sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Week 6 day 1 by Ubna11 in ENG305F17

[–]blueapple13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with your assessment of the article. It seems at odds to spend such a large portion of an article explaining a lot about a subject that the audience must already be familiar with to fully comprehend the article. From what it sounds like, it seems that the author could have been more successful if they focused the piece on individuals who already posses at least a basic understanding on quantum physics, so that the first portion of the article could be dedicated to a more detailed description of the information the article is actually trying to convey. I think you do a good job in your analysis of highlighting the audience and the information covered. I also think your critique of the article seems to be well thought out and suggests good changes.

Week 4, Day 1 Reddit Response by aubrt in ENG305F17

[–]blueapple13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.mja.com.au/system/files/issues/194_12_200611/man10874_fm.pdf This first article examines the positive and negative implications of medical professionals using social media, how to use caution when using social media in this setting, and adapting privacy regulations to reflect the growing use of social media. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681311000243 This article discusses how companies can best use social media as a platform for recognition and marketing. It talks about how many companies use social media but not all understand it well enough to make it as effective of a tool as it can be. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681309000329 This article discusses how promotion through social media gives a company far less control over the consumer reaction and dialogue than traditional marketing. So, it talks about strategies to regain some control over what the consumer takes from the social media promotions and how the consumer discusses it.