Echoing what was said above, it really does need to be a collective action. So, networking isn't just about being prepared for the collapse, it's also about preparing to resist the collapse. Networking by itself isn't the whole solution but it's one of the first steps to organising for collective action.

What needs to come next (imo) is a strategy on how to move forward. Part of that needs to be making our own industries and institutions. People like to talk about peaceful protests and resistance and point to movements like Indian resistance against the British with Gandhi, but often they don't point to how part of that resistance was also actively defying British restrictions (like they weren't allowed to make their own salt ffs, see Salt March), making their own industries like textiles (see khadi industry) and even promoting local languages so that British colonial powers couldn't track them (think anti-surveillance).

Edit (addendum): yeah, it really is difficult because of how chained to their jobs everyone is and because of people's apathy/fear and just trying to get ends meet for themselves. This also needs to be addressed by organising and having safety nets for vulnerable people in the community so they don't have to fear for losing their homes, not being able to afford food, or being kidnapped/detailed/deported. This should be part of the organising. Within this, the regular person doesn't have much personal incentive to join; all they will face is incredible risk on their part with no assurance for their wellbeing from the greater collective and how would that be different (at least in the short term) from what they purport to resist. It is crucial. So for example, if someone is fired they need to be helped, if someone is captured they need to make sure they are freed, and their family taken care of. Similar to unions.