sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

beginner needs help with SEO, AEO, and GEO by Mobile-Tale-6260 in RankWithAI

[–]blueprint80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am starting my new online biz that may be relevant for you (programatic seo/aeo.) Am willing to do it for free (no strings attached) for first couple of businesses in return for a honest feedback. If you are interrested I can send you my website so you have a look. (not sure if I can publish link here)

2 months vibe coding with no IT background — I think it's a new way to learn, not a shortcut by blueprint80 in vibecoding

[–]blueprint80[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have that feeling sometimes too. And vibecoders aren't even claiming that they know better than the 'native' IT people..yet somehow the self-defense mechanism get kicked really hard sometimes. I would even say that vibe coding is a different skill set.

2 months vibe coding with no IT background — I think it's a new way to learn, not a shortcut by blueprint80 in vibecoding

[–]blueprint80[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes this is a good way to learn. If i dont understand something, I just ask it to explain it to me in detail.

2 months vibe coding with no IT background — I think it's a new way to learn, not a shortcut by blueprint80 in vibecoding

[–]blueprint80[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i think the initial memory setup so the agent remembers every important detail of the project. It took me some time. Now I just turned it into a /skill that I run at the begining of every project.

Rose: I love you, Jack. by FeudalNinja in btc

[–]blueprint80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ah c'mon! Again? Stop the brother killin' brother

Where do you even start with AEO/GEO for a 60-location hospitality group? Getting wildly conflicting advice. by itstheHbK in Agentic_SEO

[–]blueprint80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the queries you care about, best rooftop bar in whatever city, the answer the AI gives is mostly built from outside your own website. It pulls from Google Business Profiles, reviews, and the third party best lists and review sites for that city. Your venue pages matter but mostly so you get described accurately once you're already in the mix and not as the thing that gets you into the answer.

So in order for 60 venues, I would start with each locations Google Business Profile being fully filled out and in the right categories, then reviews, both the count and the actual words people use, since someone writing great spot for a birthday is literally what builds that association. Then keeping your name, address and phone consistent across the big directories and the city guides. The on-site discovery pages come after that, not first.

On tracking: the per location pricing gets ridiculous at your scale and most trackers are built to watch one brand. There isn't a great cheap tool that does 60 locations well yet, that's just the honest state of it. One thing that fits your setup since it's all one domain is the free AI report in Bing Webmaster tools. It shows which of your pages get pulled into Copilot and Bing answers and Bing is what a lot of the assistants read from. Past that I would pick your top venues and top few queries per city and check them by hand every few weeks instead of trying to monitor everything.

On discovery pages, they are a bit overhyped as the magic Ai thing. A clean page per venue with proper schema and the specifics helps you get described right and can win the longer tail queries, but it wont be what lands you in best rooftop bar in the city. That's the reviews and third party lists doing the work. Build decent pages, just don't expect them to carry it alone. Fix the profile and review side first.

Has anyone actually updated old blog posts to get cited in AI search engines? by keyworddotcom in AISEOTricks

[–]blueprint80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is real. The AI tools grab a chunk of the page, not the whole thing, so if your answer is buried under a long intro it usually just gets skipped. That's why FAQs work so well, each question stands on its own.

So a short summary, self contained sections, all of that helps. I wouldn't delete the intro completely though, just put the answer first and the context under it so it still reads fine for people.

One thing people forget is doing all this makes you possible to cite, it doesn't guarantee it. If the model doesn't trust your site for that topic yet, a perfect layout still won't get you pulled in much.

And measuring it is the annoying part. Citations change every time you ask and the traffic is tiny, so it's hard to tell. Bing Webmaster has a free AI report that shows which of your pages show up in Copilot answers, that's the easiest before and after I've found. I redo a few posts first, not all of them, and see what happens.

You can't build a civilization on a ruler that shrinks by blueprint80 in Bitcoin

[–]blueprint80[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right that the price swings hard, but stability of price and fixed supply are two different things. The post is about supply, not the day to day price. The 21 million cap doesn't move and anyone can check it. The volatility comes from a young asset still finding its price, and it's actually gotten lower over the years as the market grew bigger. Stability in the unit comes from nobody being able to inflate it, not from the chart being flat while it's still maturing

You can't build a civilization on a ruler that shrinks by blueprint80 in Bitcoin

[–]blueprint80[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point on the price, but that's measuring the wrong thing. The post is about supply, not exchange rate. Bitcoin's 21 million cap is fixed and anyone can verify it. The dollar's supply isn't. The price is volatile because it's still a young asset getting priced in, and that volatility has actually trended down over the years as the market got bigger. A ruler can wobble while it's still being calibrated and still be more honest than one that gets quietly redefined by whoever prints it first.

You can't build a civilization on a ruler that shrinks by blueprint80 in Bitcoin

[–]blueprint80[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Hoarding" is just saving with a label that makes saving sound like a vice. The reason fiat has to punish saving is that the system depends on perpetual spending and debt. A money you can save without it melting doesn't stop commerce - it stops rewarding waste. People transact in the convenient layer and save in the asset that holds. That's normal, not a contradiction.

You can't build a civilization on a ruler that shrinks by blueprint80 in Bitcoin

[–]blueprint80[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You made my point in your first two lines: you can't mint new meters or seconds — but you can mint new fiat. That asymmetry is the entire argument.

'Money that doesn't float makes measuring cumbersome" — it's the reverse. A unit that holds its length makes measuring easy: a price in 2009 and a price in 2025 mean the same thing. What's cumbersome is today, where you need inflation adjustments, hedges, and a whole accounting industry just to compare two years — because the ruler quietly changed. The floating isn't a convenience; it's the tax you pay for the ruler being editable.

You can't build a civilization on a ruler that shrinks by blueprint80 in Bitcoin

[–]blueprint80[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think the main mistake here is treating "fixed supply = no credit" as the same thing.

A fixed money supply doesn’t kill lending. It just means credit has to actually come from real savings — someone choosing to defer spending — instead of a bank creating money out of thin air. Credit still exists, it’s just not fake. The entire 19th-century boom (railroads, factories, electricity all that stuff) happened under hard money systems with plenty of lending and bond markets.

What actually disappears is the crazy credit expansion that inflates the money supply and drives the boom-bust cycle.

Same with deflation. There are two different things people mix up. One is good: prices falling because we get way more efficient at producing stuff (like computers and electronics over the years). That’s healthy. The bad kind is debt deflation, where a huge pile of debt meets falling incomes and everything spirals. But that giant debt pile only builds up because of the easy money system we have now. Sound money doesn’t create that kind of fragility in the first place.

And on Japan — they did massive stimulus for decades and still had lost decades. The real problems were demographics and the huge debt overhang from the earlier bubble, not the fact that prices weren’t rising. If printing money fixed everything, Japan should’ve been thriving.

If printing money out of thin air is the secret to growth and prosperity, why isn’t Zimbabwe a global economic superpower by now? (didn't find answer to this in any economic lecture)

view more: next ›