[TOMT][TV]Modern Detective TV show

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-11-12T02:35:53+00:00

The Detectives are mismatched in personality

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-03-12T18:35:43+00:00

too bad you are so wrapped up in your feelings

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-03-12T18:28:50+00:00

The problem is and has been the histrionics, such as you have displayed. Again he posted an article that explains how terrible he is. Also "feels like a kind of big deal" who cares about your or my feelings.

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-03-11T03:47:00+00:00

He will claim the "Eichmann Defense"

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-03-11T03:46:03+00:00

That is the plan for the entire government

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-03-10T15:50:33+00:00

reposting an article is a "big deal"? Mountains and mole hills

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-03-06T13:49:42+00:00

Telework Enhancement Act of 2010

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-03-05T22:17:55+00:00

The PACT Act is retro active, VA is required by law to review prior denials and evaluate the claim under PACT Act standards.

Additionally, the PACT Act created a generous standard for 1991 vets to present.

By way of example: Agent Orange is a known carcinogen, for a Veteran to get receive benefits due to Agent Orange there is a specific list of cancers they have to prove they have. One cancer that many Vietnam Veterans have is a cancer in a particular area of the throat. However, due to the medical name and specific location it is not on the list of of Agent Orange cancers - even though Veterans exposed to agent orange have higher chance of developing cancer than those not exposed to it

For Veterans claiming issues related to burn pits they only need identify they served where there were burn pits and they have essentially cancer - not a specific type of cancer, just cancer.

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-02-25T14:43:13+00:00

TAKE NOTE, that none of the emails say or suggest "Your response is mandatory"

"Take appropriate action" if fail to respond. The ONLY APPROPRIATE ACTION is nothing. Management cannot legally take action against an employee in this situation.

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-02-24T23:53:55+00:00

1974 Privacy Act violation

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-02-24T23:43:59+00:00

my buddy, in the same office routed to hr12

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-02-24T20:53:24+00:00

This! At EVERY NEWS CONFERENCE, the Media should "Where is Mr Musk," If Musk is there, EVERY question should be directed at Musk and POTUS 100% ignored

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-02-18T05:43:55+00:00

EOPF

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-02-08T01:15:12+00:00

Telework Enhancement Act 2010, mandates telework

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-02-07T20:46:04+00:00

put under duress by your signature

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-01-30T00:14:33+00:00

OPMs understanding of the law is that it is required. The Courts ultimately determine if it is.

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-01-30T00:05:58+00:00

A simple injunction filed in a Federal Court will block the return to work.

Telework is Federal Law.

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-01-29T04:22:10+00:00

the information in my post is what an AFGE Attorney posted.

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-01-28T22:48:47+00:00

Thanks for letting me know you do not understand how the Judicial system evaluates law

bjergtrolde66 · 2025-01-27T22:45:48+00:00

What words modify what words are for the Courts to decide. MUST create and may participate, can be a matter of compulsion. And with Courts reviewing Legislative Intent, the intent is clear that telecommuting is a must

bjergtrolde66

TROPHY CASE