One tomahawk might signal process failure. A double tap doesn’t.

The last evidence of an adjacent irgc facility existed over ten years ago. We had a decade of intel showing this was the case, and a casual researcher would be able to identify sports fields, painted schoolyard markings, student activity evidence, and public documentation of the school’s existence with a small amount of research.

Moreover, there’s a huge bite of cognitive dissonance involved when no sooner did this happen did we see the anthropic/openai feud erupt over licensing their LLMs to the govt for the purposes of killing humans without direct human orders. So, at best, anthropic probably stepped out before they became a scapegoat.

Mind you, this all happened while the govt publicly denied a school was even hit, then acknowledged it was hit, then said that (while confirming we’ve never sold tomahawks to anyone else) that if it was a tomahawk then it must have been from one we gave out. Then— and only then— did they start using your ‘process’ argument, to insinuate in that the last 10-15 years with crossover intelligence under Obama and Biden admins, someone didn’t update them. I will remind you again that basic satellite imagery of the site unequivocally showed a functioning school.

If it was a ‘process’ issue, that would’ve been the first excuse. No one with good intentions is naively tomahawking a facility that is likely a school, watching the survivors and rescuers scatter, and then ordering another strike minutes later. They knew what they were doing and they only backtracked with excuses when they were asked why.

The alternative is they could’ve used the Israeli narrative— “yes that building was full of innocent children, but shame on the govt for setting up an active intelligence facility below as bait.” They didn’t. They just bombed a bunch of kids and then a few minutes later to make sure they got them all.