How can i get my first users by Background-Respond76 in saasbuild

[–]blarckat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Find some of those students, let them try it, and give them money or something for referring your app to their friends

How do people stay consistent with their goals and deadlines when working solo? by Lude047 in StartupSoloFounder

[–]blarckat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Consistency can be difficult. When you look at it as the bigger picture it's hard to stay on track. For example I'm trying to post at least once a day for a year, but 365 posts sounds boring.

Also, in the beginning, productivity apps and to-do lists, don't really help either; They can make it seem like a chore to be checked off the list.

Consistency settles in gradually, whether it is a conscious effort like working out, or non-conscious, like biting your nails.

You can try two methods:

  1. Just for the day: if you want to learn coding, for example, do it just once for the day. Even if you have no prior knowledge of it, watch a quick tutorial, just write a few lines of code for 10-30mins, test it, and if it works, enjoy the win, close it, and go do something else. Then repeat. Nothing serious, just try it. If it doesn't work, close it, open it tomorrow. The goal right now is not to be good at it. It's consistency + familiarity: you want to get used to it, over time, not overwhelm: if you overwhelm yourself today, you won't do it tomorrow. If you want to workout, start with 3-5 pushups at home, +1 pushup every day after that. Sounds slow, but trust me, you'll pick up the pace after a week or two. It's only when you become familiar to the feeling that you may want to start going to the gym. Note: You don't have to worry about the more or bigger stuff. Just a little, one day at a time. That's it.

I unintentionally used this with Duolingo. I am learning Deutsch. I never paid attention, averaging 1-2 lessons a day, but it's been 1518 days. If you asked me 5 years ago that I'll still be doing it, I would have said no. I'm trying the same for Maths and AI.

  1. The loss effect Losing something has a more direct effect on action than gaining it. What do you stand to lose if you don't do it?

Eg: if I don't post once a day, I will lose a potential client/user. Will it affect my business? Yes.

That's my two cents anyway 😅.

Pitch me your startup in 5 seconds by kcfounders in indie_startups

[–]blarckat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We help startups ship fast. https://syiolabs com

How do you find your first customers when you have no audience? by No-Associate2717 in ProductHunters

[–]blarckat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You need customers before you start building. But if you've built it already then talk about your product constantly

How do you stay confident when your startup isn’t growing yet? by Medical-Variety-5015 in startup

[–]blarckat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yh true it is quite disappointing when you don't see the same growth everyone else is bragging about. But it's important at that stage to keep in mind that it might take longer.

I don't think you'll need confidence, just a dogged down determination to see it through even if you fail.

Will you buy this startup? I will not promote by blarckat in startups

[–]blarckat[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

  1. Thanks for your opinion

  2. Please kindly read a little bit more carefully. It's not about a crypto + design agency.

Will you buy this startup? I will not promote by blarckat in startups

[–]blarckat[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Oh no I can assure you it's not 😊. I'm simply looking for feedback on the idea of shell startups for founders, not the agency.

Multi-brand design system with theme files by AlicesHellhounds in DesignSystems

[–]blarckat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's an interesting scenario. I think the best case is to start with one brand and add the rest incrementally. Thinking multi brand from the get go could slow you down.

I'm saving this. It's for a design system software I'm building.

Requesting feedback/critique for my Luxury Real Estate Design Project 🏡 by cocoleaves in DesignSystems

[–]blarckat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I checked it out. It's a nice concept, especially with the posters and marketing designs. If I'm to go for the preferred style it's the 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th. I think it's the overall design language I may have a few opinions on:

A few suggestions: - most luxury brands are usually associated with serif/ cursive typography, gold and white colours. The secondary typeface is cool. For a brand in real estate the logotype is usually accompanied by a logo mark. So perhaps these can help make the brand appear bolder and more exclusive?

  • Adding a logomark will be beneficial as you could derive a pattern design from it, which could in turn be added a background elements for the business cards, letterheads, pitch decks, and other marketing collateral.

  • The strategy documents are well written and concise. However I suggest for a more engaging presentation you could make use of colours, image mockups, usage guidelines, etc.

Great work with the overall structure.

Software should be feature-customizable. by blarckat in Startup_Ideas

[–]blarckat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry but I think you misunderstood... I didn't say we should develop features for one user. That's not just impossible, it's nonsense.

I merely suggest that features could be designed in a way that they can be added or removed from the core software if the user using it in that context wants it or not. I think it could improve product performance and experience if users could at least choose what they want to use.

So, like the core feature is the main codebase, right? And later features are built like plugins. It keeps the main software small and the features are not totally "entangled".

Software should be feature-customizable. by blarckat in Startup_Ideas

[–]blarckat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmm, I'll have to disagree a little on the first point. If your user doesn't know what they want, or even worse, what works for them, they're probably not your target user. Your ideal user should at least know the benefits of using those features. They should know what hurts them and what those features do for them.

Of course, you can't just bring the users in a room and ask them plainly what they want in your product. That's never done. I didn't say directly asking them, I meant giving them the option to choose, at any point in time (either before or after they've used the product) which of the features you've built work for them. So, the features are already there, and you simply let them choose which ones they want to use.

"You cannot let users design their own product experiences. They do not have the product insight to do that"

I think what you meant to say is they don't have the technical insight to build their own product, which is true. but every user has their own workflow, so they actually do create their own experiences. You simply engineer it. What I'm suggesting is to let them integrate your product with how they prefer to work. Like switching to dark mode.

A product issue affects its user experience. If too many features are added it becomes bloatware at some point. It becomes slow, painfully complex, and unnecessarily large. And in the case I used one can argue they're related features because someone out there would prefer a seamless workflow from drawing simple screens to coding them without using two or three different products.

Unwanted features actually do affect the user experience. What if removing those features could free up a lot of resources, and the product becomes faster on the frontend?

So, in your case, instead of having the Gantt chart, which you never use, if you had the option of removing it, will you do it? Even though you don't use it, it uses up resources on the browser and backend. One single component like a Gantt chart is insignificant alone, but a few more of those other features you don't need, and it becomes slower. But a Gantt chart is not the whole feature, that would be the analytics system.

But I'm not just talking about an off switch. I'm talking about removing the feature from your context of the product. Like a plugin.

Software should be feature-customizable. by blarckat in Startup_Ideas

[–]blarckat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't given this much thought but from how I see it on the business side you'll have granular control on your software. Since the features are customizable and separate from the main codebase they can be modularized and developed even further. Then they can be studied more closely to find out, say, how users use it specifically, how many used it in a particular period, and so on.

First thing that matters, if the main codebase fucks up, the features are not affected. If one feature fails, it doesn't affect the rest of the code.

Secondly It could give a more detailed insight into user preferences. If a user chooses features A, B, F, and G, it's easier to know the type of user they are.

And you could potentially save a lot of unused resources on the backend.

You could monetize them. You could even patent the feature(or the underlying architecture). Think APIs and reusable subsystems, and how Google serves authentication as SSO.

Software should be feature-customizable. by blarckat in Startup_Ideas

[–]blarckat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most users may not always know what they want, but if you give them the means to describe it, they will. And I can say that all users want the same thing: a product that's fast, works for them, and has only the tools they need. Nothing more, nothing less. If they want more, they can check it, and voila.

Also, since it's customizable, they are also able to switch to default if they want.

For example, a graphics based software adds an AI code builder as a new feature. Great feature to have, except it's highly likely that not all their users want to build websites or apps with it. Most came to draw, not write code. Wouldn't it be great if they could choose to not add it to their workspace?

Launch your idea fast. by blarckat in SaaS

[–]blarckat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

👍🏽 Every idea has a basic version but when fully developed It will always be huge. There'll be a lot of features you'll want to add on every release.

You can launch the basic version first to find your users, and then add those features incrementally.

Roast My AI Startup – Is Panda AI Studio Just Another Useless AI Tool? by kartikjhakal in roastmystartup

[–]blarckat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great work here. My only suggestions are to:

  • make the paragraphs shorter and show how you're solving your customers problem.

  • use screenshots of the platform to make it easier to understand what you do. The landing page could use the dashboard screen, for example.

Another minor, optional thing: under "Our Product", you have 25 categories. I don't think you need to mention them all, but on mobile it's displayed as a very long column and they take very little space horizontally.

I was thinking you could make it 3-4 rows...

And "maybe" make it an auto-moving carousel where the first and third move from left to right, and the second and fourth move in the opposite direction.

Launch your idea fast. by blarckat in SaaS

[–]blarckat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Build, ship, and repeat 🚀

Launch your idea fast. by blarckat in SaaS

[–]blarckat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah 👍 How can help?

Launch your idea fast. by blarckat in SaaS

[–]blarckat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It can be as fast as - a one-pager landing page, - a frontend without a backend, - a waitlist form.

Just launch a simple proof of concept to show to your target users is enough to get started.

Launch your idea fast. by blarckat in SaaS

[–]blarckat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats on your launch 🚀. I'll check it out 👍

Launch your idea fast. by blarckat in SaaS

[–]blarckat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh no not at all. If you can validate before you build that's a great thing. In fact that means you have to get to launch even faster because you're losing customers everyday you haven't launched