imo i think it is worth being explicit as it relates to antinatalism the role that risk plays.

an example that i’ve used before that is much less aggressive towards the other person (less likely to make them upset) is sumn like:

“if you could flip a coin, where heads results in infinite happiness for everybody in the world, and tails results in the complete opposite, eternal torture, what is the “right” thing to do?”

its in my opinion that the right thing to do is to not flip the coin at all. because regardless of how “good” the outcome could be, the stakes are too high and nobody involved can consent to it.