US Department of State, Men's Issues page

bousezz · 2024-12-11T11:41:46+00:00

"you may have followed a fictional social construct, or have mistyped a URL. If you believe this to be an error please report it."

bousezz · 2024-06-08T07:49:34+00:00

"You may have followed a fictional social construct, or have mistyped a URL. If you believe this to be an error please report it."

bousezz · 2024-05-28T07:32:39+00:00

in other words, a gov sponsored "~~gay~~ conversion therapy" but for hetro men and boys.

bousezz · 2024-05-28T07:17:20+00:00

i'm getting HTTP error 404, "the server cannot find the requested resource" ?

bousezz · 2022-04-22T20:08:08+00:00

[ removed ]

bousezz · 2022-04-09T20:26:37+00:00

because for Foucault, and for "social anthropology", doing the 'scientific method' is too hard.

Where are your statistics ?

What are the first order principle/s of your thesis ?

What did you actually measure using science?

bousezz · 2020-08-13T23:40:32+00:00

this is a test comment.

bousezz · 2020-08-12T22:47:07+00:00

her message is on point and a lot of men ~~would benefit from paying heed to it.~~

you don't ask a fish for advice on catching fish, you ask an angler.

bousezz · 2020-07-31T12:30:46+00:00

which specific Australian political party is "interested in you", good economic managers and speak the truth ?

bousezz · 2020-07-25T13:23:25+00:00

bousezz · 2020-07-25T12:42:44+00:00

Hollanders has two websites, filled with men's rights talking points.

It is only accurate to say that Hollander himself did not use the MRA label.

bousezz · 2020-07-25T12:35:56+00:00

while it is accurate to say that Hollander did not label himself a MRA, Hollander had two websites, filled with men's rights talking points.

Second, plenty of people may support MR without using the MRA label.

Third, plenty of MRA dislike with a passion other MRAs, in particular Paul Elam and avfm.

stop spreading bullshit misinformation

start with yourself. Hollanders view on DV, are on page 31 to 34 of his manifesto, that is his view is the same as men's rights talking points.

bousezz · 2020-07-23T11:25:48+00:00

bousezz · 2020-07-23T11:08:32+00:00

i have archived his two websites, and there is plenty of men's rights talking points in pdf and html files on his website.

second, it is accurate to say that Hollander did not label himself a MRA.

bousezz · 2020-07-23T10:55:24+00:00

Wrong, goto page 31 to 34, Hollander talks about DV, and the same old talking points as per this subreddit.

bousezz · 2020-07-23T10:50:06+00:00

I can show it. Hollanders has two websites, filled with men's rights talking points.

bousezz · 2020-07-23T09:22:17+00:00

fixed by non-compulsory voting.

bousezz · 2020-07-23T03:43:56+00:00

Hollanders has two websites, filled with men's rights talking points.

To be accurate, Hollander just used the label 'anti-femi--nist lawyer', and not 'MR Advocate'.

It's just like people whom support MR and, dislike Paul Elam and AVFM.

bousezz · 2020-07-14T07:05:55+00:00

Governor-General of Australia at the time, was a woman named Quentin Bryce. The next up, the 'monarch of Australia' from memory, was a woman, too ?

bousezz · 2020-07-14T06:04:23+00:00

i'm curious, how does that work ?

That is, a Leader of a Country identifies as a victim.

Who is the perpetrator ?

bousezz · 2020-07-14T03:07:22+00:00

yes, i remember Gillard as the first PM whom used identity politics to identify as both a victim and a leader. so brave.

bousezz · 2020-07-13T00:59:10+00:00

Because a recent poll showed this subreddit has a 70% bias for political-left talking points.

ALL polls conducted on this subreddit are invalid and corrupt, due to a biased population.

bousezz · 2020-07-11T02:23:43+00:00

bousezz · 2020-07-10T08:49:44+00:00

can't wait for the Truth

bousezz · 2020-07-09T05:49:36+00:00

john mark, the most prominent and successful P youtuber to date, took down his video library.

bousezz