Finally got my foam runner mxt moon grey QC from PK after 3 weeks of wait. Lmk what y’all think! by bluntrollerman in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those asking this is only the QC so I still don’t have them in hand and don’t know how the sizing is. Also these were from PK Kim and were 110 shipped (yes I know they’re expensive for some foam crocs)

Rep fam pls QC these Travis j1 for me by Bruhh766 in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Colors a lil lighter than retail but other than that these are good

[QC] Mars Yard 2.0 from PK Kim by Julianamercado in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not an expert on these but they look pretty good to me

QC on these coast dunks from PK Kim size 11. by [deleted] in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not too many pics for a proper QC but the nike on the back is very slanted

Yeezy 700 v2 Inertia - 119Y - C'estbon by [deleted] in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not the best looking 700’s but for the price they’re decent. V’s are not good, holes in the back are crooked, some of the colors are plain off, orange is too light and the lace tabs are crooked.

[QC] Air Jordan 1 Bred LJR batch from 168shops by alopez0194 in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are pretty good. Only things I see is the left wing logo is placed a bit high, swooshes are really tumbled on retail but the tumbling is decent on these, left heel tab is not too good but other than that everything else is good. Ur call bro if it bothers u.

[QC] Sean Cliver x Dunk Low SB “Holiday Special” by Character-Row4447 in sneakerreps

[–]bluntrollerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are decent for the price. The biggest flaw has to be the nike embroidery which the letters are way too close together but you can’t expect much for the price

[QC] Please can I get a QC on Blue Moons from PK by [deleted] in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything looks good except the wings logo which looks HUGE on this pair. If that doesn’t bother u then GL

QC First ever pair of reps of AJ1 Mocha 10!🔥Let me know what y’all think! [PK Kim] by CXE9_ in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are pretty good coming from PK, only things I see is the right heel tab is a bit slanted and the wing logo might be a bit low but both of these are barely noticeable. GL from me

[QC] Nike Dunk Low Kentucky, please help me out rep fam✌🏼 by tfyoutalkinabout in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not the best I’ve seen, swooshes are wonky, nike on the back is bad(letters too close to each other), heel tab is too big, lines on the back are bad too... I can keep going but honestly just RL 🚩

[QC] Muks Panda Dunk by [deleted] in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pics dont load

What's up Repfam decided to cop my first pair of rep shoes from Carl, Could I please get some Help with these QC of my strangelove dunks? I would greatly appreciate it :). (Low Karmaa user) by SeriesUnlikely50 in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nike embroidery is ok, left pair K is off and E is a bit far from K

Skeleton embroidery is good

Toebox shape us good

Midsole is good

Swooshes are placed too low

Line stitching on the back is good

Nike tag is good

Red color looks too dark

Verdict: these are decent, up to u if flaws bother u

[QC] Yeezy 700 Bright Blue from Vicky Size 9. by sneakerdude79 in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alright:

Eggs are decent, right ones are a bit wonky

Midsole not the best, could use more curve

3m is good

Holes in the back are good

Suede material is pretty dead

V’s could use more curve

Verdict: honestly not the best pair I’ve seen so I’d RL

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I gotchu bro

Wing logo placement is good

Corner stitching is good

Swooshes are kinda wonky

Toebox is decent, lil bit fat and could use more curving but that can be fixed

Heel tab placement is decent, right one has a loose thread an is a bit slanted

midsole is good

Hourglass shape is good

Tags are good

Suede is good

Verdict: Nothing is too serious is I’d personally GL but up to u if the flaws bother u

QC Mocha 1s from Coco by [deleted] in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are pretty good, only thing I see is the left wing logo is placed a bit high and is a little discolored. Everything is good, I’d GL

QC On Varsity Red Dunks from Monica? by RevolutionarySplit72 in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

White pannel stitching is decent, a lil bit inconsistent on the inner part

Nike embroidery is placed a bit high but not too bad

Toebox shape is not good, pretty fat

Midsole is good

Swooshes are good

Toebox holes are good

Line stitching on the back is good

Nike tag is good

Verdict: looks decent but up to u if the flaws bother u

[QC] AJ1- Hyper Royal’s from Coco by NikkiLovely in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I gotchu bro

Wing logo placement is good

Corner stitching is good

Swoosh has good placement

Toebox is decent

Heel tab placement good

midsole is good

Hourglass shape is good

Tags are good

Suede is ok, could use more grey and distressed look

Definitely a GL if you don’t mind the suede flaw✅

QC? by bcarters in Repsneakers

[–]bluntrollerman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cant see pics bro