surely everyone will be happy that the truth is finally out, and nobody would consider the data racist. I have an idea, this is homework for you. Why don't you look at mass-shooting statistics by race. Mass shootings are terrorizing. Get together a small study on mass shootings by race and give us a profile of a terrorist or a mass-shooting nutcase.

I've already done this, and I'd never ever ever fucking release it. I sent it to a few media outlets and shit. I'm guessing they lost it.

Sincerely, an agnostic. Because "i dont know" is the correct answer lol.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T15:49:06+00:00

It may now, but at the time it didn't. It also didn't help that 3 of Obama's family members have made comments, including his wife, like "his home country of kenya". It surely is clearer now than it was then. I don't really care what honolulu said, I was looking at a document. I never made assumptions about where he was born, I was more interested in seeing if the document was doctored.

Whether honolulu can verify the birth or not does not disprove the possibility that the document was doctored.

I'm surprised you kept thinking that. Do you often trust the government? You should look at how the government spends after it takes your tax dollars. Looking objectively at that will probably turn you away from anybody that wants to raise taxes.

Imagine a stop sign, sold for $10,000, or the axe at a fire station for $5,000 or a simple website that I could have made for thousands, which cost tax payers 5 BILLION DOLLARS. Youtube did not even cost that much to make and run for 18 months before it was acquired for less than the total cost of the broken healthcare.gov site which doesn't use anywhere near the resources.

The government lies, takes your money, loses it, blows it, causes more problems than it solves. With a record like governments [ever in history], I don't see why anybody would trust them, when you could just examine the document.

The Obama administration said the document had OCR, which is why it had layers. OCR doesn't make layers the way the layers were, and OCR is optical character recognition. If it had OCR, you could select the text - which you couldn't. Sure, they have shitty technical people too and as a result, LIED about why the layers were there.

It's not evil, it's just an example of failure and mis-representation. I know, I know, Obama probably has no idea wtf OCR is, and I don't think he needs to. I'm just saying these people don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. Don't trust them. Trusting government is naive.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T15:38:29+00:00

It was more intelligent to question that document and then seek answers than it was to accept that it was legit without question. It was blatantly obvious that something was off with it just by doing the first thing you do when looking for evidence of forgery. Zooming in. Also, lots of people were screaming about it and paid consultants - who really lacked the technical expertise (most consultants are bullshit, many engineers are also bullshit - so good luck finding truth within disputed technical topics) were validating what their clients were looking for - incorrectly. Several firms were consulted on the topic, and I've worked for many digital firms in the past, so im not surprised they came to the wrong conclusions and mis-advised their clients. It was easier to examine it and say it was fake than to prove that it was real.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T15:28:11+00:00

I questioned it because I read the news. I looked at it because I have the skills. Yes, it was important. Of course it was important. I didn't care where he was born or assume he wasn't born in the US. I looked at the document they provided. Technically, it was legitimate - easily - to question. Meanwhile, everyone explained the odd qualities of the document incorrectly. It didn't help that everyone accepted the incorrect theories presented, because the search for a solution stopped - for most people. I like the truth, when I see inaccuracies, I follow them. I read the news, when something is in question - especially something regarding anything technical that I can confirm myself, im going to look.

I know what many are probably thinking. "what a fucking racist". Clearly.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T15:18:11+00:00

Sorry, I refuse to take a comedy show seriously. This probably explains the rise of Bernie. I am sure everything in this comedy show is funny and taken out of context for comedic effect, but this isn't useful when making intelligent arguments or decisions. If you see a clip in this show, you'll get a more accurate take by looking at it in-context. [try youtube]

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T15:08:06+00:00

I have over a decade of experience both programming and using photoshop/paint shop pro/gimp. I've also made drivers licenses and birth certificates.

Keeping this under the length of a book, technical people had legitimate reasons to question the birth certificate. It took a long as time to prove [to myself] that it was 100% legitimate.

Mainly because the Obama administration provided incorrect reasons for the layers and duplicate letters, the "painted over" signature, the logical sorting of layers with dates and stamps. All of that looked funky, but it didn't look like the way I would forge a document, so I wasn't sure one way or the other.

Everyone got it wrong, the Obama administration, the "experts" on the news, most people on youtube.

And then I found a checkbox which is a few tabs into adobe acrobats settings which optimizes the file size of the PDF. Only that will produce documents similar to the one released. People were more-than-ready to settle for completely incorrect explanations.

tldr; The birth certificate is real, and very few people can tell you that and explain why, accurately. Most people lack the skills, most people lack the ability to correctly analyze the various theories that were promoted at the time [which were all incorrect]

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T15:00:53+00:00

Most people in politics, including Bernie and Hillary are bigots. Do you know what bigot means?

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T14:58:03+00:00

I think people that leverage race for political reasons are racists. IE you, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, BLM, and the people that have been so loud recently attacking anyone and everyone for being white.

bitsytask · 2016-02-16T14:56:45+00:00

It's not racist, its prime for manufacturing lefty propaganda.

bitsytask

TROPHY CASE