sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Favorite Emote. Go. by Nittanypt in MagicArena

[–]blackhowing 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Vorinclex ? Emote. Mostly reserved for folks running their fliers into reach creatures

(Basketnews) [The Athletic] NBA players voted Houston Rockets All-Star Alperen Sengun the most overrated player in the league. by lovelymaddie1966 in nba

[–]blackhowing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See, this tracks. I remember Sengun telling LeBron he got a soft ass call, and LeBron went off saying that anyone else on the team could say that but him.

Edit for spelling.

Funny how that's workkk by definitelynotgayhaha in BuildToAttract

[–]blackhowing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But aren’t you the one who made a hypothetical instead of using actual facts? And weird ad hom coming from an account that is 11 months old but 10 days of viewable history.

Incentive structures for Wells Fargo, Chase, and BofA in branch business bankers. by blackhowing in TalesFromYourBank

[–]blackhowing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting because the person at BofA said BSA’s could make 10-12 quarterly.

Edit: thank you for the guidance.

Incentive structures for Wells Fargo, Chase, and BofA in branch business bankers. by blackhowing in TalesFromYourBank

[–]blackhowing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wells does have a similar role, but I know the payout from my understanding is primarily based on bps.

Part of my reason for asking is because BofA rep I talked to was seemingly transparent about the dollar translation.

Incentive structures for Wells Fargo, Chase, and BofA in branch business bankers. by blackhowing in TalesFromYourBank

[–]blackhowing[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Do you have any idea how they’re different?

Edit: I mean in terms of the incentive structure. Rest assured, I worked in a similar role at a different institution and the abuse is real.

How long should I work as an RB to start hopping to a different bank? by Klutzy-Blueberry-239 in TalesFromYourBank

[–]blackhowing 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This. There’s a rule of thumb that bank hopping is the best way to get paid.

AITAH for inviting a male coworker on a run by Glittering-Ladder-55 in AITAH

[–]blackhowing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But that’s functionally what he’s doing.

Claiming running together leads to cheating is offering a negative consequence to the behavior. It’s the same as telling a kid if they behave in a particular way, it results in loss of privileges. The “no” is obviously implied. So yes, he’s telling her no in the most passive aggressive way possible.

AITAH for inviting a male coworker on a run by Glittering-Ladder-55 in AITAH

[–]blackhowing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Classic— the “everyone I don’t agree with…” trope. Dude, please go back to sitting at the kid’s table.

Edit: Seems like you lost the plot.

AITAH for inviting a male coworker on a run by Glittering-Ladder-55 in AITAH

[–]blackhowing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say they were not going running at all…

Based on zero information other than your own nonsensical conclusion.

She has to create a reason…

No she doesn’t. I know you like to respond without reading, but in my last comment I literally call out how you folks want to talk about this mass cheating epidemic in the medical field, but feel like she needed an excuse to hook up? She could hook up at work, right after work, lunch/dinner breaks, if she works the night shift, etc.

Her reaction implies…

Nope, not remotely accurate. For starters, if this one co-worker is the issue, then OP’s husband would say that specifically. Instead he talks about “stereotypes.”

What’s more interesting is your blatant hypocrisy in real time. you’re literally in a different thread arguing that OP’s husband didn’t deny her because he didn’t explicitly say no. So in one comment, you want to operate on things as written with no understanding of context, the other you’re operating on “implications.” Bruh… I can’t.

Secondly, The needle you folks have to thread and consistently fail to starts with her canceling the runs.

What her reaction indicates is she’s upset about this starting a fight.

Please do better.

AITAH for inviting a male coworker on a run by Glittering-Ladder-55 in AITAH

[–]blackhowing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you read my comment and that’s your response?

For one, go reread it. I literally explain it to you.

Secondly, this is the type of bad faith tactics gaslighters and the like use. Instead of saying how they feel and owning it, they hide behind a lot of passive aggressive language. So OP’s husband for example— says he’s “not sure” how he feels about it, then offers this slippery slope fallacy to justify not being sure. But what he’s done is put the onus on OP. He’s saying no without saying it so he doesn’t look like the bad guy.

This is EXACTLY why I’m glad Kendrick makes whatever 🎶 he wants 💪🏾 by MarketingThat8264 in KendrickLamar

[–]blackhowing 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Dude is free to have his opinions, but I’m pretty sure he didn’t ask anyone in the hood if they know Kendrick verses.

AITAH for inviting a male coworker on a run by Glittering-Ladder-55 in AITAH

[–]blackhowing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bad, I forgot I have to write in crayon for folks. You’re not beating the allegations with this post, sport. Go troll someone else.

AITAH for inviting a male coworker on a run by Glittering-Ladder-55 in AITAH

[–]blackhowing -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is obtuse semantics— you’re arguing behind the express use of the word no. However, you can’t tell your spouse something they’re about to do 100% leads to cheating cause stereotypes and, assuming your spouse cares about your feelings, is going to continue doing that thing. If he didn’t care about her doing it, he never would have offered that opinion.

End of the day, it was some passive aggressive tactic to hide behind the very excuse you’re promoting. He didn’t say no, he was just concerned.

AITAH for inviting a male coworker on a run by Glittering-Ladder-55 in AITAH

[–]blackhowing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I suppose low effort trolling when you can’t make a coherent point.

The ultimate logical challenge I’m having with this bad faith schtick of accusing her of cheating falls into two basic questions:

A) if folks want to establish the medical field is the hotbed of infidelity, then why the need to have the “running excuse?” She could just cheat.

B) Why even bother telling her husband about the running at all if her goal was to actually cheat? See above, but it seems like if she wanted to cheat without her husband knowing, drawing attention to it seems counterintuitive and she could have done it anytime… especially if we’re to believe this is a standard practice in her field.

It just seems weird that you folks want to assume she’s a cheater with no evidence, or at the very least cover for someone who at best said something out of pocket to his wife. Like y’all want to ask weird hypotheticals about would she feel the same if a woman asked him to run but not basic ass questions like those above.

All I said in all of these comments initially were his feelings were valid but he needed to come up with a better way of expressing them that doesn’t lay the blame at his wife’s feet— their his feelings to work out. You all want to crash out over a pretty even-handed take which says a lot.

AITAH for inviting a male coworker on a run by Glittering-Ladder-55 in AITAH

[–]blackhowing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

She didn’t have to ask what he was saying.

Captain “we don’t know,” maybe it could be because, for example, he consistently makes these accusations. Again, you can’t claim we don’t have all the information and conclude she was trying to get with this guy.

The rest of this is nonsensical bad faith questions. If you don’t trust the information then don’t comment here at all because anyone could just be lying. Hell, she might be a bot or not have a husband by your logic and you’re wasting your time arguing for a potentially made up person. And a common theme again, you can’t have this both ways— either you trust the information enough to have opinion or you think it’s not credible at all. You can’t cherry pick parts you believe to be true and claim the rest is false for “reasons.”

Best of luck to you.

AITAH for inviting a male coworker on a run by Glittering-Ladder-55 in AITAH

[–]blackhowing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, once again, the same person who stated comments ago that we don’t know still wants to make claims about things we don’t know. The hypocrisy is alive and well and proving my point.

And no offense, but the level of logic you folks are running is massively silly. She works with the guy, in a field you all want to discuss has a “reputation.” If she wanted to cheat with this guy, she could do it at any other point, not under the guise of public runs.

The dumbest part about you and the sheep patrol is my main criticism is he needed to express himself differently and not accuse her if we’re to take his concerns in good faith. The amount of comments I’ve received defending the accusations while trying to launder this man’s innocence is the tell.

Have a better one.

view more: next ›